- Dec 7, 2006
- 2,618
- 6,098
All clubs have them ,us included ,fair play to Villa ,can't wait to we get back on an even keel,then we will see!!Horrible fans in realty. Shithouses
All clubs have them ,us included ,fair play to Villa ,can't wait to we get back on an even keel,then we will see!!Horrible fans in realty. Shithouses
I heard earlier he got manager of the month, how on earth did that happen??Genuinely how much longer until he is gone? Surprised he hasn't gone already.
Let’s hope that ozil tweet comes back to bite his old club in the ass!
And Cameron. Or is it West Ham he supports? Or Burnley? He's not sure but he's maintaining his working class love of all things claret and blue.How dare you say that about the Prince of Wales and Tom Hanks!
It will be interesting to see if their league form suffers from a Conference League run, as with Emery in charge, I would expect them to go far in that comp.Martinez is such a prick goalie but the sort of player you'd worship if he was in your team.
How good are Villa? Can they hold onto top 4? It's theirs to lose really.
Jamie Redknapp as well moaning about the handball goal ruled out. BafflingHave been watching the game on Swedish TV and listened through a 20 min studio talk, where the only refereeing decision discussed was that the Havertz goal was rightly disallowed.
Then they bring in a feed interview from Sky with Odegaard, where one of the first questions asked is, "Do you feel there was a sense of injustice with some of the decisions in the second half?
I know they feed on controversy, but trying to create it from thin air is just pathetic.
It was a double whammy.... Maguire won player of the month!I heard earlier he got manager of the month, how on earth did that happen??
Jamie Redknapp as well moaning about the handball goal ruled out. Baffling
Is he saying "clear and obvious" as of to say the handball wasn't clear and obvious?Arteta crying again.
Was it not called by the ref on field anyway?Is he saying "clear and obvious" as of to say the handball wasn't clear and obvious?
The rule is about the decision which was "no goal".
That's what he's saying. The ref called it no goal and VAR confirmed that the decision was not a clear and obvious error. It was, in fact, spot on and therefore what on earth is Legoman bringing up 'clear and obvious' forWas it not called by the ref on field anyway?
Ah, sorry - got confused as Havertz pretty much juggled the ball like a chestnut fresh out the oven, so wasn't quite sure how anyone in their right mind could think it was anything other than a handball.That's what he's saying. The ref called it no goal and VAR confirmed that the decision was not a clear and obvious error. It was, in fact, spot on and therefore what on earth is Legoman bringing up 'clear and obvious' for
Because he is making sure the refs don't give 50 50s against them.That's what he's saying. The ref called it no goal and VAR confirmed that the decision was not a clear and obvious error. It was, in fact, spot on and therefore what on earth is Legoman bringing up 'clear and obvious' for