- Oct 19, 2004
- 39,837
- 50,713
I have to say, mate, that little screen grab looks a lot like your much vaunted 4-3-3 with Eriksen and Alli playing the 8/box to box respectively either side of a more dedicated, single DM. I'm surprised you're criticising it because of that.
When we didn't have the ball and we weren't pressing Sissoko and Son definitely dropped back to make it a more conventional 4-1-4-1 but when we did have the ball or we were pressing it looked like Erisken was playing that 8-style role in a 4-3-3 while Alli had more freedom to bomb forward and sort of go where he wanted as well as press when we lost it with Son and Sissoko pushing further up to become inside forward/winger respectively.
I acknowledged that it was difficult for me to truly discern what formation we were playing. I watched the game just about twice, checked heat maps, checked "INFLUENCE" maps and touch maps etc in order to try and get an accurate handle on it.
I think you could call it 433 - hence me saying something along the lines of "why not bring Winks on and make it more of an "orthodox" 433, suggesting that I did think it was a kind of 433.
I accept that with the fluidity of games, the nature of players and play to "follow the ball" at times it is very difficult at times (for me anyway) to identify formations, even during a whole 90 minutes. Except where Poch is concerned we've been so wedded to 4231 it's rarely been an issue.
But going by all the actual data available, and watching it twice, I would definitely describe it most accurately as a 41221/4141 more than a traditional 433, but I guess the dutch would call it a 433 pointing backwards or something?
All that aside, lets take a minute to applaud that Pochettino did try something different, and as I said, for 50 minutes it worked extremely well, probably the best 50 minutes of football we've played this season, possibly ? We not only dominated the ball but there was some tempo and fluidity, and people like Wanyama, Eriksen, Son, Janssen fulfilled their remits well and gave us good balance of skills, Alli and Sissoko slightly less so.
But the weakest part of Pochetino's make up is how he copes with the last phase of games, particularly when his teams are winning by 1 or 2 goal margins. It was something I continually pointed out before we hired him, and it continues to be a worry. At both clubs he's had seasons where his teams have turned over more winning points in the league. That is not a coincidence IMO. People will point to the fact that we also recovered more points than any other team last season, and that is great, but an easier task, tactically, that teaching a possession based team that prefers being on the front foot how to protect a lead, that is how teams win titles etc.
It wasn't that Boro ended up creating lots of chances (but if Rhodes puts that header anywhere other than straight at Lloris it's 2-2) but that was more because of their general lack of talented creative players, but they did have lots of dangerous possession, and there were several times when people like Traore broke through our midfield and they were bearing down with good numerical situations only to completely waste the situation.
I think the situation seemed so easy to read, they were piling through our midfield in central areas, not wide areas, it just seemed the most logical thing to put Winks on and try to get a busy body in there try and get back control of the midfield, the Sissoko/Lamela swap just did not address the situation that was unfolding IMO, it just through more chaos into the mix.
So for me, there were some new positives and some of the same old negatives from yesterday.I'm not suggesting we/Pochettino is unique in this, just we/he is who I am observing most and inevitably talking about.
Last edited: