ThorntonSpur
every away game is a home game
- Jan 21, 2011
- 2,440
- 645
seems like danny boy has been called up for england along with chambers, colback and delph.
good move or not?
good move or not?
Rose called up for England
- Thread starter ThorntonSpur
- Start date
ILS
Well-Known Member
- Jun 21, 2008
- 3,803
- 6,913
It just shows the lack of depth of quality in the English game. Fabian Delph is another Reo Coker. I think Chambers in the long run will be the only one out of those four who will have a decent England Career.
tottenmal
Well-Known Member
- Aug 22, 2013
- 801
- 2,082
I think it will do him good. As he'll have a coach when he gets back that'll bring him back down to earth if he gets to cocky (replace him with Davies basically).
I do like seeing 4 spurs players in the u21 squad though. Promising signs for the future.
I do like seeing 4 spurs players in the u21 squad though. Promising signs for the future.
WalkerboyUK
Well-Known Member
- Jun 8, 2009
- 21,658
- 23,476
Friendly against Norway, then Euro qualifier against Switzerland.
DiamondLites
Well-Known Member
- Jul 29, 2011
- 4,658
- 13,200
Levy be like...
Krafty
Well-Known Member
- May 26, 2004
- 4,797
- 2,139
Glad for Danny, although whether he plays is another thing.
With Cole retired and Shaw injured/unfit, Rose could be next in line after Baines. Without meaning to be harsh on the lad, if he gets games in the qualifiers then its a troubling sign of a lack of depth in English football.
With Cole retired and Shaw injured/unfit, Rose could be next in line after Baines. Without meaning to be harsh on the lad, if he gets games in the qualifiers then its a troubling sign of a lack of depth in English football.
Blake Griffin
Well-Known Member
- Oct 3, 2011
- 14,167
- 38,484
and people on here said it would be phenominal if we could get £6m for him. 
Gbspurs
Gatekeeper for debates, King of the plonkers
- Jan 27, 2011
- 27,014
- 61,941
and people on here said it would be phenominal if we could get £6m for him.
I'm not a hater of Danny Rose but an England call up doesn't really mean much in terms of his ability or value.
Spurrific
Well-Known Member
- Jun 2, 2011
- 13,501
- 57,356
Kieran Gibbs should be above Shaw anyway. If he wasn't perpetually injured, he would deserve to be second choice.
Sp3akerboxxx
Adoption: Nabil Bentaleb
- Apr 4, 2006
- 5,428
- 8,179
and people on here said it would be phenominal if we could get £6m for him.
So, he is like, super amazing now he's in the England team?
Spurrific
Well-Known Member
- Jun 2, 2011
- 13,501
- 57,356
No, but he's not shit like most on here have been saying.
Sp3akerboxxx
Adoption: Nabil Bentaleb
- Apr 4, 2006
- 5,428
- 8,179
Because he got an England call up? Or because Roy Hodgson says so?
Do you not see a glaring hole in the logic of "he plays for England therefore he is not shit"?
Let us not forget that Roy Hodgson thought that Paul Konchesky would be the solution to Liverpool's left back problems.
degoose
Well-Known Member
- Jul 3, 2004
- 2,833
- 3,014
good on Rose getting into the squad, he wasn't great last season but really there were not many who were. The season before at Sunderland though he was their best player. So far this season he has looked a lot calmer on the ball and has been pulling off some good passing and control which he never showed before, i can only assume Poch and the rest of the coaches have been changing his habits .
Spurrific
Well-Known Member
- Jun 2, 2011
- 13,501
- 57,356
Because he got an England call up? Or because Roy Hodgson says so?
Do you not see a glaring hole in the logic of "he plays for England therefore he is not shit"?
Let us not forget that Roy Hodgson thought that Paul Konchesky would be the solution to Liverpool's left back problems.
No. He's not not shit because he's got an England call up. He's not shit because he's not a shit player. He's been one of our best players thus far. Some will remain to be set in their nonsensical ways it would seem.
