What's new

Ross Barkley

paulcumpstone

Well-Known Member
Jul 17, 2008
8,781
10,892
Everton have apparently just upped their offer for siggy to 45m so maybe could improve our chances of speeding up the barkley deal.surely they cant keep them all.
 

doctor stefan Freud

the tired tread of sad biology
Sep 2, 2013
15,170
72,170
Jim White currently dribbling into his wank bucket over the improved Siggurdson offer. Boy does the irritating little scrote mite want this to happen
 

E17yid

Well-Known Member
Jan 21, 2013
17,121
30,966
45 million is madness.

It is but it isn't. It's over the top but you'd expect that seeing as they're selling to another prem team and he still had a few years on his contract.

In this market, Gylfi's set piece delivery alone is worth £30m. He'll probably get 3 or so free kick goals and at least 7 assists from corners/free kicks and that's a conservative guess imo. To Swansea the contribution he makes to those 10 goals could be the difference between staying up or not.

It is a lot of money but it just keeps getting more mental every year so in a sense it's normal. I must admit, though, If I was a Swansea fan I'd be looking at £40m as a minimum, tbh.
 

Shadydan

Well-Known Member
Jul 7, 2012
38,247
104,143
It is but it isn't. It's over the top but you'd expect that seeing as they're selling to another prem team and he still had a few years on his contract.

In this market, Gylfi's set piece delivery alone is worth £30m. He'll probably get 3 or so free kick goals and at least 7 assists from corners/free kicks and that's a conservative guess imo. To Swansea the contribution he makes to those 10 goals could be the difference between staying up or not.

It is a lot of money but it just keeps getting more mental every year so in a sense it's normal. I must admit, though, If I was a Swansea fan I'd be looking at £40m as a minimum, tbh.

If Swansea get relegated as a result of losing Gylfi then that's £150m worth of revenue gone each year until they get promoted again, you can see why they value him so high.
 

Metalhead

But that's a debate for another thread.....
Nov 24, 2013
25,448
38,509
It is but it isn't. It's over the top but you'd expect that seeing as they're selling to another prem team and he still had a few years on his contract.

In this market, Gylfi's set piece delivery alone is worth £30m. He'll probably get 3 or so free kick goals and at least 7 assists from corners/free kicks and that's a conservative guess imo. To Swansea the contribution he makes to those 10 goals could be the difference between staying up or not.

It is a lot of money but it just keeps getting more mental every year so in a sense it's normal. I must admit, though, If I was a Swansea fan I'd be looking at £40m as a minimum, tbh.
He's a very good player for sure but yes, it's indicative of the way that the market has gone mental. I guess that its similar to the housing bubble in London: house prices are mental in terms of what you get but people are prepared to pay the money.
 

yankspurs

Enic Out
Aug 22, 2013
41,978
71,402
We're complaining here because Swansea want £50m for Siggy who is actually a very good player for his club like we didnt pay £30m for Sissoko who was utter shit for Newcastle(a move quite a few on SC defended). Stop bitching about a club wanting an exorbitant fee for a very good player.
 
Top