What's new

Sunderland (H) - Hindsight makes us all look smarter

Krafty

Well-Known Member
May 26, 2004
4,785
2,125
Six days ago a 1-1 draw against a Sunderland side that was destroyed by their North East rivals seemed like another poor result as we struggled for Premiership points. Now of course, after Sunderland beat Chelsea emphatically three-nil it seems a good solid point, the starting point for a good run in the league and hopefully some big points.

After the highs of the Inter victory, White Hart Lane was subdued, the crowd struggling to get up for this game against lesser opposition. However, Sunderland proved that their defeat to Newcastle, no matter how one sided, was a blip. The team from Wearside was actually unbeaten in the league since August, and has not lost against last season’s top six.

Spurs dominated the first half but lacked a true cutting edge. We had plenty of shots form distance, and Modric and Van der Vaart excelled while Bale was kept in check. However, our lone striker was out numbered in the box, and despite Craig Gordon making some good saves, I did not feel any of them were ‘worldies’, as Paul Merson would say.

Sunderland’s lone striker, Gyan, was even more isolated and our defence had no problems dealing with the red and white threat. But Spurs lacked that real threat and I think Sunderland were quite happy as long we played in front of them.

Crouch came on for Pavlyuchenko, and created yet another goal for Van der Vaart. There may have been a sniff of handball from the Dutchmen, but you felt this was the luck that would break Sunderland hearts. All we needed to do was keep a clean sheet.

Oh those elusive clean sheets. Sunderland had decided to put Welbeck up front with Gyan at half time and they had looked a little more dangerous, but our defence contrived to get in each other’s way and allow Gyan an easy chance to score. I suppose the silver lining is it convinced Steve Bruce to go with two upfront at Stamford Bridge, but we really were our own worst enemies.

In the end, the actual game will dissolve from the memory, just like Howard Webb’s performance. However the boos that accompanied the final whistle, directed at the team or ref depends on your viewpoint, and Harry’s reaction may linger longer in the mind.
 

14/04/91

Well-Known Member
Jan 13, 2006
3,564
5,757
Another point worth making - Chelsea's top 3 centre halves from last season (Terry, Alex, Carvalho) were missing yesterday and they looked awful. We've been missing our top 3 centre halves all season.
I'd like to see how Chelsea would've done with Ferreira at centre half all season.
 

Jenko

Well-Known Member
Mar 18, 2004
5,298
4,188
Our draw was two points dropped no matter which way you look at it. We were the better team - end of.
 

Maske2g

SC Supporter
Feb 1, 2005
4,257
1,726
Our draw was two points dropped no matter which way you look at it. We were the better team - end of.

Exactly.

A week before we beat the European champions. does that make Sunderland better than Inter?

What a load of tosh. We were shit, against a team that were very poor on the night.
 

guate

Well-Known Member
May 12, 2005
3,270
1,486
Yesterday's win by Sunderland was totally, TOTALLY, unexpected and all credit to them because they thoroughly deserved it. Chelsea played terrible and I'm quite sure Carlo Ancelotti will make sure something like this doesn't happen again for a very long time.
What it did do though was to show that even Chelsea at home can be beaten and hopefully more teams will now try and go there looking for a win instead of a bore draw.
 

philbanger

Active Member
Aug 2, 2004
213
73
I'm not a fan of this kind of logic, you may as well say West Ham could beat Inter and keep a clean sheet at the same time. Truth was we were better than Sunderland and should have taken all 3 points and would have bar some sloppy defending and a penalty decision not going our way. Sunderland were much better than Chelsea on Sunday and rightly won. 1-1 is still a poor result based on our performance on the day regardless of what Sunderland go onto achieve this season.
 

StokeSpur

Banned
Aug 10, 2005
3,053
1
The only difference is Steve Bruce knows tactics and he got them spot on against us and Chelsea.

His team worked harder than any team i can remember, that combined with his tactics and Chelsea's weakened defence won them the game.

Bruce said afterwards that no one plays two up top against them so we thought we'd try it and see how they coped. He exploited their weakness and it worked. managers with average teams and good tactics can do well.

we dropped two points, we are better than Sunderland all over the pitch but Bruce is tactically better than Harry.
 
Top