What's new

The new premier league TV deal

Rethink

Well-Known Member
Jan 17, 2008
181
342
Apologies if a thread already exists on this, I am happy for it to be assimilated if necessary :)

Just wanted to get an idea on what the breakdown as far as Spurs is concerned, I saw an article stating that the bottom club in 16/17 will receive £99m, and that is without ...

a) international broadcast deal (which I believe is 50% again on top?)
b) BBC MOTD
c) bonus for number of games shown (where i believe we always in the top 5)

does anyone know what these figures actually add up to or look like when broken down?

I'd also be interested to know ...

- how big is our kit / sponsor deal in comparison to those in the prem
- what our salary outgoings are compared to rivals in the prem
- what other large streams of revenue / outgoings do we have

If anyone knows this stuff iim sure a lot of us would be really interested
 

MetalFace D

Well-Known Member
Dec 8, 2014
547
1,229
I hope so. Although, I think we should still see at least some of the funds generated by this invested into the playing squad. It's outrageous money.
Oh definitely, but a lot of clubs will know that PL teams just received a shit ton of money so won't that only inflate the market further?
 

Led's Zeppelin

Can't Re Member
May 28, 2013
7,367
20,244
Your being wildly optimistic you wont see that go on players.

It will mostly go on players wages.

Regardless of how much the club might like to use it for other purposes, they will not be able to resist the need pay the players the going rate, because if they don't someone else will. That's just how this circus works.
 

DaSpurs

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2013
11,816
13,655
Content with every penny of it going to the stadium to accelerate the process, as IMO given players available we could improve tremendously for an embarrassingly low outlay.
 

shelfboy68

Well-Known Member
Jun 14, 2008
14,566
19,651
It will mostly go on players wages.

Regardless of how much the club might like to use it for other purposes, they will not be able to resist the need pay the players the going rate, because if they don't someone else will. That's just how this circus works.

We dont get involved with going rates normally its not levys thing but i do agree with you.
 

shelfboy68

Well-Known Member
Jun 14, 2008
14,566
19,651
Don't worry, I don't expect any of it to go on players :)

Im expecting levy will ferret most of it away for the new stadium of which i can understand however it would be nice to see some quality come in to add to what we have.
 

Yid-ol

Just-outside Edinburgh
Jan 16, 2006
31,252
19,540
Im expecting levy will ferret most of it away for the new stadium of which i can understand however it would be nice to see some quality come in to add to what we have.

We tried that, the youths are showing them up! ;)

All for getting new players in, but would like to keep seeing the youths that are good enough step up also.
 

shelfboy68

Well-Known Member
Jun 14, 2008
14,566
19,651
We tried that, the youths are showing them up! ;)

All for getting new players in, but would like to keep seeing the youths that are good enough step up also.

So would i but not everything will be in the academy so we buy when we need to.
 

SteveH

BSoDL candidate for SW London
Jul 21, 2003
8,642
9,313
Im expecting levy will ferret most of it away for the new stadium of which i can understand however it would be nice to see some quality come in to add to what we have.

Danny boy will still have to do lot of plate spinning to keep moving the club forward. Plate one stadium, plate two, everything else.
 

yankspurs

Enic Out
Aug 22, 2013
42,004
71,497
Apologies if a thread already exists on this, I am happy for it to be assimilated if necessary :)

Just wanted to get an idea on what the breakdown as far as Spurs is concerned, I saw an article stating that the bottom club in 16/17 will receive £99m, and that is without ...

a) international broadcast deal (which I believe is 50% again on top?)
b) BBC MOTD
c) bonus for number of games shown (where i believe we always in the top 5)

does anyone know what these figures actually add up to or look like when broken down?

I'd also be interested to know ...

- how big is our kit / sponsor deal in comparison to those in the prem
- what our salary outgoings are compared to rivals in the prem
- what other large streams of revenue / outgoings do we have

If anyone knows this stuff iim sure a lot of us would be really interested
ESPNFC has our kit/sponsor deal giving us $43.4m per season at the moment. 9th most valuable kit deal in Europe(chart on last page). Although it is 9th in Europe, it is 6th in the PL. Here's the PL club kit/sponsor deals. They have AIA as a 1yr/$26.7m deal, but I am assuming the money is right, or close to it, while the length is off. The UA kit deal is up soon and I am sure Levy will probably be asking for alot more money now in a kit deal since Liverpool and United have agreed to record kit deals recently.

The Deloitte money league has us as the 13th richest club in football bringing in £180.5m in revenue in 2014 with commercial sponsorship as a whole giving us £41.8m and £43.9m match day and £94.8m broadcasting. Matchday and broadcasting seem a bit too high to me, so im not sure if these numbers are right. Here's the full report: http://www2.deloitte.com/content/da...group/deloitte-football-money-league-2015.PDF

Unfortunately, the club hasnt released a financial report since December of 2013 so who knows whether any of those numbers are right.

I do know the current PL broadcasting deal with NBC in the US brought the TV revenure up from like £30m+ to £60m+. The next one(I pray with NBC as their PL coverage has been unbelievable) will probably take the tv revenue from £100m to probably like £140-150m.

Other revenue streams besides matchday, commercial sponsorships and tv are the international tours, stadium tours, memorabilia/apparel sales, transfers(and you know Daniel is all about the transfer profits).
 

camaj

Posting too much
Aug 10, 2004
8,195
883
Apologies if a thread already exists on this, I am happy for it to be assimilated if necessary :)

Just wanted to get an idea on what the breakdown as far as Spurs is concerned, I saw an article stating that the bottom club in 16/17 will receive £99m, and that is without ...

a) international broadcast deal (which I believe is 50% again on top?)
b) BBC MOTD
c) bonus for number of games shown (where i believe we always in the top 5)

does anyone know what these figures actually add up to or look like when broken down?

I'd also be interested to know ...

- how big is our kit / sponsor deal in comparison to those in the prem
- what our salary outgoings are compared to rivals in the prem
- what other large streams of revenue / outgoings do we have

If anyone knows this stuff iim sure a lot of us would be really interested

a) International deals are negotiated seperately. I'm not sure how much
b) The BBC just won the highlights package bid, apparently they paid £204m, or 4% of the live rights.
c) There's no bonus for the number of games shown. Each club get a fee for each game and they get a prize money depending on where they finish in the table. I'm not sure what the broadcast fee will be but we stand to get over £100m in prize money.

According to the deliott football money league we got in the region of €113m last season from broadcasting and the next deal is worth 71.2% more than the current one. However not all of that broadcasting money is domestic rights. There are foreign rights to and we can't assume they'll increase in value by the same amount, so we'll probably get less than a 70% increase of last years broadcast fee but if we perform well on the pitch we may get more.
 

Spursidol

Well-Known Member
Sep 15, 2007
12,636
15,834
It will mostly go on players wages.

Regardless of how much the club might like to use it for other purposes, they will not be able to resist the need pay the players the going rate, because if they don't someone else will. That's just how this circus works.

The Pl have agreed a cap on player wages - £60m pa with a £4m pa maximum increase from TV money and since that's the biggest money spinner and fastest increasing revenue stream (for all clubs) it is a real cap.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...inancial-cap-clubs-face-points-deduction.html
 

225

Living in hope, existing in disappointment
Dec 15, 2014
4,563
9,064
is it enough to buy messi and ronaldo to solve our wing problem ?

No one could afford either, IMO. Although you were joking, I'd guess that both of them would be on 500k per week - that's £26m a year each. So a team with both would be £52m in wages leaving £8m for 23+ other players. lol.

That's without transfer fees too!
 
Top