- May 31, 2011
- 8,840
- 20,317
- Thread starter
- #141
A goal for Kane and Rose in the league and a goal for Bobby and an assist for Paul in the Europa League.
You look at that and it's weird the amount of shit Chadli gets...could do better, seems to have more potential than he's showing but that's an impressive total. Under 1 in 2 games for assist/goals@carpediem991 Hope this is ok
Thought it would be useful to update for minutes (up to Newcastle)
..............................Mins...Mins/goal or assist
34 - Harry Kane - 3238, 95
16 - Nacer Chadli - 2464, 154
15 - Christian Eriksen - 3395, 226
13 - Erik Lamela - 2394, 184
11 - Andros Townsend - 2011, 183
9 - Roberto Soldado - 1747, 194
7 - Danny Rose - 2530, 361
6 - Paulinho - 1360, 227
5 - Ryan Mason - 2189, 438
4 - Nabil Bentaleb - 2465, 616
3 - Emmanuel Adebayor - 980, 327
3 - Ben Davies - 2165, 722
2 - Eric Dier - 2390, 1195
2 - Mousa Dembele - 1812, 956
2 - Vlad Chiriches - 1440, 720
2 - Etienne Capoue - 1213, 607
2 - Aaron Lennon - 738, 369
1 - Benji Stambouli - 1447, 1447
1 - Fazio - 1886, 1886
Harry still averaging just under a goal or assist every game !
You look at that and it's weird the amount of shit Chadli gets...could do better, seems to have more potential than he's showing but that's an impressive total. Under 1 in 2 games for assist/goals
We play better with Lamela, awful first half yesterday, but second half he was superb Imho.Chadli gets shit because be raised the bar dramatically first half of the season, played wonderfully v Chelsea, then tailed off really badly. However, if he can find consistency then he's a superb player.
These stats really show what our front 4 should be. Lamela, as disappointing as he has been, is our fourth highest producer despite barely playing the last few months. Imagine if he hadn't been dropped for Townsend.
Although I agree I'd prefer Lamela you do realise the stats say Lamela is only a minute per goal/assist better ...Chadli gets shit because be raised the bar dramatically first half of the season, played wonderfully v Chelsea, then tailed off really badly. However, if he can find consistency then he's a superb player.
These stats really show what our front 4 should be. Lamela, as disappointing as he has been, is our fourth highest producer despite barely playing the last few months. Imagine if he hadn't been dropped for Townsend.
If we did the Soldado equation and penalties don't count I wonder how them stats would look.Although I agree I'd prefer Lamela you do realise the stats say Lamela is only a minute per goal/assist better ...
Paulinho comes out pretty well in this, compared to Mason, Bentaleb and Dembele.
You look at that and it's weird the amount of shit Chadli gets...could do better, seems to have more potential than he's showing but that's an impressive total. Under 1 in 2 games for assist/goals
If we did the Soldado equation and penalties don't count I wonder how them stats would look.
Agreed 100% .If Poch hadn't played Soldado and Adebayor until November, but played Kane from the start of the season, we'd have a lot more points based upon his almost goal or assist pergame - certainly into top 4......
Already have. Would only be 2 points behind CityAgreed 100% .
The annoying thing being he found formula and abandoned it at a crucial time.
Just hope we don't look back at Burnley, Villa results and think what if?
Yes but first half of the season Paulhino was playing as a no 10, whereas Mason, Bentaleb and Dempsey were playing as CM's - 2nd half of the season Paulhino and Dempsey switched position.
I'ds like our cm's to score and/or make more assists next season (Mason and Bentaleb's 2nd PL season) but its noteworthy that few other teams have many goals or assists from cm (Lampard the exception)