What's new

Tottenham weighing up whether to challenge Son Heung-min's red card

mawspurs

Staff
Jun 29, 2003
35,111
17,813
Tottenham are considering appealing Son Heung-min's red card against Bournemouth. The official saw Son's reaction which sent Lerma tumbling to the ground after the Colombian was pushed in the arm. But Pawson appeared to miss Lerma striking Son on the back and then treading on his foot before the Spurs star's out of character response.

Source: Daily Mail
 

spud

Well-Known Member
Sep 2, 2003
5,850
8,794
I'm curious about whether any retrospective action can be taken against Lerma. Not only for the Son incident, when he stamped and also hit Son in the back, but also for doing the same stamp when Alli bent down to pick up the ball and for putting his head into Alli's face.

I realise that shithousery is (unfortunately) part of the game, but there were at least three occasions when he could - and perhaps should - have received a yellow card.
 

slartibartfast

Grunge baby forever
Oct 21, 2012
18,320
33,955
Plus what was the red actually for?
Unsporting behaviour?
Wasnt the face.
Wasnt a punch.
Wasnt an elbow.
Wasnt dangerous play.
 

TottenhamMattSpur

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
10,925
16,007
The current laws state a red card offence is:

  • Serious foul play
  • Violent conduct
  • Denying an obvious goal-scoring opportunity (handball)
  • Denying an obvious goal-scoring opportunity (foul)
  • Spitting or biting
  • Using offensive, insulting or abusive language and/or gestures
  • Receiving a second caution in the same match
Think it's a no brainer he had to go.
You'd all he spitting bloody murder if we were playing Lolerpool or Chelsea and one of their players wasnt sent off for that.

Also consider our other fouls that should have seen Dier sent off and the fact Foyth got sent off as well. We can't plead innocence, our discipline was unacceptable.
 

slartibartfast

Grunge baby forever
Oct 21, 2012
18,320
33,955
I wouldnt call that SERIOUS FOUL PLAY or VIOLENT CONDUCT.
Id call that handbags at dawn.
Christ if we see red cards everytime someone is shoved we'll never finish with 22 players.
And what Dier and Foyth did has absolutely fuck all to do with it.
 

Japhet

Well-Known Member
Aug 30, 2010
19,294
57,691
The FA will always back the Ref's decision unless it's absolutely 110% obviously wrong. Waste of time challenging it IMO even though Lerma is a total hand pump.
 

Dinghy

Well-Known Member
Jun 22, 2005
6,326
15,561
How long do we have to lodge an appeal?

How quickly can they hear the appeal after it is lodged?

Could we challenge the red card so that Son can play Sunday and then accept the extension at the start of next season for a frivolous appeal?
 

TottenhamMattSpur

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
10,925
16,007
It's not getting overturned because we're not appealing it.

Daily Fail says so, so it's likely made up. You can end up with an extended ban for frivolous appeals, so it's just not worth it.
 

punky

Gone
Sep 23, 2008
7,485
5,403
How often are people sent off for a shove? It seems to happen most matches and right under the refs noses. They are very inconsistent in the way they enforce it.
 

JC-Rule

Well-Known Member
Dec 14, 2005
1,993
1,285
Well we've all but made the top 4 now.

Let's just leave it and learn our lesson.

Wasnt it a touch of I'll discipline that cost us the title challenge a few years back?
 

ginola007

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
884
1,144
Well we've all but made the top 4 now.

Let's just leave it and learn our lesson.

Disagree. Three match ban means Sonny will miss the first two games of next season. If the appeal goes our way, he will perhaps miss only the Everton game.
 

Dillspur

Well-Known Member
May 18, 2004
3,755
9,948
The reaction of lerma is what got him sent off, down like a ton of bricks holding his face and rolling around, it's embarrassing.
 

spud

Well-Known Member
Sep 2, 2003
5,850
8,794
......Also consider our other fouls that should have seen Dier sent off and the fact Foyth got sent off as well. We can't plead innocence, our discipline was unacceptable.
Much was made of the fact that Dier didn't touch the ball in the challenge that 'should' have seen him get a second yellow card. Nobody seemed to notice that he didn't touch his opponent either. He made a sliding challenge that didn't connect with anything. So instead of receiving a second yellow card, the Bournemouth player who collapsed should have received a yellow for simulation.

I'll say when our players are at fault, and Foyth's challenge was stupid and deserved a red. But let's not assume that just because a TV pundit (or several) says something that it's correct.
 

rupsmith

Well-Known Member
Jul 29, 2006
1,714
2,328
The reaction of lerma is what got him sent off, down like a ton of bricks holding his face and rolling around, it's embarrassing.

Exactly - that’s what led the ref to believe that he had been struck in the face which would constitute violent conduct.
 

shelfmonkey

Weird is different, different is interesting.
Mar 21, 2007
6,690
8,040
Shoving an oppo player is not a straight red card offence! We should appeal and it should be rescinded!
 

TottenhamMattSpur

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
10,925
16,007
Much was made of the fact that Dier didn't touch the ball in the challenge that 'should' have seen him get a second yellow card. Nobody seemed to notice that he didn't touch his opponent either. He made a sliding challenge that didn't connect with anything. So instead of receiving a second yellow card, the Bournemouth player who collapsed should have received a yellow for simulation.

I'll say when our players are at fault, and Foyth's challenge was stupid and deserved a red. But let's not assume that just because a TV pundit (or several) says something that it's correct.

He was still lucky the ref wasn't conned, and even knowing he got lucky, he makes another clumsy tackle in the box which definitely was a 2nd yellow and a penalty.

Someone suggested a 3 match ban but it's possibly not going to be 3 games. Not all reds are?
 

Japhet

Well-Known Member
Aug 30, 2010
19,294
57,691
Much was made of the fact that Dier didn't touch the ball in the challenge that 'should' have seen him get a second yellow card. Nobody seemed to notice that he didn't touch his opponent either. He made a sliding challenge that didn't connect with anything. So instead of receiving a second yellow card, the Bournemouth player who collapsed should have received a yellow for simulation.

I'll say when our players are at fault, and Foyth's challenge was stupid and deserved a red. But let's not assume that just because a TV pundit (or several) says something that it's correct.


I'd like to see all instances of simulation get a yelloe card. Sick to death of people saying 'but if didn't go over the Ref wouldn't have given anything'. IMO, if the contact isn't strong enough to have the player over, acting like it was is cheating. Players collapsing in a heap when they get touched on the shoulder is pathetic. it's a contact sport and there's a difference between contact and a foul - you can absolutely have one without the other. It's not basketball.
 
Top