- Nov 6, 2006
- 1,203
- 12
I feel the big difference in this game was that we did not implode going down to 10 men after a very bad call of judgement by both the linesman an referee. Still also have doubts about the penalty.
He blocked a goal bound shot.Maybe
But
Never
A
Red
Card
He blocked a goal bound shot.
I think we need to look at it as a neutral.
Goal bound is the debatable point How could either Ref of Asst be sure ?He blocked a goal bound shot.
I think we need to look at it as a neutral.
He blocked a goal bound shot.
I think we need to look at it as a neutral.
Still also have doubts about the penalty.
I've just sat here, with a palace fan, who thought both decisions were harsh, and he watched it on YouTube a few times and then said:It needs to be looked at in the right context. Yes he handled, but he could have hardly done much about it at point blank range. His arms were up, but was there true intent? I didn't think so. However he might have stopped a goal scoring opportunity... Therefore a logical conclusion should be that the penalty being given was probably correct, but the red card was very harsh.
By the way, we won! Let's not forget that...
He blocked a goal bound shot.
I think we need to look at it as a neutral.
I'm not a negative rating type of guy, so I rated you funny.Hi mate
it wasn't a deliberate handball, and it wasn't a definite goal as there was another defender and Hugo in the mix so therefore I don't think a pen.
Anyway, we got the result so I suppose that is all that matters... along with the fact that Foy is a **** and always fucks us...