What's new

We are punching above our weight.

nicdic

Official SC Padre
Admin
May 8, 2005
41,857
25,920
Our squad is not punching above its weight, but the club as a whole is.

Considering the amount of money the teams around us spend, we have done excellently to even come close to challenging them, and to do so on a regular basis.

But the squad that we've assembled, although maybe not quite as strong as those above and around us, is certainly not far off and should be competing.

Think you've nailed it here TSH. In one sense we are massively over acheiving, but in another, we're right where we should be. As a club, compared to what we're up against we shouldn't get near. United, City, Chelsea, Arsenal, and probably Liverpool and maybe even Newcastle take in more money each week than us. The first five in that list will also more than likely pull in bigger sponsorship and global marketing money. City and Chelsea have what seems like unlimited resources, whilst we run one of the tightest ships financially in world football. That's not to say the league is decided solely on money, but it goes a long way to assembling a team.

On the other hand we have a much smaller wage budget, bring in less money, and likely spend less on incoming players than any of them. This is why some give Levy such credit, we really shouldn't be competing for a place in the top four, yet, at the same time we should. We've managed to assemble one of the best teams in the league, have a good manager, and some of the best players.

Looking at things from both perspectives we need to remember that we've done extremely well to get where we are. Chelsea and City are there because of foreign money, which without they'd probably not be in the premier league, and yet we've done things the hard way, and with relative success.
 

Liquidator

Supporting Spurs since 1966
May 2, 2007
1,516
823
Well Cazorla was a pretty damn good buy. The sort of player we're clearly missing in our own team.

Agree he's really great on his day, but he isn't consistently so. And you're right, we're missing Modric - who I'd compare him to.
 

Murder She

Member
Jul 3, 2009
47
10
I cannot subscribe to the argument that the league is weaker. I am not saying it is stronger either. It's just that there is no conclusive evidence to support either argument, IMO.
 

Gbspurs

Gatekeeper for debates, King of the plonkers
Jan 27, 2011
27,014
61,941
I cannot subscribe to the argument that the league is weaker. I am not saying it is stronger either. It's just that there is no conclusive evidence to support either argument, IMO.

Got something for you to sit on here mate!

BFAD08BD-DA02-4835-A673-9B20D67B489D-10142-00000CB2D323299F_zps567b7d90.jpg
 

aliyid

Well-Known Member
Dec 28, 2004
7,026
20,214
I don't agree that we're over achieving or punching above our weight. If you look at league finishes over the past three years then we're currently par for the course with 4th - 5th - 4th finishes (and now floating between 3rd and 5th for this season)

So I would actually say that we're exactly where we should be.
 

Kendall

Well-Known Member
Feb 8, 2007
38,502
11,933
I don't agree that we're over achieving or punching above our weight. If you look at league finishes over the past three years then we're currently par for the course with 4th - 5th - 4th finishes (and now floating between 3rd and 5th for this season)

So I would actually say that we're exactly where we should be.

I would say Chelsea have underperformed and that's why we're anywhere near them, but we SHOULD be well above Arsenal.

So in reality, 4th is right. As a squad, we have the 4th best in the league.
 

talkshowhost86

Mod-Moose
Staff
Oct 2, 2004
48,325
47,569
I would say Chelsea have underperformed and that's why we're anywhere near them, but we SHOULD be well above Arsenal.

So in reality, 4th is right. As a squad, we have the 4th best in the league.

Do you think our squad is better than Arsenal's? I think it's quite tight and certainly don't think we should be well above them in terms of squad quality.
 

michaelden

Knight of the Fat Fanny
Aug 13, 2004
26,458
21,824
That Arsenal sold RVP and will still finish above us is embarrasing.

To be fair, our transfer spending isn't in line with a club that really wants to push on. It's the minimum amount to keep us where we finish every season (4th-5th)

And we sold Modric and VdV and King retired! I don't see your point
 

Wirral Spurs

Well-Known Member
Jun 9, 2009
958
1,386
That Arsenal sold RVP and will still finish above us is embarrasing.

To be fair, our transfer spending isn't in line with a club that really wants to push on. It's the minimum amount to keep us where we finish every season (4th-5th)

They spend £1m per week more than us on wages, that's more than a team of Gareth Bales!!! It is embarrasing for them maybe especially as they have spent most of the season below us.
 

Spurger King

can't smile without glue
Jul 22, 2008
43,881
95,149
I cannot subscribe to the argument that the league is weaker. I am not saying it is stronger either. It's just that there is no conclusive evidence to support either argument, IMO.

I think it's more diluted compared to how it was a few years ago. Back in the days of the classic sky four (United, gooners, chavs, and bin dippers) those teams were generally very strong and monopolised the best players. These days there are more good teams, meaning the best players are spread about more, resulting in slightly weaker 'top teams'.

If that makes any sense :confused:
 

Mullers

Unknown member
Jan 4, 2006
25,914
16,413
5th is our weight class, so if that is where we finish that is not punching above our weight.
 

talkshowhost86

Mod-Moose
Staff
Oct 2, 2004
48,325
47,569
I think it's more diluted compared to how it was a few years ago. Back in the days of the classic sky four (United, gooners, chavs, and bin dippers) those teams were generally very strong and monopolised the best players. These days there are more good teams, meaning the best players are spread about more, resulting in slightly weaker 'top teams'.

If that makes any sense :confused:

Basically the league isn't weaker. If anything it's stronger because there are more teams that can beat anyone else on their day.

I think it's just arrogance from the traditional top teams to say 'the league is weaker because we don't have as many points'.
 

14/04/91

Well-Known Member
Jan 13, 2006
3,583
5,789
Arsenal & Chelsea are weaker than previous years but we're talking clubs that have won &/or challenged for the title.
We've been on an upward curve and are in our rightful position, fighting for3rd/4th.

You cannot call either of those teams 'weak' with some of the players they've got. We've done very, very well to be competing.
 

dontcallme

SC Supporter
Mar 18, 2005
34,406
83,889
Arsenal & Chelsea are weaker than previous years but we're talking clubs that have won &/or challenged for the title.
We've been on an upward curve and are in our rightful position, fighting for3rd/4th.

You cannot call either of those teams 'weak' with some of the players they've got. We've done very, very well to be competing.
We have done well to be competing but these teams aren't doing as well in the CL as they did previously.

On paper Chelsea are very strong but it is telling that they finished 6th last season and currently battling for top four. The appalling way they are run is having a negative affect on their team.

Arsenal have been losing their top stars to Barca and the 2 Manchester clubs. I don't believe a lot of the players they have been buying are up to the quality they had 6 seasons ago.

Financially we are punching above our weight but the billionaire clubs aren't as dominant as you'd expect because of the way they are run.
 

Mullers

Unknown member
Jan 4, 2006
25,914
16,413
They spend £1m per week more than us on wages, that's more than a team of Gareth Bales!!! It is embarrasing for them maybe especially as they have spent most of the season below us.
It doesn't matter where they spend most of the season it matters where they finish at the end of the season. If they finish in the top four as I expect them to do, there is no embarrassment.
 

Wirral Spurs

Well-Known Member
Jun 9, 2009
958
1,386
It doesn't matter where they spend most of the season it matters where they finish at the end of the season. If they finish in the top four as I expect them to do, there is no embarrassment.
that was my point, I think!!
 

al_pacino

woo
Feb 2, 2005
4,576
4,112
On paper Chelsea are very strong but it is telling that they finished 6th last season and currently battling for top four. The appalling way they are run is having a negative affect on their team.

Imagine the trophies they win if they had just Jose then Ancellotti managing them during the Abramovich years. They'd have won the CL earlier and probably a couple more times and at least a couple more leagues titles too. The mad way that its run has given other teams a look in.
 
Top