- Sep 20, 2005
- 9,999
- 5,494
Can someone just reassure me please...the goons can't actually win the league can they?
Can someone just reassure me please...the goons can't actually win the league can they?
At the start of the season my wife said "not trying to wind you up but I think it may be their (scum's) season".
I pray she's wrong. I REALLY don't need her saying "I told you so" about them being champions!
Then you can't read. I said that recouping the money doesn't matter not that losing bale didn't matter. It's been said on several occasions when we've been accused of spending a lot of money that we haven't because our net spend is low. It's a dumb argument wheeled out to defend AVB.Only it very much does, because we lost from our squad the quality of players worth that amount of money. I genuinely can't comprehend how you can classify selling Gareth Bale, the very player you say he relied upon, as something that 'doesn't matter'.
[qAdaptingjambreck, post: 3704181, member: 25506"]Speaking of Harry...........given the debate raging in Spurs Chat about Spurs' current failure to perform well in attack, it's interesting to note that even though QPR are flying high in theChampionship, they aren't firing properly in attack either. Only 18 goals scored in 16 games.
QPR's success thus far is very much based on their stingy defence. Only the 8 goals conceded.
I tend to agree with the bolded bit, obviously not the accusation that I missed the point though.Then you can't read. I said that recouping the money doesn't matter not that losing bale didn't matter. It's been said on several occasions when we've been accused of spending a lot of money that we haven't because our net spend is low. It's a dumb argument wheeled out to defend AVB.
Besides, nobody, or at least very few, on here believed Bale was worth the money.
You also miss the point that AVB has done little to alter the style of the team despite missing bale and that last year he relied on him to an unhelpful degree.
I tend to agree with the bolded bit, obviously not the accusation that I missed the point though.
I don't agree that your first paragraph statement that it is 'a dumb argument' to use net spend instead of gross; I think it is obvious that if you receive 86m for a single player, you are likely to spend more money than a team who receives no income from sales.
Wait, so the Bluebirds are wearing red and the Red Devils are wearing blue?
So, Paulinho, Chiriches good buys that seems to fit in with AVB's approach and can probably be justified financially.
I didn't see the game but have just read that rooney should have been sent off for a stamp. Did anyone see this, is a ban likely??
Had a kick out in about the 8th minute, should have got a red, but only received a yellow.
The rules changed this season so that retrospective action can still be taken if a yellow card was given, but I very much doubt anything will be done. Another case of the FA bottling it against a high profile player/club.
So, Paulinho, Chiriches good buys that seems to fit in with AVB's approach and can probably be justified financially.
I think we all know the goons will win the league and Spurs will finish 5th on alphabetical order.