What's new

Youth Development - Reserves and the loan system

Spursidol

Well-Known Member
Sep 15, 2007
12,636
15,834
I have been a big supporter of the loan system for younger players, but this season Spurs have found that we have too many players trying to get out on loan (we have 20 plus possible players - other top sides have simiar numbers of players) and maybe the League sides have almost reached saturation. Result has been too many of our loanees have spent time on the bench - not the intention of the loans !

Maybe we need to run the loan system in parallel with the reserve system - providing the reserves become more competitive and better for player development. Has the FA and Premiership woken up to the problem ?
Maybe they just want another match to sell at weekends ?

http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/...-u21s-league-to-replace-reserves-7622226.html
Green light for U21s league to replace reserves

Premier League takes measure to ensure that elite young players are given more game time

The Premier League is to re-launch the current reserve team competitions as a national under-21s league, to provide game time for elite young players who are languishing on the bench, The Independent has learned.

The League's 20 clubs have agreed that games in the new Premier League Reserve League will take place at weekends and may shadow those between the first teams where possible. But they will come after Premier League matches, allowing those players who have made the bench in the elite division, but gained little or no playing time, the opportunity to play in a high-quality second-string game. The new league seems likely to be fully established for the 2013/14 season, rather than this August – because the clubs are yet to agree on how many over-age players each side should be allowed to field, ensuring the league offers a means of older players returning to full fitness.

The new league aims to resolve a critical problem in the English game, of the best young talent getting minimal competitive football in squads packed with expensive acquisitions. "By the time I came through the non-league system I'd not received that much coaching but I had 250 games behind me," said England's caretaker manager and under-21 manager Stuart Pearce. "Too many of my players at under-21 level haven't had enough game time. Of that squad I may only have had eight or nine who played on the Saturday. Now that's a crying shame."
The Independent can reveal that a national under-18 league is also to be established for all Premier League and Football League clubs which attain Category 1 status – the highest grading under the new Elite Player Performance Plan (EPPP) – in another attempt to better develop young players.

It is unclear whether the under-21 league, which clubs with a Category 1 youth development grading under EPPP will join, will carry any commercial opportunities, though there may be some prospect of that if adequate interest is kindled in a competition which could give, for example, Chelsea's Josh McEachran or Liverpool's Raheem Sterling game time they might otherwise miss on a bench the day before.

The current Premier Reserve League is split into a northern and southern division but four clubs – Manchester City, QPR, Stoke and Tottenham – do not field sides, and the competition has certainly faded badly since Kevin Keegan dealt it a significant blow by removing Newcastle United in the mid-1990s. Its inadequacy for player development was highlighted in January when Andre Villas Boas, then Chelsea manager, suggested Premier League clubs should be allowed to field reserve sides in the Football League. The Football League called this "offensive", but Everton manager David Moyes has since disclosed that he was thwarted in his own plan to play an Everton 'B' team in the Football Conference in an attempt to upgrade competitive levels for his young players. Newcastle United manager Alan Pardew has also said he is "looking closely" at the wisdom of continuing with the Reserve League in its current format.

There is also dissatisfaction among clubs with stronger youth set-ups at the standard of under-18s opposition. The success of last season's Under-19s European NextGen tournament, in which Internazionale defeated Liverpool's semi-final opponents Ajax in the final at Leyton Orient, has proved the value of elite opposition. Manchester City's intention to compete again next year is based on their belief that the experience of overseas travel to play and encounter different systems have been invaluable.

The new national under-18s league will provide better competition for top youth sides on a more regular basis. Damien Comolli, director of football at Liverpool – whose 6-0 home defeat to Ajax in the NextGen semi-final revealed a gulf in class – told the LFC Magazine last week that "we want to play against the best". He said: "From day one we have told the Premier League the principle of the best against the best, and playing and training with the best will get our backing. Recently, we played against Manchester United in the under-15s and it was technically a very good game with a high quality of football played."

In France, reserve teams may enter the professional pyramid and play as high as the fourth tier – England's League Two – and although that seems unworkable in England, the former France technical director Gerard Houllier is among those urging changes. "In England you lose a lot of players between 18 and 21," he said. "The two countries who are failing are England and Italy. I knew one or two players [when manager] at Aston Villa who did not have enough games to play at the top level. Between 18 and 20 there is nothing. In France when they don't play on a Saturday, they can play for the reserves the next day."
 

chadders

Active Member
Mar 21, 2009
322
191
I don't see what difference it will make. Essentially just rebadging the reserve league with u21 league. Most players in the reserves are u21 anyway.
 

DanNolan

Well-Known Member
Oct 14, 2006
1,369
2,524
Love that scousers got a kicking after unjustly getting though. I'm afraid proper feeder clubs or b teams in the football league is fast becoming the only real potential answer to the fading national team. I totally agree that the league is becoming saturated and even the championship is won usually (not this year) dependant on the quality of loans mustered.
 

Harry_Snatch

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2009
1,532
1,099
We need to look to Spain and Germany on this. Like the Germans clubs should be forced to field a certain number of genuinely home grown players and like Spain, premier league clubs should be able to enter a B team in the 4th division.
 

Luka Van der Bale

Well-Known Member
Jan 29, 2011
6,041
13,611
Love that scousers got a kicking after unjustly getting though. I'm afraid proper feeder clubs or b teams in the football league is fast becoming the only real potential answer to the fading national team. I totally agree that the league is becoming saturated and even the championship is won usually (not this year) dependant on the quality of loans mustered.
Love that we beat the eventual winners 7-1 :D
 

stov

Well-Known Member
Jul 20, 2005
3,353
6,112
gomlett has signed on permanent basis for us- I opened his UK bank account;)
 

Armstrong_11

Spurs makes me happy, you... not so much :)
Aug 3, 2011
8,608
19,289
there is already an under 18 league...

and the reserve league is important to help injured players to get back to full fitness.

no reason to change that.
 

eddiebailey

Well-Known Member
Oct 12, 2004
7,454
6,717
Even without players currently on loan or injured we could field a respectable reserve team, mostly made up of players U21:

Miles; Smith, Bongani, aussie-lad-whose-name-I-have-forgotten, Byrne; Ceballos, Luongo, Nicholson, Rose; Parrett; Lancaster

Sure it would do them more good to play in a properly organised and promoted U21 league than playing ad hoc behind close door friendlies.
 

spursandbarca

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2008
3,972
446
do what they do in spain. the b team cannot play in the same league as the 1st team. system is much better.
 

InOffMeLeftShin

Night watchman
Admin
Jan 14, 2004
15,105
9,122
do what they do in spain. the b team cannot play in the same league as the 1st team. system is much better.

Then what happens to all the teams in lower divisions who have been established for decades? I don't think there is really a problem with the way things are in England. I'm not sure how this new U21 league will really make much difference as the matches aren't going to be anywhere near the quality or competitiveness of a real league game. It is up to the managers to decide which players are best served staying and training with the squad and which should go out on loan to get first team experience.
 

Dundalk_Spur

The only Spur in the village
Jul 17, 2008
4,960
7,695
Even without players currently on loan or injured we could field a respectable reserve team, mostly made up of players U21:

Miles; Smith, Bongani, aussie-lad-whose-name-I-have-forgotten, Byrne; Ceballos, Luongo, Nicholson, Rose; Parrett; Lancaster

Sure it would do them more good to play in a properly organised and promoted U21 league than playing ad hoc behind close door friendlies.

Imagine the cost of getting that on the back of your shirt!!!!
 

punky

Gone
Sep 23, 2008
7,485
5,403
I've always been an advocate of the Spanish system which uses B teams in the competitive league pyrimid and they always produce the world's best young talent.

The problem is that reserve leagues don't encourage professional development. Loans do but transfer rules stifle this.

It should be that every team should be able to field a B team in the professional pyrimid subjet to the following rules.

1. The B team will always be at least 1 league lower than it's A team
2. B teams are ineligible to play in cup competitions featuring an A team
3. There are unlimited transfers allowed between A and B teams in either direction at any time.
4. There is no age limit, this can also benefit older, injured players to return to action.

I fucking hate the FA. With their greed and studidity they'll eventually destroy English football.
 

Spursidol

Well-Known Member
Sep 15, 2007
12,636
15,834
Update

The FA, Premiership clubs and Football League clubs appear to be involved in a good deal of negotiation concerning the Elite Player Performance Plan (EPPP), which will re-shape youth development more than anything in the last 20 years.

1 Next Season 2012/13

The first signs are that next season (seemingly brought forward a year) Spurs will be competing in :

  • a National under 18 league (not dissimilar to current regional league)
  • a National under 21 league
Plus of course the European under 19 Next Gen Series.

Next season there may be around 30 to 40 Professionals (Reserves) and 30 Academy players on Spurs books, so these leagues will be vital to provide experience to Spurs players, topped up with some players on loans – but it is clear from this season that there is not space in football league squads to accommodate all the loanees Spurs would like to find places for.

The investment in salaries and training costs of the 30 to 40 Professionals (Reserves) and 30 Academy players will run into millions of pounds a year. Consequently expect to see at least one player a year getting into the first team squad – some may not ever become stars but will be squad players for a few years.

An announcement by Spurs is probably overdue as other clubs have provided updates ( http://www.watfordfc.com/page/AcademyNews/0,,10400~2735805,00.html ) although Spurs could claim that too many things are still too unclear to make an announcement yet.

2 Academy Status

Haggling is clearly still going on, in particular about the Category of Academy which each team’s Academy can be in – and that matters greatly as the higher Academy status the more benefits and financial compensation are available – although the category awarded is subject to an independent audit.

Category 1 (the highest) status require a minimum of 18 full-time staff, an operational budget of £2.5 million, and residential facilities.

Spurs new training ground does not have residential facilities – although if necessary no doubt Spurs could apply for planning permission – but otherwise meets the criteria. A number of other Premier clubs are in a worse position, although the likes of Man U and Arsenal meet all the criteria.

Smoke signals suggest that the 20 Premier League clubs have reached a compromise that they are all going to be Category 1 – with non compliant clubs being given time to upgrade – whilst the 7 Football League clubs who applied for Category 1 Status (and some have produced good players such as Watford and Southampton) are still in negotiation.


3 Advantages of a Higher Category of Academy Status

Category 1 academies can sign players beginning at age nine, as can category 2 academies. Category 3 allows teams to begin signing players at the age of 12, while Category 4 must wait until players are 16. The rule restricting Academies from being able to recruit only within 90 minutes travel to a Spurs centre has been scrapped – meaning that Spurs can compete throughout the UK (and world) to recruit young players against other Premiership clubs.

However the biggest change will come from the abolition of the Independent Tribunal to decide the compensation due on the transfer of a young player (Spurs had to pay £700,000 for John Bostock when Crystal Palace insisted it went to Tribunal for example)

Replacing the Tribunal system will be a system of fixed tariffs. The new tariffs will see a selling club paid £3,000-per-year for every year of a player's development between the ages of nine and 11.

The fee per year from 12 to 16 will depend on the selling club's academy status - but ranges between £12,500 and £40,000 ie a Category 1 Academy acquiring a player from a Category 4 Academy would only pay £12,500 for each full year from age 11 (plus any earlier years at £3,000 pa) that young player had been at that Academy. The result of course will be that it will be far cheaper for Category 1 Academies to acquire young players from other academies.

 

beats1

Well-Known Member
Feb 22, 2010
30,024
29,599
The new tariff system is just wrong and may kill the english game, We should be proud we have four very competitive leagues with some very big teams in each of those leagues

Bringing youth is the only way some of these teams survive
 

nightgoat

Well-Known Member
Sep 12, 2005
24,604
21,898
We need to look to Spain and Germany on this. Like the Germans clubs should be forced to field a certain number of genuinely home grown players and like Spain, premier league clubs should be able to enter a B team in the 4th division.

Ok, say from next season every Premier League team was allowed to enter a B team in League Two. Who's going to tell every team that finished lower than 4th the season before they've now been relegated?
 

Spursidol

Well-Known Member
Sep 15, 2007
12,636
15,834
The new tariff system is just wrong and may kill the english game, We should be proud we have four very competitive leagues with some very big teams in each of those leagues

Bringing youth is the only way some of these teams survive

Agreed.

The purpose of these changes is supposed to be to improve the English game (including dealing with England's selection problem of too many overseas players in the Premiership reducing the chances of England players getting playing time).

The idea to introduce fixed tarrifs to cut out big transfer fees seems to be to discourage Premiership clubs buying as many overseas players and instead buyng players from lower academies which are now cheaper and under thios nw training system, better trained.

Can't see it myself ! I think Premiership clubs will still buy abroad and when they buy players from other academies they will just be glad they are cheaper.

A better solution might have included :

  • A minimum of 90% of academy players being genuinely born in UK
  • A minimum of 2 players (out of 7) on the bench being academy players
  • A minimum of 6 players on the field being born in UK
  • A minimum of 50% of a team's squad being born in UK
  • etc
  • Then improve Academies coaching and facilities - but leave the compensation on transfers the same
As ever the FA have not thought through the problem enough to think through the solution (and too many are probably not bright enough to do that) and the Premiership has acted in self interest and screwed the other clubs.
 
Top