- Sep 15, 2007
- 12,636
- 15,834
- Thread starter
- #3,161
They should be able to and that would include Pritchard, Obika, Bentley, Stewart, Smith and potentially Kane. This could be our team for the U21's and if Kaboul makes it back, he would allowed to be the last overage player. Also Archer and Miles can both come in as well
ObikaCebellos-------------------PritchardBentaleb CarrollLivermoreFryers Hall Caulker SmithVigouroux
Don't disagree with the logic or players at all.
But there are several other experienced players not in your line up who are available including Ryan Mason, Dean Parrett and Cameron Lancaster for example - the first two of which played a number of u21 games before January to get the u21's into the healthy league position they are in rioday.
I guess the age old question is whether you want to win the competion (= play expereience) or develop players (= play younger players to give them the experience).
In the last few games (particularly since Luongo, Parrett, Byrne went to Swindon) Spurs u21 goalscoring has reduced as have results declined. Sherwood needs to decide on the appropriate mix of experience (to win matches) v giving experience to younger players.
IMO we need one or two more experienced players than in the last few matches to go on and win the competition - and again IMO its worthwhile to win it to say to other younger players 'hey we are the best in the UK with younger players - why not join the best'.
We need a cionstant flow of the best young players going forward to get one or two a year into the first team every year as a 'must' to meet oiur plans and asprations - we certainly cannot afforsd to buy lots of squad players and so must rely on these youngsters coming into the first team squad each year to replace squad players.