- Sep 28, 2004
- 45,893
- 68,893
@Franchise60---See.If we lost all our games against the top 4 teams and won all the rest................we would be Champions.
@Franchise60---See.If we lost all our games against the top 4 teams and won all the rest................we would be Champions.
See.
If we lost all our games against the top 4 teams and won all the rest................we would be Champions.
If we lost all our games against the top 4 teams and won all the rest................we would be Champions.
If we lost all our games against the top 4 teams and won all the rest................we would be Champions.
I'm enjoying this stage of your delusion more than anything else, tbh.What.....you can't handle the TRUTH?
maths not a strong point bro?
I'm enjoying this stage of your delusion more than anything else, tbh.
so so bitter.I am not delusioned at all ............Sherwood has gone and we move on...........I just don't think Pochettina is the right guy.
Did you run out of fingers and toes?
sure did, but then I took my foot out of yo momma.
Thing is; Spurs could win all games except for top 4. But then let's say City win all their games plus 1/2/3 of their matches against the other 3 in the top 4. That means your suggestion is wrong, right?
top 4 teams usually don't lose every single match against top 4 teams
Could say this about FDB too ya know
You don't think Ajax are playing good football?Big plus with Poch is we get our good football back (should do anyway). And I am all for that.
We don't necessarily get that with FDB unless he changes from what Ajax are doing.
There are 20 teams in the Prem. If we won all our games against the bottom 16 teams, then we would have: 16 teams X 2 games each X 3 points per win = 96 points. That would be 10 points more than City this year.sure did, but then I took my foot out of yo momma.
Thing is; Spurs could win all games except for top 4. But then let's say City win all their games plus 1/2/3 of their matches against the other 3 in the top 4. That means your suggestion is wrong, right?
But no one knows who will be 'the right one'
I can think of positives and negatives of RB, FDB and Poch and am still undecided.
What I do know is that we need to fully back any manager 100% and give time.
The only manager who we could get with some PL & CL experience is Benitez; Even he might not want to leave Napoli at the moment; Apart from him, can't think of another one with similar profile who is available;
Candidate list is quite short IMO. We have no way but to look for young & upcoming manager. So, there is always a element of risk associated with it. We already missed the boat on Rodgers & Martinez, saying they aren't good enough or big enough for Spurs.
Lets not make the same mistake again.
AVB lost the boardroom & looked to have lost the appetite in 2nd year; On other hand, Sherwood lost the senior players in the dressing room. Both made huge mistakes.
Pochettino IMO is a perfect candidate
PROs :
i) PL experience ✓
ii) Player management - both in Espanyol & Southampton, his players adored him ✓
iii) Work under DoF model ✓
iv) Play attacking football ✓
v) Set the team up well defensively ✓
vi) Develop & nuture academy players ✓
vii) Punch above the weight ✓
viii) Talk no nonsense to media ✓✓
CONs:
i) Has not got a eye for a player - buys of Osvaldo & Wanyama didnt work out
ii) Has not won anything
To me, his pros outweigh the cons;
Also, am least bothered about the 2nd because we need to see his achievements in the context. No one expected Southampton to be in Europe; infact not many thought they would survive in PL, when he took over from Nigel Adkins; A top 8 finish is commendable given the number of young players he gave chance & played;
The first one is a concern, but if he could work with Baldini or Bloomfield, I am sure it can be taken care of.