- Oct 2, 2004
- 48,331
- 47,584
- Staff
- #361
You'd like to think so, but I suspect it won't be the case.
Up until last night he was easily a £75-80 million player.
A season long ban (which simply won't happen) would still see him return next year aged 28 and more than capable of winning games single-handedly for teams. Liverpool won't sack him while there is still money to be made.
It's incomparable to Chelsea sacking Mutu as that was for drug offences (and he only scored 6 in 27 for them).
Chelsea also then sued Mutu (successfully) for loss of earnings to the club. Because he then joined Juventus (via Livorno) both clubs also had to pay a portion of money.
Can you really see Liverpool sacking him and then demanding the equivalent of a transfer fee from him if he signs elsewhere at the end of the ban???
To be honest I'm surprised Liverpool haven't already issued a statement defending him and saying that somehow it's all Patrice Evra's fault.
I expect to see Rodgers making excuses for him pretty soon after the tournament finishes. Perhaps they'll get Dalglish out to further defend their darling little beaver.