What's new

Summer 2015 Non-Spurs Transfers

coysjod

Well-Known Member
Feb 18, 2011
1,440
4,231

well guidetti doesn't cost less then, does he?​
Well he is for free, you know like when you don't pay for something. That you then take free food home and give it salary is another issue that you if you like could discuss with your therapist in the next session :whistle:
 

225

Living in hope, existing in disappointment
Dec 15, 2014
4,563
9,064
Well he is for free, you know like when you don't pay for something. That you then take free food home and give it salary is another issue that you if you like could discuss with your therapist in the next session

So he doesn't want a wage or a signing on fee? What about his agent?
 

coysjod

Well-Known Member
Feb 18, 2011
1,440
4,231
No problem. If you're interested, Brighthouse do free TVs and Sofas too.
“Everyone wants a player who scores many goals. It is invaluable for a team.”

Manchester United are amongst those thought to be targeting Kane, with a fee of £40 million mooted in the media.

Asked what he was worth by comparison, Guidetti joked: “I do not know. I am Bosman, so a cheeseburger costs more than me.”

If you get a free car you still have to pay insurance, taxes, gasoline and maintenance but you did get the car right, you know for free? I think that is what Guidetti means when he JOKES about his value.
 

225

Living in hope, existing in disappointment
Dec 15, 2014
4,563
9,064
If you get a free car you still have to pay insurance, taxes, gasoline and maintenance but you did get the car right, you know for free? I think that is what Guidetti means when he JOKES about his value.

He's not free! You would still have to pay HIM and his agent a fee just to get him to sign a contract. You then have to pay for him every week just to keep that contract going. If you stop paying, he leaves. It's like getting a car on a lease, not a free car.

Have you had prior experience of getting cheeseburgers on finance or something?

I'm aware he was joking, and so was I until it became apparent that two of you don't seem to understand that he isn't actually free at all.
 

coysjod

Well-Known Member
Feb 18, 2011
1,440
4,231
He's not free! You would still have to pay HIM and his agent a fee just to get him to sign a contract. You then have to pay for him every week just to keep that contract going. If you stop paying, he leaves. It's like getting a car on a lease, not a free car.

Have you had prior experience of getting cheeseburgers on finance or something?

I'm aware he was joking, and so was I until it became apparent that two of you don't seem to understand that he isn't actually free at all.
The Bosman ruling meant that players could move to a new club at the end of their contract without their old club receiving a fee. Players can now agree a pre-contract with another club for a free transfer if the players' contract with their existing club has six months or less remaining.
let it go. Guidetti jokes about costing less than a cheeseburger and you want to pay cheeseburgers salary? Everybody understands that agents and sign-on fees cost. Exactly like your car even if you get it for free will cost you in taxes, insurance, gas, maintenance and so on. It was merely a joke from Guidetti, let it go.
 
Last edited:

225

Living in hope, existing in disappointment
Dec 15, 2014
4,563
9,064
let it go. Guidetti jokes about costing less than a cheeseburger and you want to pay cheeseburgers salary? Everybody understands that agents and sign-on fees cost. Exactly like your car even if you get it for free will cost you in taxes, insurance, gas, maintenance and so on. It was merely a joke from Guidetti, let it go.

It was a joke from me too - you were wrong - let it go.

Either that or tell a future employer in your next interview that you cost less than a cheeseburger. Don't be surprised if they expect you to work for nothing.
 

Reece

Shutterbug
May 27, 2005
2,860
1,779
Well he is for free. That you then take free food home and give it salary celery is another issue :whistle:

FYP

RVP to Fener is good for them. Who are Utd gonna have up front by the beginning of the season though?
 

Marty

Audere est farce
Mar 10, 2005
40,273
64,238
FYP

RVP to Fener is good for them. Who are Utd gonna have up front by the beginning of the season though?
Rooney obviously. Hernandez is back, although injured ATM. Wilson is the talented prospect. Think they'll be fine unfortunately.
 

beats1

Well-Known Member
Feb 22, 2010
30,039
29,629
Rooney obviously. Hernandez is back, although injured ATM. Wilson is the talented prospect. Think they'll be fine unfortunately.
I wouldn't be surprised if they went for someone like Lacazette but that strike force isn't fine for a title challenge imo

Rooney hasn't scored over 20 goals in a season since 2012, bar that and 2010, he has been a consistent 1 in 2 striker. which isn't bad but when City have Aguerro(last season 26 goals in 33 games) and Chelsea have Costa(last season 20 goals in 26 games)

United need a top striker to compete, yes rooney has played alot of games as AM/CF but I think you're asking alot of him to move back to striker and expect him to perform
 

SpursDave88

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
2,193
5,831
I wouldn't be surprised if they went for someone like Lacazette but that strike force isn't fine for a title challenge imo

Rooney hasn't scored over 20 goals in a season since 2012, bar that and 2010, he has been a consistent 1 in 2 striker. which isn't bad but when City have Aguerro(last season 26 goals in 33 games) and Chelsea have Costa(last season 20 goals in 26 games)

United need a top striker to compete, yes rooney has played alot of games as AM/CF but I think you're asking alot of him to move back to striker and expect him to perform

United began last season with Rooney, Van Persie and Falcao and now we are saying they need a striker?!?!
 

Luka Van der Bale

Well-Known Member
Jan 29, 2011
6,041
13,611
I wouldn't be surprised if they went for someone like Lacazette but that strike force isn't fine for a title challenge imo

Rooney hasn't scored over 20 goals in a season since 2012, bar that and 2010, he has been a consistent 1 in 2 striker. which isn't bad but when City have Aguerro(last season 26 goals in 33 games) and Chelsea have Costa(last season 20 goals in 26 games)

United need a top striker to compete, yes rooney has played alot of games as AM/CF but I think you're asking alot of him to move back to striker and expect him to perform
Rooney is better than Costa.
 

beats1

Well-Known Member
Feb 22, 2010
30,039
29,629
United began last season with Rooney, Van Persie and Falcao and now we are saying they need a striker?!?!
That was for a top 4 challenge not a title challenge

Also they don't have Falcao or Van Persie, normally you replace a striker after 2 leave.
Rooney is better than Costa.
Maybe a better all round player but Costa is a better goalscorer in recent times
 
Top