- Dec 31, 2014
- 2,015
- 5,128
Seems pretty unlikely when city have Jesus and Aguero already. They don't need another striker
I don't for a minute believe Kane will leave but they're supposedly looking for a replacement for Aguero so that's not necessarily true that they don't need another striker.Seems pretty unlikely when city have Jesus and Aguero already. They don't need another striker
Seems pretty unlikely when city have Jesus and Aguero already. They don't need another striker
£200 mil is too good to pass up imo. Question is who do we replace him with? Joao Felix would be a good pick...
Felix doesn't even play in the same position as Kane. Come on.£200 mil is too good to pass up imo. Question is who do we replace him with? Joao Felix would be a good pick...
Why's this now in the transfer forum?
How much would I need to donate to the site to get this thread permanently banned from the transfer forum?
In answer to all those saying that playing in a "defence minded team is a disgrace " I would like to bet that barring injuries he will have his best season regards goalscoring . Jose's sides at Porto / Chelsea / Madrid and inter scored plenty of goals and I would not mind betting pretty close to their league record for a season . This "defensive team " means very few goals is just bull shit . Defensive set up means letting in fewer goals . And the way we play on the break I am looking for plenty of goals next season .
As my mother used to say “paper never refused ink”. I know nowadays she would have to say Twitter never refused a keyboard” but you get my drift.
You can write any old bollix these days and people will read/believe it.
I agree but think if this were to actually happen (and I doubt it will), we’d benefit a lot more by getting 2/3 of their players and a £100m in cash.It wouldn't just take a world record fee for Kane to go, but a considerable amount over the world record fee. We're talking 250m+ for Levy to sanction such madness surely.