What's new

Tottenham Takeover Talk

Would you welcome a 25% ownership stake for Qatar Sports Investments (QSI)?

  • Yes

    Votes: 655 65.2%
  • No

    Votes: 350 34.8%

  • Total voters
    1,005
  • Poll closed .

Nick-TopSpursMan

Well-Known Member
Aug 4, 2005
4,216
20,525
Arsenal would say and they'd always be right we had to buy it, they won it. We'd also never have the chance to really win anything again.

Maybe that means something to some people, means nothing to me, Chelsea have truly won nothing Man City won nothing really (modern day). Plenty of their fans know it as well.

It's like a doris who has a boob job, really she's got a couple of silicon cushions shoved up her top or a bloke who has a knob extension, he thinks he's got a massive cock but the reality is he's got a saveloy in his trousers.

Nothing to be proud of, in your heart you know it's a sausage.

Totally get where you're coming from as I've had a similar mindset in the past.

You know what though? There are so many sugar daddy's coming in now it's not the same as when Chelsea or City did it.

Even if QSI came in for example we will have to compete against City and Newcastle, plus Pool and Utd's new owners (likely to be the same type) and then Chelsea (If Boehly continues to spend like a mad man).

So actually all that would be happening is we are keeping up with the pace, rather than easily claiming a title with oil money as it used to be. The times have changed.
 

Mark_147

Well-Known Member
Aug 24, 2011
1,809
3,021
What we need as a club is a complete reset but it just isn't going to happen.

New owners in, Paul Barber in as CEO, Michael Edwards in as Sporting Director and then a new manager (I have my preference but the whole structure is more important).
Chelsea took Brightons manager and head of recruitment. How's that working out for them. I'll stick with Paratici thanks.
 

Archibald&Crooks

Aegina Expat
Admin
Feb 1, 2005
55,673
205,723
It's like a doris who has a boob job, really she's got a couple of silicon cushions shoved up her top or a bloke who has a knob extension, he thinks he's got a massive cock but the reality is he's got a saveloy in his trousers.
Reeks of personal experience here ;)
 

Trix

Well-Known Member
Jul 29, 2004
19,667
332,024
Arsenal would say and they'd always be right we had to buy it, they won it. We'd also never have the chance to really win anything again.

Maybe that means something to some people, means nothing to me, Chelsea have truly won nothing Man City won nothing really (modern day). Plenty of their fans know it as well.

It's like a doris who has a boob job, really she's got a couple of silicon cushions shoved up her top or a bloke who has a knob extension, he thinks he's got a massive cock but the reality is he's got a saveloy in his trousers.

Nothing to be proud of, in your heart you know it's a sausage.
You know Kroenke is the richest man in sport according to Forbes right?
 

Dunc2610

Well-Known Member
Aug 7, 2008
1,612
4,034
Just out of curiosity, was 'Levy get out of our club' sung at the match against Arsenal? Sky do a good job of muting certain chants at times.
 

Cavehillspur

Well-Known Member
Jan 28, 2011
14,099
18,455
Just out of curiosity, was 'Levy get out of our club' sung at the match against Arsenal? Sky do a good job of muting certain chants at times.
I didn't hear it sung on Sunday but a few disgruntled voices after. One boy said he wasnt leaving the stadium and wanted to make a stand against levy but got fucked out lol. Heard some other fans saying they want Poch back...
 
D

Deleted member 26368

Would any serious investor be happy with not having Conte as manager?

If he’s allowed to walk I really think that this isn’t close whatsoever. Nobody could be that short sighted if they were to come in afresh.

Probably wouldn't matter IMO. Investors tend to have their own agenda and will act with the long-term in mind.

Hughes and Bruce were in charge at City and Newcastle respectively and were disposed of within a year (if that's anything to go by).

I think QSI replaced whoever was in charge at PSG with Ancelotti a month or so after buying them.
 

SpursJord

Well-Known Member
Jan 27, 2018
183
563
Arsenal would say and they'd always be right we had to buy it, they won it. We'd also never have the chance to really win anything again.

Maybe that means something to some people, means nothing to me, Chelsea have truly won nothing Man City won nothing really (modern day). Plenty of their fans know it as well.

It's like a doris who has a boob job, really she's got a couple of silicon cushions shoved up her top or a bloke who has a knob extension, he thinks he's got a massive cock but the reality is he's got a saveloy in his trousers.

Nothing to be proud of, in your heart you know it's a sausage.
Then what do we call it if they win the League this season because they didn't just wake up and win it on a budget!? I mean they have been the biggest spenders over the last 3 transfer windows! Spending 278 million in this time.

Does it not constitute as 'buying' it because the money isn't 'oil' money?

The aim is always the same buy better players and win something, which applies to every club in the world. Regardless of where the money comes from!
 

Danfunkel

Well-Known Member
Jan 31, 2013
1,814
5,847
I didn't hear it sung on Sunday but a few disgruntled voices after. One boy said he wasnt leaving the stadium and wanted to make a stand against levy but got fucked out lol. Heard some other fans saying they want Poch back...
And that’s why Levy will never really feel the fully wrath of the fans. They just blame whoever’s in the dugout.
 

Yiddo100

Well-Known Member
Jan 16, 2019
9,936
52,172
Probably wouldn't matter IMO. Investors tend to have their own agenda and will act with the long-term in mind.

Hughes and Bruce were in charge at City and Newcastle respectively and were disposed of within a year (if that's anything to go by).

I think QSI replaced whoever was in charge at PSG with Ancelotti a month or so after buying them.
They outright bought the club though
 

Bluto Blutarsky

Well-Known Member
Mar 4, 2021
15,294
71,177
Yeah, I would take Conte leaving as a sign that QSI are not investing. Otherwise I would expect Spurs to back Conte and push for Silverware this season rather than embarking on yet another long-term project
 

jurgen

Busy ****
Jul 5, 2008
6,769
17,400
And that’s why Levy will never really feel the fully wrath of the fans. They just blame whoever’s in the dugout.

I don’t want Poch back, one reason behind this being I’m an absolute pochette and I know this will end with his relationship to the club in tatters. The sentimentality means he would be the ultimate human shield for Levy.

I do think he’s deluded and arrogant enough to appoint Tuchel instead though.
 
D

Deleted member 26368

They outright bought the club though
True, so they had more control.

That said, I don't think any particular individual would be a deal breaker as far as investment is concerned, especially not at the prices being talked about.

I expect that what appeals about Spurs to QSI is the infrastructure and potential revenues. Those are harder to put in place than a manager.
 

Karol

Well-Known Member
Jan 4, 2014
721
2,882
Then what do we call it if they win the League this season because they didn't just wake up and win it on a budget!? I mean they have been the biggest spenders over the last 3 transfer windows! Spending 278 million in this time.

Does it not constitute as 'buying' it because the money isn't 'oil' money?

The aim is always the same buy better players and win something, which applies to every club in the world. Regardless of where the money comes from!

Unless you are Daniel Levy
 

Trotter

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2009
2,169
3,312
Just out of curiosity, was 'Levy get out of our club' sung at the match against Arsenal? Sky do a good job of muting certain chants at times.
No, well certainly not in the South Stand anyway.
Crowd were up for it Sunday initially, the way we were playing and the way we conceded soon put pay to that though.
Was expecting maybe some half time booing, but was real strange ending to the half, I thought and I am sure many others did, thought we had been awarded a penalty, and were cheering that, next thing players were walking off for half time, couldn’t work out what was going on.
Afterwards when leaving didn’t hear any ENIC out, but did hear a few Getting Sacked in the morning chants.
Thursday will probably be a mixture of both of them if it goes south
 

Archibald&Crooks

Aegina Expat
Admin
Feb 1, 2005
55,673
205,723
I don’t want Poch back, one reason behind this being I’m an absolute pochette and I know this will end with his relationship to the club in tatters. The sentimentality means he would be the ultimate human shield for Levy.

I do think he’s deluded and arrogant enough to appoint Tuchel instead though.
I think Pochettino is nailed on TBH. Given our next few games, It wouldn't surprise me if it's as soon as next month, if not sooner.

And despite what people say, Pochettino will be (quite rightly) given a really warm reception and it will quieten the protests. In the summer we'll make a couple of signings, people will settle themselves into a "lets wait and see" mentality and it'll buy Levy 12-18 months before the bouncing rubber penny drops once again and we're where we are now again.

It is also possible that in the summer, Levy goes to circus school and learns how to walk on stilts, comes back, puts on a syrup and we announce a new chairman who's 6ft 4" tall and looks like a cross between Catweazle and Jon Bon Jovi. And the disciples of the bouncing penny will fall for it.

TLDR; We need to wise up by not letting up on him. This should not go away again. Not again. If it does then stop fucking complaining, give Levy a great big aubergine and bend over.
 

bat-chain

Well-Known Member
Jan 4, 2009
2,232
9,478
You know Kroenke is the richest man in sport according to Forbes right?

That may be so; but the difference in spending between us and them over the time they have owned Arsenal could easily have been matched by Levy and Spurs based on our income alone. It's about 20m per season over 5 years.

We could have been in their position without needing to financially dope ourselves. That’s what I really don’t get about ENIC at this point. The whole idea of the stadium was to allow us to compete without sugar daddy investors and now we have it we're doing it anyway, what’s that about.

I'm just thinking aloud there.
 

thebenjamin

Well-Known Member
Jul 1, 2008
12,377
39,388
PLEASE
That may be so; but the difference in spending between us and them over the time they have owned Arsenal could easily have been matched by Levy and Spurs based on our income alone. It's about 20m per season over 5 years.

We could have been in their position without needing to financially dope ourselves. That’s what I really don’t get about ENIC at this point. The whole idea of the stadium was to allow us to compete without sugar daddy investors and now we have it we're doing it anyway, what’s that about.

I'm just thinking aloud there.

That's what they sold it as, whereas it was really about doing a massive property / infrastructure deal which netted them billions.
 

Jamturk

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2008
9,931
23,055
Yeah, I would take Conte leaving as a sign that QSI are not investing. Otherwise I would expect Spurs to back Conte and push for Silverware this season rather than embarking on yet another long-term project

Yeah I think you're right, these reports back it up.

Tottenham owner Joe Lewis would like to sell his entire stake in the club as he ‘seeks an exit strategy’ after 23 years in control. The ultimatum would reportedly make it unlikely that Qatar Sports Investment (QSI) will pick up any share in the north London side as they would be restricted to a minority stake under UEFA laws given their ownership of PSG.
 
Top