luRRka
Well-Known Member
- Jul 27, 2008
- 3,713
- 15,802
Next Manager Watch
- Thread starter spursfan1991
- Start date
- Status
DJS
A hoonter must hoont
- Dec 9, 2006
- 31,279
- 21,788
My ‘this’ comment was agreeing with A & C about getting rid of twitter - notice how I marked that section of his post in bold to highlight it
Trix
Well-Known Member
- Jul 29, 2004
- 19,694
- 332,146
Then you link the article the twitter post is taken from. If you think the news is important enough to share one extra click doesn't seem to be too much extra effort.
yido_number1
He'll always be magic
- Jun 8, 2004
- 8,752
- 17,012
Rodgers is the king of being on the wrong end of 4-3 results. His team's.have always been weak defensively. I'd rather steer clear and focus on a more rounded manager.
Depends what you mean by ‘solve’. To become an excellent defensive team we probably need 3 first team upgrades. To become an average one we probably need 1 good CB and a competent manager. And the thing is, an average defence would have us top 4 right now.
Either way, I don’t Rodgers is the right choice. He has never been a good manager defensively - even his signature Liverpool 2013/14 side conceded 50 goals - and by the end at Leicester they were a shambles at the back
homer hotspur
Well-Known Member
- Dec 7, 2014
- 2,944
- 4,729
I read a long article with many quotes from him a few weeks back and it would be a complete change of his stance at that time for him to be interested.
luRRka
Well-Known Member
- Jul 27, 2008
- 3,713
- 15,802
It's the fact its printed front page on the newspaper that the original poster was sharing. ie not a throwaway comment. Unless you want them to post you a copy
- Feb 1, 2005
- 55,686
- 205,802
- Admin
- #17,990
Then, if they are credible, post the origin or source of the story not the aggregators
Edit: it’s probably worth repeating, do not post aggregators. See above
luRRka
Well-Known Member
- Jul 27, 2008
- 3,713
- 15,802
Sorry, the point I'm making is it is a photograph of printed press. Showing the front page of the printed press making it clear its not a throwaway, its obviously a big story for them.Then, if they are credible, post the origin or source of the story not the aggregators
Unless the poster travelled to Portugal and took a photo themselves I don't know what else you wanted them to do. The article referred to was already posted earlier.
For the record I'm in full agreement RE aggregators who twist information. A lot of shit gets posted and I don't think it's fair to jump on someone posting "actual" (may not be true) news stories
wrd
Well-Known Member
- Aug 22, 2014
- 13,603
- 58,005
Well I question how much power we give a narrative, what does it say about us and the club that we can't handle some speculation or conjecture from the press? I mean whose to say that if things start to go well that Nagelsmann or Slot won't be linked with other clubs also, what happens when they're linked? Does the stability then disappear?
Trix
Well-Known Member
- Jul 29, 2004
- 19,694
- 332,146
I get that. Point is it's unnecessary and the original source could be posted just as easily. That way we wouldn't get all the bullshit that comes along with Twitter.
fishhhandaricecake
Well-Known Member
- Nov 15, 2018
- 19,557
- 48,847
- Feb 1, 2005
- 55,686
- 205,802
- Admin
- #17,996
You find the source and post that, the newspaper must have a website. Or download the photo and use that. But in the vast majority of cases there will be a link which can be used
We’ve literally always asked it be done like this
jpascavitz
Well-Known Member
- Aug 8, 2019
- 1,852
- 7,261
Then, if they are credible, post the origin or source of the story not the aggregators
Edit: it’s probably worth repeating, do not post aggregators. See above
Sorry, I can delete if necessary.
It was an odd one because it showed the physical paper copy and I couldn't find that original story living online anywhere. I just did some deeper digging and there is an online article here stashed away on their site: https://www.record.pt/futebol/futeb...ting/detalhe/tottenham-reune-com-ruben-amorim
It's protected by a paywall however unless we have any Portuguese residents here
- Feb 1, 2005
- 55,686
- 205,802
- Admin
- #17,998
Nah it’s done nowSorry, I can delete if necessary.
It was an odd one because it showed the physical paper copy and I couldn't find that original story living online anywhere. I just did some deeper digging and there is an online article here stashed away on their site: https://www.record.pt/futebol/futeb...ting/detalhe/tottenham-reune-com-ruben-amorim
It's protected by a paywall however unless we have any Portuguese residents here
But thanks anyway
Sorry, I can delete if necessary.
It was an odd one because it showed the physical paper copy and I couldn't find that original story living online anywhere. I just did some deeper digging and there is an online article here stashed away on their site: https://www.record.pt/futebol/futeb...ting/detalhe/tottenham-reune-com-ruben-amorim
It's protected by a paywall however unless we have any Portuguese residents here
Honestly 99% of the board took it as you meant it given what you actually posted, cheers for posting it
As much as I like Amorim I still feel he would be too expensive, and yes I know Levy often pays managers good money, I just think with the options available there are others linked who he would look at first, and with more interest.
Rosco1984
Well-Known Member
- Aug 31, 2012
- 1,743
- 7,056
I know formation isn't everything but I just feel like the sooner we bite the bullet and transition to 4 at the back permanently the better even if it means a few rocky months getting players to fit it to start with. We aren't ever going to be serial winners we won't spend that way we just want to be entertained and win the odd thing from time to time. I just cant see any real entertainment coming from being constantly outnumbered in midfield and out pressed. This is why i'm not thrilled with the Amorim links.
- Status
