- Aug 31, 2012
- 5,561
- 11,871
That guy is a WUM
Even if they get Lukaku on loan there's still a fee to pay for that. I guess it just gets taken off what Chelsea still owe them. I just don't see it being enough to cover what they need though.
This. 100%The key line for me is "the club haven't told me anything", so he's obviously waiting for the club to say they've agreed terms with us, and then it's go time.
The rest is usual player waffle
His long ball and crossing into the box is one of his best attributes IMO, he almost looks like a wing back at times in the way he progresses up the pitch.Watch Bastoni tonight-just doesn't put a foot wrong. Love to get him. He can even play a great long ball.
It wouldn't at all because they don't owe Inter for Lukaku anymore, the owe the 3rd party company that Inter sold that debt to.If chelsea were to get Martinez they’d 100% want to knock the money off they owe for lukaku and do a deal that way but it would not benefit inter
I honestly believe him and Gvardiol will be best lcb's in Europe for a long time, and it unfortunate that gvardiol is extremely unlikely for us.His long ball and crossing into the box is one of his best attributes IMO, he almost looks like a wing back at times in the way he progresses up the pitch.
Agree, i'd also say Bastoni is the better fit right now for us as we have Conte and Perisic.I honestly believe him and Gvardiol will be best lcb's in Europe for a long time, and it unfortunate that gvardiol is extremely unlikely for us.
So we need Bastoni.
I don't even know how to respond to this...Have to be careful with signings like this. He'd cost around half our alleged transfer budget so he represents high risk, has no Premier League experience and probably doesn't speak english (correct me if I'm wrong). Defence isn't really something we can afford to get wrong, and I think ours demonstrated that they're already pretty good. It's easy to say Bastoni is an upgrade on Davies right now, but I've seen too many big money flops to be 100% convinced he's a lock-in certainty to deliver for us.
By your theory:Have to be careful with signings like this. He'd cost around half our alleged transfer budget so he represents high risk, has no Premier League experience and probably doesn't speak english (correct me if I'm wrong). Defence isn't really something we can afford to get wrong, and I think ours demonstrated that they're already pretty good. It's easy to say Bastoni is an upgrade on Davies right now, but I've seen too many big money flops to be 100% convinced he's a lock-in certainty to deliver for us.
What news sites have you been reading? We've had £150m put into our transfer kitty, that's been widely reported as on top of player sales (CCV, Lo Celso, Bergwijn, Reguillon & Winks alone to bring in £80m+) and on top of some money from CL qualification.Have to be careful with signings like this. He'd cost around half our alleged transfer budget so he represents high risk, has no Premier League experience and probably doesn't speak english (correct me if I'm wrong). Defence isn't really something we can afford to get wrong, and I think ours demonstrated that they're already pretty good. It's easy to say Bastoni is an upgrade on Davies right now, but I've seen too many big money flops to be 100% convinced he's a lock-in certainty to deliver for us.
Thing is in the current market buying an established PL defender is financial suicide most of the time. Look at how much Man United got bent over signing Maguire and how much Arsenal paid for White - the value in the market is absolutely abysmal. Plus, what attainable top left sided CB even is there that we could target? If wanted someone like Fofana, Leicester would probably ask for 70-80m cos that's what Prem teams do these days.Have to be careful with signings like this. He'd cost around half our alleged transfer budget so he represents high risk, has no Premier League experience and probably doesn't speak english (correct me if I'm wrong). Defence isn't really something we can afford to get wrong, and I think ours demonstrated that they're already pretty good. It's easy to say Bastoni is an upgrade on Davies right now, but I've seen too many big money flops to be 100% convinced he's a lock-in certainty to deliver for us.
I believe it is around £51 million as it is in Euros. Same we roughly spent on Romero as we had the loan to buy option.I didn't say anyone is better than anyone. I just said spending £60million on a player like Bastoni represents high risk, potentially too high relative to other areas that need improving.
Am I against signing him? No, especially not if Conte wants him. That being said, it would be naive to claim he's a certainty to be an upgrade on what we have.
This fucking site dude. In this fucking thread. Literally go back over the last god knows how many pages, all the discussion, news links etc... are all saying €60m - that's a Euro sign at the front in case you're confused. €60m = £51m.I'd like to know what you're reading. Most sites are quoting £60m and that's an absolute minimum.
I mean, you could ramble on about how bad you think my opinion is. At the same time, I can guess how you and 99% of Spurs fans felt about Ndombele at the time we signed him in 2019...
I didn't say anyone is better than anyone. I just said spending £60million on a player like Bastoni represents high risk, potentially too high relative to other areas that need improving.
Am I against signing him? No, especially not if Conte wants him. That being said, it would be naive to claim he's a certainty to be an upgrade on what we have.
Thing is you could say this about literally any signing that hasn't played in our league. It's a calculated risk you always have to take with foreign players. Not to mention, plenty of PL proven signings don't succeed at other clubs either: Torres, Sanchez, Bentley and hundreds of others for a multitude of reasons.I'm certainly not branding it a bad deal/signing. I'm simply suggesting we proceed with caution with signings like this.
I don't know the exact logistics of our transfer budget, but from what I've read, he'd cost £60 million, which would be our record signing, and I assume would be our most expensive signing of this window by a distance. I also do not think it's a foregone conclusion that he will be a success in the Premier League, which is the impression I get from a lot of people from reading this thread.
Once again, I'm more than happy to see him signed. I'm simply offering a different opinion.