- Aug 13, 2005
- 46,692
- 104,980
Enjoy
Soares isn't 30. Pretty sure he's 28.
So he's 28.He's a lot nearer 29 than he is 28. That's a fact.
Enjoy
I still disagree.This gives credence to my relegation comments earlier in this thread. Senior management is the problem here.
It also highlights financial constraints, which makes things worse.
Would I put money on them going down? Probably not as there are too many variables, currently, to offer a clear prediction.
But they're definitely in the 'conversation', so to speak.
So he's 28.
So he's 28.Well he is in his 29th year............
So he's 28.
Seeing stuff like that makes me smile I gotta say. Arsenal are going backwards fast and it's just lovely to watch.
Leeds UnitedIf you can afford to give players £300k a week you're not getting relegated.
True but Leeds were spending well outside their limits in the hope of future earnings.Leeds United
Sure, the spending is certainly very different.True but Leeds were spending well outside their limits in the hope of future earnings.
Arsenal’s spending is within their limits but continue in this Manner and they will stagnate rather than face relegation, imo.
Seems they’re after Clownio Bravo too. Someone’s taking the piss.
This is the thing.Sure, the spending is certainly very different.
Just highlighting the fact you're never too big to go down.
These were some of Leeds' players when they were relegated.
Robinson
Radebe
Kelly
Harte
Barmby
Viduka
Pennant
Alan Smith
Bakke
Seth Johnson
Duberry
Batty
Lennon
Milner
That was still a very good group of players, some of them were on high salaries, I imagine Vikduka was one of the highest earners in the league.
They weren't known for being a soft bunch either. Off-field issues helped their demise.
Not saying Arsenal will go down next year but once the rot sets in, it can worsen quickly, especially when you're not geared for a fight.