What's new

Bowyer cleared by FA

Cicada

Lisan Al Gaib
Jan 17, 2005
1,791
186
well, for a change Bowyer didn't actually do anything..at all...

he was sent off purely on reputation..
 

P-Dogg

Member
Aug 14, 2005
283
15
Yeah I'll give the lad a break this time round, it really was a terrible decision from Clattenturd.
 

ckafetz

Active Member
Feb 10, 2006
1,002
-1
No way was it a red card.

But admittedly we got harshly treated with our red cards which went to appeal
 

Caco

Village Idiot
Nov 2, 2004
1,586
1,928
Neither was Keanes against Brum and that decision cost us the game. Appeal fell on deaf ears. Not suggesting any bias towards spam but it has to same rule to all.
 

talkshowhost86

Mod-Moose
Staff
Oct 2, 2004
48,328
47,577
Neither was Keanes against Brum and that decision cost us the game. Appeal fell on deaf ears. Not suggesting any bias towards spam but it has to same rule to all.

Exactly. Bowyer's was definitely not a red card and it was rightly rescinded. That's the point of the panel. But why wasn't it the same with Keane's which was equally blatantly not a red card?

Plus Keane is a nice cheery Irish fellow and Bowyer is an ugly allegedly racist knobface. So where's the justice?
 

snake1

New Member
Apr 23, 2006
3,583
6
http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11095_3135321,00.html

Seems a bit odd how Wet Spam got there decision overturned considering how our appeals have gone recently.


I thought the sending off was a bit harsh, to be honest.

Off topic, but Barton should of been sent off for what looked like a punch on Shaun Maloney. Apparently, the FA have decided not to punish him after looking at a video of the incident. Lucky boy, in my opinion.
 

snake1

New Member
Apr 23, 2006
3,583
6
Not much, he was a little late with the tackle, but in my opinion, he tried to get himself out of the way.
 

tobi

Clear Eyes, Full Hearts, Can't Lose
Jun 10, 2003
17,597
11,806
Good decision, the tackle before Bowyer's was worse than his non tackle.
 
Top