- Nov 18, 2007
- 31,962
- 57,253
The article says they want caicedo from Brighton and they will probably overpay to get him
They had a £70m bid rejected last week. Mad to turn down that amount IMO but I suppose they know Chelsea will come back.
The article says they want caicedo from Brighton and they will probably overpay to get him
Yeah think he's likely to end up there eventually. Chelsea have proven themselves to be overpaying chumps so Brighton are asking for silly money and are happy to wait.The article says they want caicedo from Brighton and they will probably overpay to get him
I think he'd be the kind of 'all action 8' alongside a more creative player like Lo Celso or Maddison.I personally think CG in the advanced 8 role in AP’s system is a great fit.
They had a £70m bid rejected last week. Mad to turn down that amount IMO but I suppose they know Chelsea will come back.
Yeah and he's proven to be a much better finisher than skipp. Fwiw poch has been playing him at 10 in the 4231 in pre season according to Chelsea fans. He scored the 3rd goal against brightonI think he'd be the kind of 'all action 8' alongside a more creative player like Lo Celso or Maddison.
Basically someone who runs like fuck, does loads of high pressing and harrying off the ball and defensive covering, but can also arrive in the box and finish moves or score from range on occasion.
Basically the role Skipp did in the first half against West Ham.
I’ve seen different to this.Yeah and he's proven to be a much better finisher than skipp. Fwiw poch has been playing him at 10 in the 4231 in pre season according to Chelsea fans. He scored the 3rd goal against brighton
That's a good thing right? The Poch years.feels like we've gone back 10years.
Actually you're correct, what I read was Chelsea fans saying he looked shit in the double pivot and then amazing when he moved forward to the 10 positionI’ve seen different to this.
I’ve actually seen that he’s been playing as the deep-lying midfielder for them in the double pivot.
“Gallagher-Santos double pivot, with Casadei in more advanced positions.
Gallagher played quite well in a deeper position, he played as the deep-lying midfielder.
He drops to help progression, creates from there, and attacks the box.”
Above are quotes from a match analysis after their first preseason game.
The above description does sound quite similar to what Callum McGregor’s role was in the 6 for Celtic.
I do think that he is definitely most likely to play as one of Ange’s 8’s, and whether he would be capable of playing as a lone 6 as opposed to in a pivot remains to be seen.
But I definitely wouldn’t rule out the possibility of it yet.
This chimes with his Palace performances. He's wasted in a deeper role. Needs to be breaking into the box.Actually you're correct, what I read was Chelsea fans saying he looked shit in the double pivot and then amazing when he moved forward to the 10 position
Edit - "I wanted to sell him when he was playing in the double pivot today, then I changed my mind when he moves further forward."
"Nico Jackson is having some cameo
Gallagher is a lot better in this position than he is deeper IMO"
"Yup, being the 10 with two mids behind him is the perfect position for his manic mad dog energy."
"yep looking like he did at palace when the 2 behind him let him push up"
£35m fee apparently