- Jun 13, 2008
- 21,894
- 32,582
Of course that spending wouldn't have guaranteed us winning anything, but it certainly would've given us a better chance. I completely agree with @mpickard2087 that football is unpredictable and it was often fine margins and small tactical/individual mistakes that cost us, but equally, if we'd acted decisively and daringly in the summer of 15/16, as liverpool did in 18/19 and bought a higher tier of player than Vinny fucking Janssen and a last minute Sissoko then we may well have won the league that year.
Think that's looking back on it with the benefit of hindsight as well to be honest. In that summer (2016) we signed Janssen, Wanyama, and Sissoko as our main buys. As a team in 16/17 we got better overall I think most agree, and to be fair we couldn't quite catch a Chelsea team that had a machine like second half of the season even better than ours. But back to those transfers:
Wanyama that year pre-injuries made a huge difference and I'd say we were a better team because of it.
The others on paper make sense and were trying to address and improve things - Janssen was a young striker who could come in as back up to Kane, fitted the mould of a Poch No.9, and who had enjoyed his breakthrough season in Holland and scored a ton of goals for club and was scoring for country too, this is the exact type of player/situation fans every window scream we should be getting and being ahead of the curve. He couldn't adapt to a higher level of football, but I have always thought the reason behind the signing was very sound and on paper he ticked a lot of boxes.
Sissoko many (including I) didn't want, but he added additional power to the midfield area and gave us proper box-to-box running ability we didn't have in the squad and was also PL and International proven. I can see why Poch wanted him. Of course he has his (huge) limitations and he/we couldn't find his role and how to fit him in, but in a perfect world that was adding a solid and versatile squad option and subsequently we have seen you can get some use out of him.
Looking at it objectively, the thought behind them on paper was sound. As we know it didn't work out to varying degrees so yes we can blame the recruitment and whoever identified them but the team didn't suffer for it. Probably many better years than can used as an example.