- Aug 13, 2005
- 46,701
- 104,998
Another Levy error. How can he have appointed him without doing some due diligence on the man? What if he’s been up to equally dodgy stuff with us? That would surely be an actual sacking offence for Levy???
Jesus Christ this is too hard.... None of those clubs have Daniel fucking Levy making the final decisions though do they.No neither does Brighton's Sporting Director or Fulham's or Newcastle's or even Edu. Yet an argument could be made that they are out performing Fabio in the transfer market to obtain the players their clubs require...no?
In all seriousness, I wonder if this is at least partly behind Conte's "you need to speak to others at the club about transfers" spiel..To be fair, "our dealings man might be going to prison" is a pretty reasonable excuse for our lack of business this window.
Poch was brilliant manager for us, but after 5 years it burned out. It's complely normal. Mourinho was bad manager which basically didn't improve single player here. It just didn't work for Nuno, maybe the club was too big or something else.
To be honest I don't understand this argument that we have 9th highest revenue without also mentioning there are 4 other PL clubs with higher revenue than ours.
Ok, it's Levy's fault he didn't spend 300m and our squad isn't the best in the league.
But it's definitely not his fault that this squad made 10 points in last 10 PL games and conceded the most goals itl during this period, or that we we went 2 goals behind in 8 games from our last 14 games(plus another 3 games when we conceded first) in all competitions, or that until this City game last time we were winning after 1st half was 12th October, or that our 1st squad was knocked from Carabao by 2nd Forrest team or that we were nearly knocked out from Champions League. This is massive underperfoming for the coach that should be sacked.
He was to enamoured with his plate spinning that he didn't get that far.Another Levy error. How can he have appointed him without doing some due diligence on the man? What if he’s been up to equally dodgy stuff with us? That would surely be an actual sacking offence for Levy???
If that's the case, hopefully Levy also gets an inhibition and we can get him out (I'm still not sure what the inhibition equates to in legal speak)Another Levy error. How can he have appointed him without doing some due diligence on the man? What if he’s been up to equally dodgy stuff with us? That would surely be an actual sacking offence for Levy???
Imagine that in the actual real world where most of us live. Imagine before hiring anyone into your business you asked if they had ever been convicted of an offence. They said no, and you checked it out…they were telling the truth. But wait…you want to be super sure so you conduct your own investigation into their past dealings that is more in depth and scrutinous than a police investigation just to make absolutely sure. At that point you spot something dodgy so don’t employ them, and then have a convenient way around employment law to explain that to the person.Another Levy error. How can he have appointed him without doing some due diligence on the man? What if he’s been up to equally dodgy stuff with us? That would surely be an actual sacking offence for Levy???
I think the main issue was bringing in an Italian DoF with a preference for pragmatic, defensive football and managers, after Levy spent the summer promising a return to attacking possession football.He is in charge of the football strategy for this club whatever the transfer budget is and whoever is charge with negotiating transfer fees. I just don't see how he is any improvement on what we have had previously before in this role.
I may be going in on him too early and be proven wrong, which wouldn't be the first time. However, I just feel that we need a clear direction and at the moment I feel he is part of the problem rather than the solution.
HilariousIs it really so hard to work out. He's like Keyser Soze to some of you lot.
He was to enamoured with his plate spinning that he didn't get that far.
You can probably do that now since most of them are probably the same ones that wanted rid of Poch and Jose.At least we can call them out and say I told you so. It’s the only win we have!
Well they’re asking for Paratici to be suspended for 20 months.
He’s not suspended yet and that case still has to go to trial.
So common sense says it makes no difference for us right now and he can continue his usual duties for us until told otherwise.
Can anyone who understands legal speak please explain this to me?
Does this mean he can no longer perform his duties for us during this period?
You clearly have a massive hard-on for fucking Levy off which to an extent I fully agree with you.Jesus Christ this is too hard.... None of those clubs have Daniel fucking Levy making the decisions though do they.
Is it really so hard to work out. He's like Keyser Size to some of you lot.
I thought it was a midget Brazilian World Cup Winner?The "plate spinning" was largely completely invented by an SC user with a burner account.
I wonder if he will negotiate his own release clause?Well they’re asking for Paratici to be suspended for 20 months.
He’s not suspended yet and that case still has to go to trial.
So common sense says it makes no difference for us right now and he can continue his usual duties for us until told otherwise.
I think some people, we need to understand, are very very stupid.