What's new

FIFA technical director Marco van Basten suggest (drastic) rule changes

Dharmabum

Well-Known Member
Aug 16, 2003
8,274
12,242
http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/...sten-fifa-plans-change-football-a7534186.html

Fifa technical director Marco van Basten suggests scrapping offside as part of his radical plans for football
The former Milan and Netherlands great is also convinced that today's footballers play too much football and in favour of a seasonal limit on matches


Restricting players to 60 games a year. Replacing penalty shootouts with eight-second run-ups. Introducing orange cards and sending players to sinbins for 10 minutes.

Former Milan and Netherlands forward Marco van Basten is using his role as technical director at Fifa to propose a series of changes to soccer to stir a debate.


Rather than using his job to meddle, Van Basten highlights the need to preserve soccer as the world's most popular sport.

“I have spoken to a lot of coaches and players,” Van Basten said. “We have to promote quality instead of quantity. We are playing too much football now. We have to defend players because they have to play so much and are not fresh or fit anymore.

“That's bad for the quality of the game. Even in June when the big tournaments are played players cannot perform to their maximum because now if players are really successful they can play up to 75 official games in the year. I think that's a bit too much and maybe they should stop at 55 or 60.”

Although Fifa will expand the World Cup from 32 to 48 teams from 2026, that won't burden players with any additional games. Instead, clubs sides would have to explore reducing the number of fixtures, potentially by reducing the number of lucrative friendly games played on tours.

“That's all for money but we have to think about football and not money,” said Van Basten, who was hired by Fifa in September. “For a lot of clubs that's not easy. But there is enough money in football. (Cristiano) Ronaldo and (Lionel) Messi are earning so much money. If they are earning a little bit less but performing better that's good for football.”

Asked about countries like England or France no longer playing two cup competitions alongside their league fixtures, Van Basten said: “In my opinion that should be an interesting discussion.”

Van Basten knows some of radical changes he proposes could make traditionalists uneasy. But the 1992 Fifa World Player of the Year wants to ensure the global game has a say on its future.

“We should not just let the game be organised by those with the money,” he said from Fifa HQ in Zurich. “The big clubs like Paris Saint-Germain, Manchester City and Real Madrid who have everything. In football you need opponents, competition because if you are alone with two or three clubs controlling everything you don't have any competition.”

Rather than burdening players with an additional 30 minutes of action when cup games are level after 90 minutes, Van Basten is suggesting going straight to penalty shoot-outs, which could also be radically altered.

“Maybe the player should start 25 metres from goal and then you can dribble the goalkeeper or shoot early,” he said. “But you have to make a goal within eight seconds. It's more skill and less luck. It's maybe a bit more spectacular. It's more football but it's still nervous for the player.”

Scrapping the offside rule could make soccer more visually appealing, Van Basten advises. “I think it can be very interesting watching a game without offside. Football now is already looking a lot like handball with nine or ten defenders in front of the goal. It's difficult for the opposition to score a goal as it's very difficult to create something in the small pieces of space they give you. So if you play without offside you get more possibilities to score a goal.”

“We are trying to help the game, to let the game develop in a good way,” Van Basten added. “We want to have a game which is honest, which is dynamic, a nice spectacle so we should try to do everything to help that process.”

Van Basten also suggested a middle ground between players being shown a yellow card and receiving a red card and then being removed for the rest of the game. “Maybe an orange card could be shown that sees a player go out of the game for 10 minutes for incidents that are not heavy enough for a red card.”

Such an instance could be when a player commits repeat fouls that didn't warrant yellow cards or obstruct opponents. Five misdemeanors could earn a player a place in a sin bin for 10 minutes.

Any changes to the laws of the game cannot be forced through by Van Basten, however close he is to Fifa's president Gianni Infantino. He said he wants to listen to the views of world before any proposals are taken to the game's law-making body, The International Football Association Board (Ifab). Fifa controls half of the eight votes on Ifab, with the other four retained by the British associations.

AP
 

Lilbaz

Just call me Baz
Apr 1, 2005
41,363
74,893
Fair enough scrap extra time and going straight to penalties. Not a stupid run around the keeper though. You had 90mins to show your skills.
 

Pellshek

Well-Known Member
Dec 30, 2015
2,535
7,337
> Penalty kicks and extra time have nothing to do with the sport of football itself. They're an add-on circus at the end of the real sporting contest, and only occur in one particular format, cup games. As such, this change would be pretty much irrelevant. Don't care.

> Orange cards/sin-bins are on ok idea, but an even better idea is instituting common sense refereeing, with support from the authorities to allow refs to use their heads. We increasingly see this approach in England - the automatic red for denying a goalscoring opportunity changed this season, and as far as I can see, is being reffed really well - so I see no reason to introduce another layer of rules. Now, if you have to watch pitiful, weak, embarrassing Spanish and Italian refs every week, fair enough, but in England the refs are the best in the world, so this idea is also a dud for me.

> 4 quarters rather than 2 halves is a solution in search of a problem. MvB says it'd give coaches more time to coach the players. Eh...and how the hell does that improve the game?? In fact, surely it's more interesting to watch the 11 on the pitch have to work it out, with one chat from the coach at HT, rather than stupid micro-manageing in mid game. Do that in training during the week ffs. This isn't bloody basketball. Terrible idea.

> On removing the offside law, I literally have no idea what a football match would look like without offside, but my instinct says removing offside would be dumbing-down an interesting and complex law that gives the game shape. As such, this is probably a bad idea, but I'd be interested to see an elite trial game out of curiosity.


Over all, I give this shower of shite about 2 out of 10. Still love van Basten though. One of the greatest.
 

kev1nxxx

Well-Known Member
Jan 27, 2013
237
555
Instead of replays and penalties why not free kicks? No walls maybe, a bit more skill involved and I think more appealing to fans
 

Lilbaz

Just call me Baz
Apr 1, 2005
41,363
74,893
The offside rule was brought in for a reason. All you'll get is a goal hanger and weaker teams playing the longball and nothing else.
 

TheChosenOne

A dislike or neg rep = fat fingers
Dec 13, 2005
48,099
50,101
I remember in the dark mists of the past when corners were counted ..

Anglo Italian Cup maybe

Most corners achieved. Fx sake.
 

Challows

Well-Known Member
Jun 14, 2010
413
626
The offside rule was brought in for a reason. All you'll get is a goal hanger and weaker teams playing the longball and nothing else.

Means Pulis can fulfil his dreams over getting 10 CBs on the pitch at one time with 6 at the back and 4 at the other end. Pulisball at its finest.
 

McArchibald

Well-Known Member
Jun 6, 2010
1,294
5,656
Out with pressing, combinations, tiki-taka and so on - in with long ball tactics and catenaccio.... :(

Blithering Idiot...
 

Danners9

Available on a Free Transfer
Mar 30, 2004
14,018
20,804
you could just make offside mean offside. Get rid of the interfering/not interfering grey areas and just say all players must be onside for it to count.
 

dagraham

Well-Known Member
Sep 20, 2005
19,130
46,118
Like the penalty shoot out idea. I watched the Hockey during the Olympics and their version of a penalty shoot out is similar and imo far more interesting than traditional penalties. Also think the sin bin idea could work.

Don't agree with the rest. The offside rule is too ingrained into football and was invented for a good reason. Far too radical and unnecessary to scrap it.
 

dagraham

Well-Known Member
Sep 20, 2005
19,130
46,118
you could just make offside mean offside. Get rid of the interfering/not interfering grey areas and just say all players must be onside for it to count.

Agree, but that would just be reverting to what it was before they meddled with it in the first place. Which is why they will never do it. They want to be innovating, not regressing, even if the ideas they propose are stupid.
 

Lilbaz

Just call me Baz
Apr 1, 2005
41,363
74,893
Like the penalty shoot out idea. I watched the Hockey during the Olympics and their version of a penalty shoot out is similar and imo far more interesting than traditional penalties. Also think the sin bin idea could work.

Don't agree with the rest. The offside rule is too ingrained into football and was invented for a good reason. Far too radical and unnecessary to scrap it.

For me the drama and nerves of a penalty shootout is great. Even if we are england and shit it.
 

Col_M

Pointing out the Obvious
Feb 28, 2012
22,786
45,888
Is the quarter halves to allow for the extra advertising time that would be lost from the drop in the number of games?
 

JerryGarcia

Dark star crashes...
May 18, 2006
8,694
16,028
I love watching penalties when other teams take them but I don't really care if they change to a hockey style system. It would still be entertaining although it could make them easier and the shootout could go on for ages.
 

spurs9

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
11,893
34,370
Like the penalty shoot out idea. I watched the Hockey during the Olympics and their version of a penalty shoot out is similar and imo far more interesting than traditional penalties. Also think the sin bin idea could work.

Don't agree with the rest. The offside rule is too ingrained into football and was invented for a good reason. Far too radical and unnecessary to scrap it.
MLS did something similar to what MVB is suggesting in the 90s and it was excruciating to watch. Here is a link to it and although it would usually be a better standard of player taking it, they would still be fatigued and would be up against better keepers.

Personally, I think extra time should be scrapped. I think it's crazy that 1 team can play 1/3 of a game extra football than their up coming opponents.

 
Top