What's new

Gift Orban

mil1lion

This is the place to be
May 7, 2004
42,676
78,543
The system is clear, it’s exactly the same one he used at Celtic and we need proper wingers for it. Son and Kulusevski are not proper wingers, Son is a wide forward/striker and Kulusevski is a wide 10. If the window closes with the two of them as our starting wingers we’re going to have a tough season, I’ll say it right now. They will be a bigger problem in this system than any lack of form for Richy, they offered him absolutely zero service today which is criminal with how much ball we had
Soloman and Gil are wingers though. Further signings are not always the answer.
 

rabbikeane

Well-Known Member
Mar 29, 2005
6,989
12,836
Great. We need more. This would be my top priority. Son and Kulu were not good enough today.

Might be that it doesn't matter who we sign if manager feel he has to play status names. Son will play a lot no matter how well he does.
 

Flobadob

Well-Known Member
Jul 22, 2014
3,637
12,369
Soloman and Gil are wingers though. Further signings are not always the answer.
Solomon will be fine and I’d rather start him than Son on the wing under Ange tbh. Gil I’m not convinced by whatsoever and he’s got zero chance of getting a look in on the left with Perisic and Solomon ahead of him as back ups. On the right he’s even worse at beating his man on the outside than Kulu and almost exclusively cuts inside. He’s another winger you can put on the pile of no use to us in these circumstances, sounds harsh but he’s got no chance of doing anything for us, won’t get a chance on the left and isn’t much use on the right. We absolutely NEED to sign at least one winger better suited
 

van_Pommel

Well-Known Member
May 10, 2004
3,063
998
Came on here in the hope that an ITK had said the Lukaku news is bollocks. Not sure where to look for that an scared to post in the ITK thread in case I get bansticked 😬
 

felmani26

SC Supporter
Jan 1, 2008
24,679
43,836
Came on here in the hope that an ITK had said the Lukaku news is bollocks. Not sure where to look for that an scared to post in the ITK thread in case I get bansticked 😬
It's Alfredo Pedulla so if he told me the time i'd question it.

File it under bollocks.
 

Matrix

Well-Known Member
Aug 9, 2008
2,924
5,680
It’s okay, he’s not our player. We don’t need to get upset about an observation just yet. Just looking attributes wise. Was only saying I believe the rumoured fee could be used for a surer thing in the wide forward areas
Not upset at all. Just astounded you can write off any player just watching for 45mins.
Says more about you trying to twist it to make out I was butt hurt.
Really weird take.
 

kendoddsdadsdogsdead

Well-Known Member
Aug 29, 2011
2,217
3,757
Not upset at all. Just astounded you can write off any player just watching for 45mins.
Says more about you trying to twist it to make out I was butt hurt.
Really weird take.

Haven’t completely written him off as a player. Just questioning if 30m is the wisest choice for where he plays and the attributes he has. I think we need effective pacey wide players more than a back up/rotation for a CF. He could play there but watching him tonight, not sure he’s a natural for that position. I’ll be honest I’ve probably watched more tonight than the people blindly hoping he signs over a compilation on YouTube.

apologies, I wasn’t trying to twist it, just feels like a lot of the time on here, people are itching to jump on a post that doesn’t immediately come across as positive to white knight or something.
 

Dazzazzad

Well-Known Member
Jan 17, 2006
1,240
4,393
Great. We need more. This would be my top priority. Son and Kulu were not good enough today.
They were not good enough today but may be great in the next game. They have both shown plenty of quality in the shirt so maybe just a bit of patience?

Lo Celso is shit. Now he's great. Emerson shit. Now great. Sanchez shit. Now people are saying we should keep him after 2 decent performances.

It's so reactive.

Let's see who takes to Ange's system and who doesn't. It's been one game!
 

Hotspur_Hero

Well-Known Member
Feb 13, 2012
348
1,008
Haven’t completely written him off as a player. Just questioning if 30m is the wisest choice for where he plays and the attributes he has. I think we need effective pacey wide players more than a back up/rotation for a CF. He could play there but watching him tonight, not sure he’s a natural for that position. I’ll be honest I’ve probably watched more tonight than the people blindly hoping he signs over a compilation on YouTube.

apologies, I wasn’t trying to twist it, just feels like a lot of the time on here, people are itching to jump on a post that doesn’t immediately come across as positive to white knight or something.
Squad-wise, we're desperately thin up top. Richy has had a terrible time with fitness since he was been with us. We bought him in the first place because we needed cover for H. If he gets injured, we don't have a replacement. Sure Son could play there in a pinch, but then we go back to having very little cover on the wings. Ange will make subs, so having 2 or 3 attacking options on the bench seems worthwhile. How many other clubs only have 1 striker on their books? Maybe Veliz is further along than he seems or Ange thinks that Scarlett is ready, but otherwise we need cover for the 9 (whether that is Gift or someone else). I don't disagree that we could use another tricky winger that gets to the touchline, but we also need a 9. It's the only position where we aren't overstocked numerically.

I don't have a strong opinion of GO. I won't pretend to have watched him play much. But his stats are unreal. Unless the scouting team think that his game won't transfer well into our side, he seems like the kind of player we should take a punt on. The 9 is a tough position to fill. Teams are spending huge sums of money for potential. Players with far worse stats (Jackson scored 12/35 in Spain and Hojlund scored 9/32 in Italy) have gone for bigger fees. If he moves to a top 5 league and keeps putting up 1/1 numbers, then they'll be asking 100mil for him instead of 30.
 
Top