- Nov 15, 2010
- 1,378
- 1,894
I'm hearing a lot of pundits saying that this year's PL is poor but I'm not so sure.
At the start of the season plenty of people pointed out that many middle-ranking teams had strengthened by making good buys and that we - ie Spurs - would struggle to achieve fourth place as a result. In the event I think that they were part right in that, yes, those teams did improve and as a result, the league became better. It's just that Spurs improved even more.
That Spurs are having a better season than last year hasn't surprised me. We didn't have any stars at their peak, ready to start the downhill slide; we had plenty of young players we could rightly expect to improve, some decent signings, especially Toby, and a manager who'd settled in and was beginning to look the business. Every reason to believe in a better season than last year. In the event, Alli and Dier have been the unexpected icing on the cake and yet our improvement has only taken us up three places.
Arsenal are where they were last year, so in what respect has the league declined there?
The other three perennial CL teams aren't doing as well by their own standards but does that mean the league itself has declined?
The picture is muddied by the Champions League. I think that the PL is of such a very high standard that it's almost an anchor around the necks of teams wanting to do well. I think that's why Arsenal's form has improved now they're out. I think that Citeh performed well this evening against a supposedly superior PSG because they're no longer candidates for the PL title and just aren't playing as intensely as they would if they were. I think Chelsea and Liverpool both won the CL because they were able to focus their efforts on it because they weren't in the race for the PL. Are there any other examples of teams winning the CL but having so many teams beat them out in their domestic league?
To a lesser extent I think Leicester are benefiting from not having the CL to contend with. That shouldn't be used as a stick to beat them with though, because they don't have the extra luxury of a CL sized squad in the first place.
Looking at it the other way, I think that some of Europe's elite would struggle if they had to compete week in week out in the PL.
I wonder what other people think about the standard of the PL?
At the start of the season plenty of people pointed out that many middle-ranking teams had strengthened by making good buys and that we - ie Spurs - would struggle to achieve fourth place as a result. In the event I think that they were part right in that, yes, those teams did improve and as a result, the league became better. It's just that Spurs improved even more.
That Spurs are having a better season than last year hasn't surprised me. We didn't have any stars at their peak, ready to start the downhill slide; we had plenty of young players we could rightly expect to improve, some decent signings, especially Toby, and a manager who'd settled in and was beginning to look the business. Every reason to believe in a better season than last year. In the event, Alli and Dier have been the unexpected icing on the cake and yet our improvement has only taken us up three places.
Arsenal are where they were last year, so in what respect has the league declined there?
The other three perennial CL teams aren't doing as well by their own standards but does that mean the league itself has declined?
The picture is muddied by the Champions League. I think that the PL is of such a very high standard that it's almost an anchor around the necks of teams wanting to do well. I think that's why Arsenal's form has improved now they're out. I think that Citeh performed well this evening against a supposedly superior PSG because they're no longer candidates for the PL title and just aren't playing as intensely as they would if they were. I think Chelsea and Liverpool both won the CL because they were able to focus their efforts on it because they weren't in the race for the PL. Are there any other examples of teams winning the CL but having so many teams beat them out in their domestic league?
To a lesser extent I think Leicester are benefiting from not having the CL to contend with. That shouldn't be used as a stick to beat them with though, because they don't have the extra luxury of a CL sized squad in the first place.
Looking at it the other way, I think that some of Europe's elite would struggle if they had to compete week in week out in the PL.
I wonder what other people think about the standard of the PL?