- Mar 4, 2021
- 15,467
- 71,714
Oh, please be true!!!
Probably not what people were thinking when the news broke!
Oh, please be true!!!
This presumes they intend to abide by the PSR rules. I’m not convinced they won’t just swallow the points deduction to allow the, to snap up the players they want. Short term pain for a longer term plan.They will have to sell lots of home grown players for very good money before they can buy anyone expensive.
This would be pretty funny but not even the fat Kevin Costner is that stupid.Soccer Ball !! - i really hope so
True, I've heard he's a bit of a tosser.Her brother Wayne is no better....
True story, I went to school with a Wayne Kerr, he was a complete ****Her brother Wayne is no better....
if they sell colwell, gallagher and 1 more they will probably get there....Some news articles reporting a 90m loss last year. 120 odd year before.
Not sure how they are going to meet the 105 (from memory) max loss over a three year period.
bad maths says they need a 105m profit this year then.
Adds credence to what we already knew thanks to @Trix , but seems strange that they’re simultaneously getting strong links to the likes of Osimhen, Williams etc.
"Chelsea’s rivals believe the club need to raise at least £100 million by June 30 to avoid being in risk of a breach. Chelsea have refuted that figure."
Adds credence to what we already knew thanks to @Trix , but seems strange that they’re simultaneously getting strong links to the likes of Osimhen, Williams etc.
This is it, without a dodgy sponsorship deal I can't see it. Chelsea always bled money, they don't make massive amounts from the stadium, no Europe and wages and transfer fees stretched over many years.I think there is no logical way they are not fucked however the way they have been able to meander through years of ambiguity I will wait the official verdict is out!