The thing about putting a large fee on him, if true, is that you can't then turn around and offer below superstar wages and other conditions in contract negotiations with him. If you've planted that flag in the ground regarding a world elite transfer fee, then the salary offer should be of similar heft.
I hope he signs on with us for longer. Big money is handy, but achievement on the pitch would be difficult to maintain and improve upon without him.
Fair enough. I think if we value him at Kane level, then he's gonna be on Kane-level wages.We're offering £200-250k according to that report. Not a small amount.
Fair enough. I think if we value him at Kane level, then he's gonna be on Kane-level wages.
Absurd amounts, but it is what it is.
He isn’t for sale. We don’t want to sell him, hence the crazy asking price. Ergo, not for sale.He is for sale just a question of give us top dollar.
Every player is for sale at the right price if and it's a big if the player wants to go then it's a club's responsibility to get the best price possible but like I say if that is the case.He isn’t for sale. We don’t want to sell him, hence the crazy asking price. Ergo, not for sale.
You'd hope chairman from other clubs would be done trying to negotiate with our Chief.He will get it too lol!!
No, he's for sale when we say, we want to get rid, here's what we want for him. My point is, we have not put him up for sale, because we want to keep him. Just because some clubs could, in theory, offer him a lot of money, doesn't mean he's for sale. Messi at Barca in his prime, was not for sale. I'm running out of ways to express 'he's not for sale', just because someone might want to buy him.Every player is for sale at the right price if and it's a big if the player wants to go then it's a club's responsibility to get the best price possible but like I say if that is the case.
I hear what your saying mate but you can't use Messi as a comparison as he has been at one of the best teams in the world for the past decade and only Madrid are bigger and they would never sell to them so it's not a valid argument for me.No, he's for sale when we say, we want to get rid, here's what we want for him. My point is, we have not put him up for sale, because we want to keep him. Just because some clubs could, in theory, offer him a lot of money, doesn't mean he's for sale. Messi at Barca in his prime, was not for sale. I'm running out of ways to express 'he's not for sale', just because someone might want to buy him.
We're offering £200-250k according to that report. Not a small amount.
Fair enough. I think if we value him at Kane level, then he's gonna be on Kane-level wages.
Absurd amounts, but it is what it is.
No, he's for sale when we say, we want to get rid, here's what we want for him. My point is, we have not put him up for sale, because we want to keep him. Just because some clubs could, in theory, offer him a lot of money, doesn't mean he's for sale. Messi at Barca in his prime, was not for sale. I'm running out of ways to express 'he's not for sale', just because someone might want to buy him.
It's like saying your house is for sale. Because in theory, someone could offer you 3x what it's worth. I think we're not going to agree on this one
If we link wages to transfer value, Neymar cost £195m and earns about £600k a week.
Agree, and like Kane, it needs to be a structured deal where he has to earn it every week, not just turn up. (ALL players, in all teams, in all countries should do this)
Hes's for sale the moment he says he wants to go and won't sign a new contract.
Nothing we can do about it other than get the best deal possible. You can shame Mr Bosmans hand for that.
That's not including Levy's sell on fee.Real Madrid were made aware two months ago that a world-record fee would be needed for Eriksen.
Source: talkSPORT
James Rodriguez was far from established, hence he's no longer there.he's not going to Real Madrid then, they have been investing in very young players recently , last established world class players they bought were James Rodriquez and Toni Kroos in 2014
they also need £500M + to improve their own stadium
The Daily "not the brightest" StarManchester United and Liverpool would be interested in £45m-rated Christian Eriksenfrom Tottenham. (Daily Star)
No, he's for sale when we say, we want to get rid, here's what we want for him. My point is, we have not put him up for sale, because we want to keep him. Just because some clubs could, in theory, offer him a lot of money, doesn't mean he's for sale. Messi at Barca in his prime, was not for sale. I'm running out of ways to express 'he's not for sale', just because someone might want to buy him.
It's like saying your house is for sale. Because in theory, someone could offer you 3x what it's worth. I think we're not going to agree on this one
On sky sports " papers round up"
Manchester United and Liverpool would be interested in £45m-rated Christian Eriksenfrom Tottenham. (Daily Star)
The Daily "not the brightest" Star
Of course the use of words/expressions matter. It’s how we understand and get meaning. Anyway, pointless discussing it, we’re never going to agree.We didn't put Carrick, Berbatov, Modric or Bale up for sale. Does it matter the expression? Other forces than 'he is up for sale' will determine whether he stays or not.