What's new

Player Paulo Dybala

chrissivad

Staff
May 20, 2005
51,646
58,072
If we are waiting for lukakku deal to fall in place then wont man u just wait until the death to sign off just to screw us over?

Could back fire and they are left with Lukaku.

If they only sign off last min, then Inter could still sell to Juve, but if Juve are only going to sell if they can bring in the inter player they might cancle any deal if we can't sign Dybala.
 

GetSpurredOn

Well-Known Member
Jun 18, 2006
5,022
8,922
If Juve are as keen to move him on as they have appeared to be all summer, they know 5pm today is a hard deadline, there can only be so much stalling before it’s too late.
This afternoons meeting should resolve this I think. Juve may just have to take a risk on getting a replacement, but ultimately they have time to work on that, this deal does not have that luxury.
Given the option, selling Dybala or Mandzukic, we know which one brings in most cash. Even allowing for the deal to be a loan initially, there’s no reason we couldn’t make it permanent and transfer funds during the coming week surely, as his registration would already we with us and not require changing outside of the allotted window. Wasn’t this the way Chelsea got round their transfer ban, Kovacic was already on loan and registered with them, so the movement of funds was not the problem. Transferring registration is the only bounding factor, but players already on loan deals get around that.
 

andy00900

Probably Joking
Aug 18, 2017
518
1,113
Not sure why we would pull out, either cant afford the cost of obtaining image rights or cant get it done with time left in the window?
 

austinfh

Well-Known Member
Aug 9, 2016
1,205
7,819
Typical that something like image rights has stopped us from securing our biggest transfer in 25 years :(
 

Mr Pink

SC Supporter
Aug 25, 2010
55,145
100,291
What I don't get is why we didn't try to work out these image rights earlier?

A deal this complex can't be left to the final hours to reach an agreement with so many parties involved.

Surely we should of worked on the image rights first and then haggled with Juve?

And we could of avoided these last minute negotiations if the image rights wernt resolved...
 

Klinsmannesque

Well-Known Member
Jul 26, 2013
900
4,665
why have the meeting? maybe we've said to juve 'have a few hours to sort this out but as it stands we are not moving forward'
 

punkisback

Well-Known Member
Apr 10, 2004
4,417
7,284
What I don't get is why we didn't try to work out these image rights earlier?

A deal this complex can't be left to the final hours to reach an agreement with so many parties involved.

Surely we should of worked on the image rights first and then haggled with Juve?

And we could of avoided these last minute negotiations if the image rights wernt resolved...
"We tried, lessons have been learnt"
 

Kingellesar

This is the way
May 2, 2005
8,764
9,261
There needs to be some seriouls rule changes with all these different third parties involved with footballers.

Absolutely daft that a football player can't join another team to play football because some company no one has ever heard of has image rights on him.
 
D

Deleted member 22380

Can they do a loan with an option to buy?

It buys more time to sort out the image rights issue.
 

EJWTartanSpur

SC Supporter
Jan 29, 2011
4,811
10,104
You have to laugh. Two tweets six minutes apart, Agresti and Ornstein. Both switching to opposite sides.

Sums it all up. Don’t trust a thing 99% of people are saying

I’ll go with Agresti being on the pulse as it seems like he has the top rep and is most up to date with it all
 
Top