- Aug 8, 2019
- 3,486
- 6,581
Why if true does this suprise me dejavuA day where our targets ‘seem’ to be slipping away …
Why if true does this suprise me dejavuA day where our targets ‘seem’ to be slipping away …
Tbh I’m not sure who is going to pay 50 mil for Maddison, it seems it’s primarily between us and Newcastle and neither teams seems to want to go above 40.Hard to see us paying either of those fees isn’t it?
Can you rule out partial ownership?I think we will either sign him or we won’t.
I think I'll win the lottery, sign him and have him play with Legos with me.I think we will either sign him or we won’t.
Lego*I think I'll win the lottery, sign him and have him play with Legos with me.
As long as we can have him on the weekends...Can you rule out partial ownership?
Thank you! I thought I'd heard it like that in a movie or something, so I wasn't sure. In Danish we also just say Lego.Lego*
it is already pluralised
I think whoever gets him it will be somewhere between £39.9 - £49.9MI think whoever gets Maddison it will be somewhere between £40M-£50M
Instead of walking away immediately because we have no intention of paying what's required, we drag it out until the deal collapses of its own accord.It's our super power
Look at what we would want for HarryRice with 2 years left- West Ham want £120M
Mount with 1 year left- Chelsea want £65M
Paulinha who’s had 1 season in the league- Fulham want £90M
Maybe Leicester will look at what’s going on around them and ask for even more. For me Maddison is a much better player than Mount
But then you're missing the pertinent point in that Leicester are in the Championship and need to cut their cloth accordingly without PL TV revenue.Rice with 2 years left- West Ham want £120M
Mount with 1 year left- Chelsea want £65M
Paulinha who’s had 1 season in the league- Fulham want £90M
Maybe Leicester will look at what’s going on around them and ask for even more. For me Maddison is a much better player than Mount