- Aug 6, 2018
- 1,029
- 4,862
According to Transfermarkt, 25 starts and 35 sub appearances. Not sure on the minutes total for each however.Any idea on how many of these are sub appearances?
According to Transfermarkt, 25 starts and 35 sub appearances. Not sure on the minutes total for each however.Any idea on how many of these are sub appearances?
It's a good point. Understanding value of players isn't like that though, I think Herc or trix went through it about 10 pages back.Nobody is arguing that Richarlison isn't somewhat better than Begwijn, he's just not 30m pounds better.
Bergwijn has played 2460 mins for his goal contributions, richarlison played 2528 for his this season. So 68 mins moreAny idea on how many of these are sub appearances?
90% of players are not worth what they go for. Its just the way it is. Club circumstances, demand etc.Nobody is arguing that Richarlison isn't somewhat better than Begwijn, he's just not 30m pounds better.
Has is? I mean we have been linked to him for a couple of weeks no. Ally Gold mentioned him a few times.Didn't one of the itks (herc or Trix) say the forward signing would come out of nowhere? This link definitely has
This whole money thing is pretty irrelevant imoNobody is arguing that Richarlison isn't somewhat better than Begwijn, he's just not 30m pounds better.
Do you not think there are people in a much better position than you to judge how much and where the money is spent ? Like, people with experience of running and managing football clubs?Because we don't have unlimited resources, anything we overpay will take money away from other signings, we've spent big on other players before that we then can't shift and overpaying now means you are accepting a real-world loss in 2 or 3 years unless you find someone willing to overspend. You never want to overpay but you should only do it when there is a risk you are losing out on a special talent if you dont do the deal now (like we did with Modric) or you weaken your rivals directly in the short term. Neither of those reasons apply.
I don't know why you don't care about what we spend. We aren't run by an Oil State, if we were I'd say yes let's do this. Lets get ALL the players but we aren't.
The only reason we should do this is if Conte demands Richarlison as far and away his number 1 choice, so yes I want to see Conte backed as he is a special manager. Reluctantly I would say the manager has got us in a corner if its his number 1 and just pay but I'd try to sell him on alternative options because there are similar level players available for cheaper.
I never understand this argument. We come on here as football fans to share our views.Do you not think there are people in a much better position than you to judge how much and where the money is spent ? Like, people with experience of running and managing football clubs?
If we wish to be a big club, then I'd suggest that it would be helpful to change the thinking about a default starting eleven. I'd suggest that the reason we had one in Conte's first season was that he didn't trust any of the alternatives, certainly after injuries to Skipp, Reguilon and Doherty, and that through failing in cup competitions we were able to concentrate on the Premier League, invoving fewer matches. Hopefully this summer will see the creation of a much larger squad of good quality, and the throwing on the scrapheap of the self-defeating broadcasting of the notion that we won't be able to get a new striker in, because Harry Kane has to play in every game.1. I think it would be helpful to change the thinking about someone outside the default starting XI from "benchwarmer" to "alternate option".
2. You can be against his diving (and you certainly don't ever have to defend it) and still appreciate what he would bring to the table.
That's probably because Calvert-Lewin spends more time being injured and at GQ photoshoots than on the pitch.Never paid too much attention to him but reading Everton fans comments they absolutely love him which surprised me, they know they have to sell either him or Calvert Lewin and pretty much everyone of them wanted to keep richarlison
*Squeezing into his heels and adjusting his bra strap.That's probably because Calvert-Lewin spends more timebeing injuredand at GQ photoshoots than on the pitch.
Personally I’m not sure one can confidentiality say Richarlison is better. Bergwijn has never been given a real chance to build up any consistency, he was mostly used here and there. Richarlison plays every game. Confidence can be massive for attacking players and Bergwijn must have struggled in that regard. Technically speaking Betgwijn is certainly much much better on the ball, Richarlison is not a great dribbler because his balance isn’t great which is why I question his ability to play out wide for us for any real success. In the finishing department from a conversation point of view I’m sure Richarlison is better but again this is were confidence and playing consistently could well play a huge amount.Nobody is arguing that Richarlison isn't somewhat better than Begwijn, he's just not 30m pounds better.
It's a good point. Understanding value of players isn't like that though, I think Herc or trix went through it about 10 pages back.
EDIT: MIght have been on a different thread actually mate.
Personally I’m not sure one can confidentiality say Richarlison is better. Bergwijn has never been given a real chance to build up any consistency, he was mostly used here and there. Richarlison plays every game. Confidence can be massive for attacking players and Bergwijn must have struggled in that regard. Technically speaking Betgwijn is certainly much much better on the ball, Richarlison is not a great dribbler because his balance isn’t great which is why I question his ability to play out wide for us for any real success. In the finishing department from a conversation point of view I’m sure Richarlison is better but again this is were confidence and playing consistently could well play a huge amount.
Overall Bergwijn hasn’t felt settled and supposedly has wanted to leave for over a season so the comparison is somewhat moot as he won’t be staying. But I’m not overly convinced one can say for sure Richarlison is better until we see Bergwijn play regular for a team where he feels settled. Personally I feel some are being unfairly harsh on him.
Nobody is arguing that Richarlison isn't somewhat better than Begwijn, he's just not 30m pounds better.