But not Lucas as well!I'm not that keen on Richarlison but if Winks goes the other way and lowers the price a fair bit, I can live with it.
I think it's just rare to have players who each want to move the opposite direction in footballLoving the creativity of offering players in exchange. As a North American fan, I've never understood why player trades/swaps is not more common.
It's no different in North America, players don't want to be traded from winning teams to losing ones. But they do it regardless. I wonder why the culture is different. Anyway, off-topic I know. I'll stop.I think it's just rare to have players who each want to move the opposite direction in football
I believe it's got to do with the American teams being franchises and the player contracts carrying from team to team.Loving the creativity of offering players in exchange. As a North American fan, I've never understood why player trades/swaps is not more common.
Why not?But not Lucas as well!
99% of the time, players can't say no or veto a trade.It's no different in North America, players don't want to be traded from winning teams to losing ones. But they do it regardless. I wonder why the culture is different. Anyway, off-topic I know. I'll stop.
Richarlison! Good player. Hope we can get something done.
Anthony is an absolute baller but Richarlison ticks a lot of boxes also. Both would be great optionsWe are interested in Richarlision , however there's many more attackers we like too Antony at ajax is one . They want a deal closed quickly to pursue there targets and raise cash .Not at there price currently though clubs monitoring the situation.
Maybe not if we get Eriksen and Richarlison, they may see enough in 5 to cover the front 3 and when we replace Winks we'll have depth to switch to 352 at timesGood thing about shifting Lucas as part of the deal is that we’d almost certainly go for another attacker since Bergwijn is hellbent on going.
Based on my brief internet research, seems like you are right! Labour law huh?I believe it's got to do with the American teams being franchises and the player contracts carrying from team to team.
Which is exactly how the Romans viewed himJesus.
Some like him. Some do not.
Some think he's too expensive. Some do not.
Some think he'll fit in. Some do not.
Blah blah blah
Yeh interesting. As you said, it depends on how they see Perisic. We would need an Eriksen/Paqueta/Maddison type though for sure. As much as I'd like Gil to stay with the squad next season, I doubt Conte thinks he's ready so it would be Richarlison Son Kane Kulu for 4 competitions which is not enough as 1 injury would leave us with 0 attackers on the bench. I can imagine we go for someone like Cornet as a 5th option maybe.Maybe not if we get Eriksen and Richarlison, they may see enough in 5 to cover the front 3 and when we replace Winks we'll have depth to switch to 352 at times
Also Perisic can push up to the attacking 3 so I can see logic if they decide to sell Moura
You could chuck peresic up top If the worst were to happen. I also think we'll buy Traore. Based on nothing just a hunchYeh interesting. As you said, it depends on how they see Perisic. We would need an Eriksen/Paqueta/Maddison type though for sure. As much as I'd like Gil to stay with the squad next season, I doubt Conte thinks he's ready so it would be Richarlison Son Kane Kulu for 4 competitions which is not enough as 1 injury would leave us with 0 attackers on the bench. I can imagine we go for someone like Cornet as a 5th option maybe.