Of course there's no like for like, that's obvious. That's why this whole debate is ongoing, otherwise we'd all know what to do.
Again the only point I'm making here is that we don't need a vaccine for COVID in order to resume "normal" life, including the playing of games in front of crowds.
A vaccine would be great, but like the examples I've mentioned (where there is no vaccine) a vaccine isn't imperative, a cure/effective treatment would also allow everything to get back to "normal".
I know the point you're making, and understand it.
I just don't agree with you on the certainty in which you profess... Basically that getting a vaccine isn't that big a deal in terms of things going back to normal like the way we know it.
The first step is sorting out the remainder of this season and for certain this will be at best completed behind closed doors. We can only hope that plans will be put in place to allow crowds to return, if not immediately then at some point during next season. It's definitely critical that Covid is minimised by the time that we roll around to winter in case there is a flu epidemic.Fair enough, although to be clear I'm not certain we will find a treatment that is effective enough, in the same way I'm not certain we will find a vaccine.
But if we do find a treatment, that for example has a 99% success rate, then surely that would be something that would allow us to have games with crowds again?
June 8th and players aren't even kicking a ball in groups yet. Considering they haven't played for two months, there's going to be some very tired and erratic play if it goes ahead.A number of Premier League club doctors have raised a range of concerns with league bosses over plans to resume the season, BBC Sport has learned.
One issue that the senior medics have sought assurances over includes their own liability and insurance cover if players contract the virus.
The Premier League has also been asked to provide some clarity over medical protocols, testing and player welfare.
The Premier League is hopeful of a potential 8 June resumption.
The 20 club doctors have been holding their own discussions about Project Restart - the label given to plans to resume action - with a view to feeding their thoughts into the Premier League's leadership.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/52536329
June 8th and players aren't even kicking a ball in groups yet. Considering they haven't played for two months, there's going to be some very tired and erratic play if it goes ahead.
If you're craving live football and the Belarusian league isn't doing it for you anymore, the K-League starts on Friday. And here's a guide:
Hopefully there will be links to watch it come Friday night (morning).
I put it as a spoiler because the forum unfurls the entire first post, and it's long...
Not for me.. That would make it even funnier. Liverpool losing the league at this stage would be absolute gold. The fans would never get over it.I'm probably the only one. But I'd rather Liverpool won the league than lost it to City in the year they might finally be held to account for their fraud.
I'm probably the only one. But I'd rather Liverpool won the league than lost it to City in the year they might finally be held to account for their fraud.
If you're craving live football and the Belarusian league isn't doing it for you anymore, the K-League starts on Friday. And here's a guide:
Hopefully there will be links to watch it come Friday night (morning).
I put it as a spoiler because the forum unfurls the entire first post, and it's long...
So BBC are reporting that reducing the minutes in a game is an option. This is the first actual suggestion that challenges the integrity of the game. Football is 90 minutes and more importantly this season has been played for 90 minutes per game so far.