Quaresma or Mancini

[spartiata]

Why don't we try to get on loan Mancini or Quaresma from Inter?!:shrug:

 

[brett.spurs]

Because they're show ponys and won't suit the premier league.

 

[Mornstar]

cos their names don't sound dutch enough

 

[alextheyid]

i dont think its a bad idea..just think we should try and use the resources we've got!

 

[Danners9]

Because they're show ponys and won't suit the premier league.

Ah good, this is what I was going to say!

 

[BPR_U16]

Quarsema spent half last season on loan at Chelski and made a total of 4 appearances (3 of which were as sub) - so why do we think he might be our answer? Deemed not good enough for them, and with lack of playing time cannot see how he can now be good for us.

 

[spurs mental]

Quaresma was muck at Chelsea last season. I saw one game and he was so predictable my granny could have defended against him.

 

[Black]

Both shite ?

 

[donny1013]

I watch a lot of Inter and both players are very much surplus to requirements due to the system that Inter play. Quaresma is hated by the Nerazzurri fans as he has been dire for them and has also rejected two moves to Genoa and also Olympiacos. Mancini is a shadow of the player he was at Roma. Both players strongest position is the RW so i would see it as pretty pointless getting either.

 

[MattyP]

Why don't we not clutter up Spurs chat over the next two days with pointless threads about pointless players who have no link whatsoever with Spurs.

Guys, we have a transfer section of the forum, can we use that as and when we are linked to a player and not create threads just because someone on here likes a particular player.

I like Messi, but have I started a thread on him. No.