What's new

Raphinha

Timberwolf

Well-Known Member
Jan 17, 2008
10,328
50,217
The difference IMO is the quality of the opposition. Arsenal can play a weakened team in their EL games, whereas Spurs will have to play an equally strong team in our CL games. As others have mentioned we have 10 fixtures in October, so there's simply no way we can play Son and Deki in all 10 games. Realistically he could be playing as much as either of them between now and the end of the year.
Yeah I suppose that's even more the case given the absolutely insane schedule we'll have due to the WC. He'd get tons of game-time here too.
 

brasil_spur

SC Supporter
Aug 25, 2006
12,760
16,919
Yeah I suppose that's even more the case given the absolutely insane schedule we'll have due to the WC. He'd get tons of game-time here too.
I think game time is probably equal and at both clubs is up to the player to step it up from a guaranteed starter at a lower league club to a regular for a CL (or not quite CL in the case of the scum) club.

So to me what it comes down to is international exposure - he'll only get that properly in the CL, not the EL.
 

KILLA_SIN

Well-Known Member
May 24, 2008
8,002
14,760
The difference IMO is the quality of the opposition. Arsenal can play a weakened team in their EL games, whereas Spurs will have to play an equally strong team in our CL games. As others have mentioned we have 10 fixtures in October, so there's simply no way we can play Son and Deki in all 10 games. Realistically he could be playing as much as either of them between now and the end of the year.
Thats never worked out v well for us in the EL
 

WiganSpur

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
16,060
32,852
I don't think they'll necessarily sign all those players - that's basically their fans' dream scenario and our fans being overly concerned.

They've had some transfer sagas go on all summer that we assume will come off yet never materialise. Buendia, Aouar, Vlahovic, Maddison, Zaha and plenty of others. Jesus looks like an obvious one, but I wouldn't be at all surprised if they don't sign one or two of Raphinha, Tielemans, or the Ajax defender.

They've averaged about 100m spend for 6 seasons but the most they've ever spent is 150m last season and they have little to show for it. Not sure I can see them going up to 200m - that's Chelsea/City territory.
Yeah, surely 7-8 years of no CL is going to hurt them at some point. I guess 100-150m net isn't too much nowadays but they never seem afraid to splash the cash. Having signed Vieira however, surely they're not going to spend a further £150m or so on Jesus, Raphinha ,Martinez and a CM without some serious outgoings. And in that regard it's hard to see who they could sell who is particularly valuable or in demand. Bellerin, Torreira and Guendouzi I guess?
 

brasil_spur

SC Supporter
Aug 25, 2006
12,760
16,919
Thats never worked out v well for us in the EL
Agreed but the have a paper thin squad right now and the fixture list is mental with the WC coming in November, so what are they going to do? Surely they're not going to risk missing out on CL qualification through the PL again?
 

SpartanSpur

Well-Known Member
Jan 27, 2011
12,560
43,103
Yeah, surely 7-8 years of no CL is going to hurt them at some point. I guess 100-150m net isn't too much nowadays but they never seem afraid to splash the cash. Having signed Vieira however, surely they're not going to spend a further £150m or so on Jesus, Raphinha ,Martinez and a CM without some serious outgoings. And in that regard it's hard to see who they could sell who is particularly valuable or in demand. Bellerin, Torreira and Guendouzi I guess?

I think the Kroenke's have been loaning money to the club to help them spend in the last 2-3 years so it is possible if they keep doing so.

The difference to ENICs investment being that at some point they could try to recall it.
 

Timberwolf

Well-Known Member
Jan 17, 2008
10,328
50,217
Yeah, surely 7-8 years of no CL is going to hurt them at some point. I guess 100-150m net isn't too much nowadays but they never seem afraid to splash the cash. Having signed Vieira however, surely they're not going to spend a further £150m or so on Jesus, Raphinha ,Martinez and a CM without some serious outgoings. And in that regard it's hard to see who they could sell who is particularly valuable or in demand. Bellerin, Torreira and Guendouzi I guess?
I think they've already got 10m for Guendouzi. The other 2 both have 1 year left on their respective contracts so probably around £8-10m each? Beyond that there's Maitland Niles (also 1 year left) and maybe Rob Holding? They can probably just about drum up 50mil if they sell all of them. Hard to see anyone taking Pepe on his wages.

We've got a lot more saleable assets in comparison. If we sold Lo Celso, Bergwijn, Reguilon, Winks and Rodon we should be aiming for at least 80m and that would still leave others like Royal, Tanganga, Ndombele, etc.
 

WiganSpur

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
16,060
32,852
I think they've already got 10m for Guendouzi. The other 2 both have 1 year left on their respective contracts so probably around £8-10m each? Beyond that there's Maitland Niles (also 1 year left) and maybe Rob Holding? They can probably just about drum up 50mil if they sell all of them.
Didn't even realise the contract situations for all those players. And as we've seen over the years, mediocre squad players on decent wages can be a pain in the arse to shift. Can't see them flogging all of them so therefore no way they're bringing in all those players surely? Considering they have Pepe and Saka already, bringing in Raphinha seems nonsensical if you're operating under a limited budget.
 

Timberwolf

Well-Known Member
Jan 17, 2008
10,328
50,217
Didn't even realise the contract situations for all those players. And as we've seen over the years, mediocre squad players on decent wages can be a pain in the arse to shift. Can't see them flogging all of them so therefore no way they're bringing in all those players surely?
It's pretty shocking how poorly their squad has been managed. So many players still knocking about on loan or on the bench that have 1 year left on their contracts. Them and United have a terrible habit of overpaying average players then either offering them new contracts or keeping them for too long so they leave for a pittance or on a free.

But anyway - back to Raphinha. It's not like they can raise loads from sales to pay for him.
 

SpartanSpur

Well-Known Member
Jan 27, 2011
12,560
43,103
65 million pounds is the fee they require to release raphinha from his contact .

Hefty but I think that's simply the market at the moment. If you want someone ready to hit the ground running that's probably what it'll take. Considering we've done well to keep the cost down on Bissouma and Perisic so far we might have scope to overpay on a target or two.

I wonder if you could reach that magic figure with add ons.
 

Timberwolf

Well-Known Member
Jan 17, 2008
10,328
50,217
65 million pounds is the fee they require to release raphinha from his contact .
That's a fee that makes perfect sense for Leeds tbh. Much less and they may as well keep him another season.

I imagine something like 50+10 or 55+5 would be about our limit. Can't see us paying the full 65.
 

spursfan77

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2005
46,701
105,002
65 million pounds is the fee they require to release raphinha from his contact .
do-it-come-on.gif
 

hughy

I'm SUPER cereal.
Nov 18, 2007
31,973
57,284
I don't blame Leeds for holding out. When was the last time they had an asset this valuable in their club? Ferdinand?
 
Top