What's new

Sandro + Paulinho doesn't work

Lufti

Well-Known Member
Jan 3, 2013
7,994
16,635
Their attacking/passing skillset is too similar.

It has to be Dembele+1. Especially at home.

I think in the formations we've been lining up with, Paulinho's natural position doesn't exist. He's also quite similar to Luiz Gustavo but they played well together in the Brazilian set up
 

guate

Well-Known Member
May 12, 2005
3,270
1,486
As much as we all love The Beast I suspect that Capoue will become a better option in the future as his passing skills appeared to be of a better standard. Hopefully he'll be back soon and get a decent run of games.
 

absolute bobbins

Am Yisrael Chai
Feb 12, 2013
11,656
25,971
It has to be none of them, no player in our entire squad is above criticism or beyond reproach! Besides, Mousa has become far too adept at the pointless sideways pass to justify a starting spot at the moment
 

Gbspurs

Gatekeeper for debates, King of the plonkers
Jan 27, 2011
26,985
61,897
Their attacking/passing skillset is too similar.

It has to be Dembele+1. Especially at home.

You managed to deduce this based on the two times they have started together in the league (both times we won by the way)? Outstanding.
 

Ghost Hardware

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
18,405
63,427
I don't think Paulinho and Sandro are the problem, it's the lack of movement and clever passing in front of them that is. They are in the line up to be work horses not clever technical players.
 

idontgetit

Well-Known Member
Aug 21, 2011
14,518
31,068
Dembele's passing is worse than Paulinho's so don't know what you think it will solve. They're also completely different players so I don't know where you getting than from. Sandro's an out and out DM. Paulinho is a classy all round box to box midfielder. Dembele's a powerful midfielder with awesome strength on the ball, great close control and a strong shot but next to no vision and average passing skills.
 

Hoddle&Waddle

Well-Known Member
Nov 25, 2012
8,348
17,585
Think we need to give it more time before we say "it doesn't work", I mean how many times has Paulinho actually played with Sandro? Not many times.
 

Hoddle&Waddle

Well-Known Member
Nov 25, 2012
8,348
17,585
interesting point.

he's only a good passer in the last 30 minutes of games...more space?

early stages are always backwards and sideways passing.
Not saying Paulinho is a great passer, thats not his game, just better than Dembele. Although it's a fair argument that we still need a 'deep lying playmaker' type, that would speed up our play. Capoue or Holtby could be the answer (better passers) but personally I would like us to bring in someone like Pjanic (easier said than done).
 

JAYSTAR

Well-Known Member
Aug 25, 2012
3,318
3,804
I actually agree with this point. Dembele and Sandro are a good fit and Dembele and Paulinho with decent overlapping wingbacks, but Pauly likes to sit too high up the pitch normally which puts too much distance between him and Sandro.

When Paulinho does track back his passes are short and often backward and he slows things down a lot. I prefer it when Dembele simply turns a player and carries the ball forward. Also, Dembele is not keen on pushing up, which is good in a two man midfield and so as much as I love both Sandro and Paulinho I don't think they give us as much solidity AND link up without Dembele partnering one of them. Keeping them all happy is gonna be very difficult. Anyway, a lot of it also depends on who is playing at 10. Eriksen stays in position, but Holtby drifts.
 

mpickard2087

Patient Zero
Jun 13, 2008
21,894
32,582
I think both Dembele and Paulinho can be guilty of dicking about with the ball instead of passing it on quickly, more touches = more time for the defence to get set.

However, surely if you want to play a possession based game you drum it into their skulls about the need for a minimum of touches, constant movement and quick interchanges?... And this brings me onto my main point, I don't think chopping and changing personnel in the centre and attacking midfield positions is the answer. Its the mentality, tactics and instructions from the manager/coaching team that need to sharpen up in my opinion.
 

Lufti

Well-Known Member
Jan 3, 2013
7,994
16,635
The bigger problem is that as a unit the players aren't working well together..

Sandro likes to get the ball and drive forward, but without movement ahead of him or options on the wings, he either loses it or has to turn back
Paulihno likes to take the ball off the defenders toes and then pick out someone in front of him, but the trouble is, again, there's a lack of movement and he should be an option for the defenders who should be bringing the ball up (though in the last game he was often waiting for the ball in a too advanced position, meaning Sandro/Chiriches had to try and carry it up himself or Holtby had to drop deep)
Dembele as others mentioned is a sideways passer, yes he can beat a man better than most, but when he does get into a good position he usually makes a bad decision..
Holtby likes to ping the ball about with quick passes, often returning the ball to where it came from and then moving, but as the whole five man midfield isn't moving around and doing the same thing, the play just slows down and has to start again
Townsend likes to carry the ball from deep rather than getting in behind the opponent's defence, which, while has been useful and probably our most effective attacking strategy so far, makes it hard for other players to pass to play the ball into him in a dangerous area
Lennon just has a lack of movement off the ball and is only really effective when his full back is pushing up with him and causing a problem for the opponent's defence, which in the last game Walker wasn't doing as he was playing almost as a CM half the time when we had the ball
As for the others, Sigurdsson tucks in too much and waits for the ball, Lamela I can't really judge because of a lack of game time, and Eriksen probably does something which Holtby is also guilty of, dropping too deep to try and influence the play, but effectively nullifying the attacking threat by reducing the number of men forward

But that's my onion of course..
 

ItsBoris

Well-Known Member
Jan 18, 2011
7,945
9,349
Paulinho imo was bought for and suits the 4-3-3 formation. I don't think his best position is in a double pivot, he should be higher up the pitch.

I thought our midfield with Capoue, Dembele, and Paulinho looked really good against Swansea so I wouldn't mind us playing that against better teams, and maybe have Eriksen or Holtby in for Dembele against weaker teams.
 

dagraham

Well-Known Member
Sep 20, 2005
19,146
46,140
I think the problem is that we simply don't have enough quality passers of the ball in the squad. We've got Eriksen, Holtby and err.... now I'm struggling.
 

Legend10

Well-Known Member
Jul 8, 2006
10,847
5,277
1 1/2 premiership games together, won both and it obviously doesn't work!

Pheeeeeeeeew, it's fun being a Spurs fan in 2013!

You venture on here after we lose 3-0 to West Ham to read people screaming it has to be Sandro & Paulinho, 2 games and 2 wins later with Sandro & Paulinho apparently it now doesn't work with Sandro & Paulinho.
 

mil1lion

This is the place to be
May 7, 2004
42,539
78,166
Nonsense. Paulinho gets forward way more than Sandro so they are not too similar. The biggest issue we have is that we don't stretch play enough to create space for him to get into. He looks most threatening late on in games when the opposition are worn out and leave space. The wingers come infield all the time and it gets too congested in there for him.
 
Top