What's new

Stellini demands ‘attacking football’ to secure Champions League spot

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Aug 20, 2003
9,263
11,308
I know it’s been said by many on here but just go with Kane & Son up top and drop Kulu into an ACM. Mix it up a bit, it really is that simple.
 

theShiznit

Well-Known Member
Jul 26, 2004
17,902
23,969
Cue us paying like the Simpsons parody of "soccer"
EnormousUnfitChuckwalla-size_restricted.gif

Wing to centre, centre to wing... Etc.

Will believe it when I see it.
 

parj

NDombelly ate all the pies
Jul 27, 2003
3,625
5,955
Didn't people say that's what Conte wanted to but the players didn't get it? Same again then
 

parj

NDombelly ate all the pies
Jul 27, 2003
3,625
5,955
I know it’s been said by many on here but just go with Kane & Son up top and drop Kulu into an ACM. Mix it up a bit, it really is that simple.
Just go 433. Drop a centre back and put in another midfielder like Sarr
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Aug 20, 2003
9,263
11,308
Just go 433. Drop a centre back and put in another midfielder like Sarr
There you go another option! We’ve actually got quite a few! Trouble is who plays with Romero as I wouldn’t trust Lenglet or Dier without protection
 

slartibartfast

Grunge baby forever
Oct 21, 2012
18,320
33,955
Cue us paying like the Simpsons parody of "soccer"
EnormousUnfitChuckwalla-size_restricted.gif

Wing to centre, centre to wing... Etc.

Will believe it when I see it.
Lost count of how many times myself and others have posted that over the last 4 years. Sad its true.
Playing like that with Kane and Son in your team, absolute disgrace.
 

tcyrus

Well-Known Member
Dec 7, 2006
1,672
817
I know it’s been said by many on here but just go with Kane & Son up top and drop Kulu into an ACM. Mix it up a bit, it really is that simple.
you forget we have a young pro in Alifie Devine who can play that role,
lets give the kid a go.
 

cliff jones

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
4,094
6,668
There you go another option! We’ve actually got quite a few! Trouble is who plays with Romero as I wouldn’t trust Lenglet or Dier without protection
it’s hardly without protection with the three suggested in CM- probably Skipp would be the better anchor in there than the other two
 

jolsnogross

Well-Known Member
May 17, 2005
3,781
5,530
The 'protection' talk is exactly why this 5 at the back system needs binning as soon as we have a new man in charge. 3 centre halves, 'protecting' each other. And they 'protect' wing backs. And nobody takes responsibility to win individual duels, while all the 'protectors' stay behind the ball and never break the lines. It's a bloody nonsense, encouraging a team of flakes to sit back, invite teams on to their layers of 'protection', pass sideways and backwards, and bore the pants off everyone.

Attacking footy would be very welcome, but it wont be happening with this interim coaching staff.
 

JAYSTAR

Well-Known Member
Aug 25, 2012
3,318
3,804
I know it’s been said by many on here but just go with Kane & Son up top and drop Kulu into an ACM. Mix it up a bit, it really is that simple.
It really is. We should be playing 532 and allowing our front two to just attack and not worry about coming back to defend. The old counter style of Kane and Son destroyed teams, with Kane winning the ball in midfield and playing Son in behind the oppo defence. With Conte's stupid system the two wide forwards spend half their time tracking back and pretending to tackle, while the middle 2 CMs get completely overrun. Its ridiculous that the managers can't see what's happening.
I would be happy with Hojbjerg sitting as CDM and letting Kulu sit in centrally next to Skipp. Or to just play Sarr instead with Kulu and Danjuma coming off the bench in attack if we need them.
 

Tony-Bish

Well-Known Member
Jul 3, 2003
137
285
The 'protection' talk is exactly why this 5 at the back system needs binning as soon as we have a new man in charge. 3 centre halves, 'protecting' each other. And they 'protect' wing backs. And nobody takes responsibility to win individual duels, while all the 'protectors' stay behind the ball and never break the lines. It's a bloody nonsense, encouraging a team of flakes to sit back, invite teams on to their layers of 'protection', pass sideways and backwards, and bore the pants off everyone.

Attacking footy would be very welcome, but it wont be happening with this interim coaching staff.
I agree, have a spare man protecting means they have someone in space. When I played we man marked and were responsible for our player and it was still possible to cover for your team mates if they got beaten.
 
Top