What's new

The Case for Frank de Boer

Status
Not open for further replies.

nicdic

Official SC Padre
Admin
May 8, 2005
41,857
25,920
Here's a warning (in the shape of an article from WhoScored?) for all who after wanting AVB out have turned their hopes and dreams to FDB.

Team Focus: Explaining Ajax's Style Under De Boer
by Mohamed Moallim

The secret of long-term success lies in cultivating a distinctive set of values, as Jim Collins put forward in his bestseller "Good to Great". This usually means promoting from within and laying down deep local roots. It’s advice that has been followed in Amsterdam; next month Frank de Boer will reach a historic milestone, serving three years as manager of Ajax.

Now to some this wouldn't be given the time of day, but considering he'll only be the fourth man to do so since the inception of the Eredivisie (after Rinus Michels, Louis van Gaal and Ronald Koeman), it's a feat worth commemorating. Under his stewardship he's kept an ever-changing squad competitive – winning three consecutive championships – and it's all down to resurrecting their "traditional approach".

It's the way they've adapted to losing individuals – some of whom were important than others – on a yearly basis, not allowing it to faze them, that has seen De Boer's profile rise. His first starting ever eleven – against AC Milan (December 6, 2010) – contained four current Premier League players: Maarten Stekelenburg, Jan Vertonghen, Christian Eriksen and Luis Suárez, plus Gregory van der Wiel – a World Cup finalist – and Toby Alderweireld now at Atlético Madrid.

From the onset it was clear that his coaching philosophy of one-touch, combination football heavily based on possession and positional interchange - in other words a modernised / watered down version of totaalvoetbal – had been shaped by Louis van Gaal and Johan Cruyff. He enjoyed success with the former at Ajax and Barcelona, whilst the latter played an important role during his youth career.

In essence De Boer has combined the Cruijffianen and Van Gaalisten Schools – individual and collectivism intertwined. Each individual's strength combines to make a unified eleven: the whole is greater than the sum of its parts – to implement his own vision. Within his system, every position – thereby player – is assigned with several basic tasks to carry out with our without the ball (so if you lose Vertonghen someone like Niklas Moisander can step in and carry out the same duties).

Dennis Bergkamp, current assistant manager, noted in his autobiography that under Van Gaal the system was sacred and every player was equal. This has rubbed off on De Boer. There's no dependency on one or two individuals. "This is mainly down to the slick collective spirit Frank de Boer has forged," Sjoerd Mossou wrote in Algemeen Dagblad. Every player contributes collectively. "Football is a team sport," De Boer would remind you.

Teamwork is fundamental to De Boer. Universality is essential. Players need to be comfortable in multiple positions and roles. A facet integral to their positional interchange game is that once an area is vacated a teammate drops in – maintaining the shape (either 3-1-4-2 or 2-1-4-3) – a style of play familiar to De Boer. Individuality is also important. During each match his players are left to their own problem solving devices. "Players should not just run with their legs, but with their head as well," as Guus Hiddink once said. Individual-based training (or the 'Michels model') has helped.

De Boer, like his mentors, doesn't believe in adapting to the opponent but rather playing his own game. The aim of each game is to dominate through possession; circulation football is used as a means to not only create goalscoring opportunities but also as a defensive weapon. If you have the ball the opposition can't harm you. No team boasts a higher average in the Eredivisie when it comes to possession (62.8%) and Ajax have attempted over a thousand more passes than any other side (7917), with an accuracy of 87.8%.

To some keeping the ball is frowned upon. On a few occasions Ajax have even been labelled 'boring', but for De Boer it's everything, and not just because it's the only way he knows how to play. The simple truth is that without it his side isn't very good. However, there's something important which is often overlooked: keeping possession conserves energy. His team seldom passes more than ten metres during a build-up phase, letting the ball do the running, but every pass needs to be precise: it must be a metre ahead, never into feet, this way the circulation is kept flowing. It’s little surprise that Ajax have played a higher proportion of their passes sideways (58.4%) than any other team.

It's also used to break down stubborn opposition. The majority of sides they face play in a compact 6-3-1 formation: the general idea being to make the pitch small, suffocate their creative players, and hit them on the break. To counter that, the centre-backs play a key role by constructing from the back. Stefano Denswil (104.4),Joël Veltman (98) and Moisander (95.4) are averaging the most passes per game in the division.

Ajax only play horizontally after a vertical pass; a case in point being when the centre-backs go out with ball, opening up the field and moving wider so the right or left-back can join the midfield line. De Boer has talked about it: the centre backs provoke the opponent, invite them forward, then if the opponent applies quick pressure the ball goes to the other central defender who then makes a vertical pass.


This leads us to another Van Gaalisten concept he's incorporated: 'pressure play'. Ajax press the moment they lose possession, seen as the perfect time because the opposing player who has just won the ball is vulnerable. He's wasted energy to win it. Possession needs to be regained in three seconds, usually by forming a wall of three behind the player closing down. If they haven't won it back, instead of falling back and regrouping, they move up the pitch using a high defensive line and forming a compact ten-man wall.

Once they’ve won possession the job is to keep the ball, controlling the ebb and flow until a gap appears (normally through the opposition becoming tired). Subsequently each attack is built patiently with the desire to finish with a sweeping move – a higher percentage of their total chances created have come from open play than any other team (83.8%).

Peerless man-management has allowed everything to come to fruition; with the average age of the side in the early 20s. De Boer’s duties have extended far beyond simply coaching, stating, "You're effectively a surrogate dad." He's not a totalitarian like Van Gaal but isn't afraid to crack the whip either. A typical free-thinking Amsterdammer, even though he was born in Hoorn, the coach is a fundamentalist in every sense of the word.

With a four-year extension having been signed De Boer's aim is to follow in his predecessors’ footsteps from an ideological point-of-view. Michels, Cruyff and Van Gaal, in their respective eras, moulded Ajax into their image, leaving a legacy which is still breathlessly spoken of today. His revolutionary act of re-implementing their ideals – as well as adding a few of his own to combat the tribulations of 21st century life – has given him a chance to do that.

source: http://www.whoscored.com/Articles/c8-iteclvkemlnbost07qg/Show
 

nicdic

Official SC Padre
Admin
May 8, 2005
41,857
25,920
  • Thread starter
  • Admin
  • #2
For those who can't read or are lazy, the summary is that his style is incredibly similar to AVB's. So similar that if you wanted AVB out for style reasons, championing Frank de Boer as his replacement goes a long way to showing how foolish you are.

Merry Christmas! :wtf:
 

HoltbiusMac

ScroobiusMac
Jun 25, 2013
817
2,222
Why is it a warning?
There's nothing wrong with a lot of the ideas that De Boer and AVB share it was just that under AVB passing wasn't good enough, some players appeared to be uncomfortable or played in sub-optimal roles and he showed a lack of flexibility.
I've got no problem with a coach coming in who wants to play a similar style but feels they can get better results out of the squad with a few clearly identified tweaks - be it in personnel or tactics.

Edit: Or do you mean a warning that he has no intention of leaving?
 

Beni

Well-Known Member
Mar 3, 2004
5,436
6,157
Don't want him, another risk in my opinion. We need an experienced manager who has won silverware and has premiership experience. My choice would be Benitez, but not sure he would leave Napoli
 

TaoistMonkey

Welcome! Everything is fine.
Staff
Oct 25, 2005
32,629
33,579
For those who can't read or are lazy, the summary is that his style is incredibly similar to AVB's. So similar that if you wanted AVB out for style reasons, championing Frank de Boer as his replacement goes a long way to showing how foolish you are.

Merry Christmas! :wtf:

If he does get hired I feel sorry for him already!
 

robin09

Well-Known Member
Jun 4, 2005
6,800
7,697
That's the first analysis I've read of FDB's coaching methods. It does sound remarkably like AVB's style. I don't think he'd leave Ajax to come to us, to assume we're a bigger club is maybe slightly big headed. Even if Eriksen and Jan saw it that way.
 

raf18

Well-Known Member
Aug 29, 2006
2,502
1,819
The result can be a whole lot different if he just plays the right players, even if it is the same system.
 

DEFchenkOE

Well-Known Member
Feb 13, 2006
10,527
8,052
There was nothing drastically wrong with AVB's methods. It needed tweaking here and there and he needed to make better personnel decisions but in the main his ideas were good.

I've got no doubt that with the players we have we'd be able to work in a way that FdB wants, it's just that he has no experience whatsoever of playing or managing in England so it's going to be a gamble.
 

dudu

Well-Known Member
Jan 28, 2011
5,314
11,048
For those who can't read or are lazy, the summary is that his style is incredibly similar to AVB's. So similar that if you wanted AVB out for style reasons, championing Frank de Boer as his replacement goes a long way to showing how foolish you are.

Merry Christmas! :wtf:

I hear you, but just because he has the same philosophy it doesnt mean he will be completely against adapting that philiosphy further to suit the players we have at our disposal i.e the article doesnt really speak of a high line as such. Perhaps he is also just better at adapting that style of play.

Or maybe not. The main gripe i had with AVB's style was not with the sideways passing and
possession, it was how he went about turning that possesion into goals..... not using width for a large portion of this season etc. Again i dont read anything above about inverted wingers and men in the no 10 role. Just that he has a philosophy similar to that of AVB.


Im not saying im for or against him, just that they are not the same man.
 

van_Pommel

Well-Known Member
May 10, 2004
3,062
993
One thing that stuck out for me in there was how the Ajax system allows them to lose important players every year and rarely decline in quality of performance. We lose, and will continue to lose our key players every year until we have this fabled new stadium built and are a CL regular. So a philosophy like this is exactly what we should be trying to do (and hopefully are).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top