What's new

The Daily ITK Discussion Thread - 20th June 2022

Status
Not open for further replies.

Archibald&Crooks

Aegina Expat
Admin
Feb 1, 2005
55,623
205,400
a&c-1.jpg

Good mo ning. A new th ead was equi ed so he e it is.

Hopefully we'll soon have some ITK for eve yone to discuss, until then, t y to est ain you selves. emembe the ules!
 
Jan 28, 2011
5,699
79,488
I've said before that it's really easy to solve cryptics, but bloody difficult actually getting them right.

However, if this is a cryptic and it consists of typewritten sentences lacking R, then there is one solution that offers itself.

If we are lacking R, then we need a player who has R or, if you will, Hazard.

I can't believe we're linked, and so don't think this is right, but he's a former Conte player and so I offer it up as a possible solution.
 

Tucker

Shitehawk
Jul 15, 2013
31,435
147,237
No R’s? First thing that spwings to mind is Tony Angelino fwom Only Fools and Horses.

Angelino is a left wing back who plays for RB Leipzig.
 

TheWook

Here
Jan 8, 2021
1,020
4,111
No R’s = R’s nil
Jesus coming to us not them up the road?

edit: this doesn’t work unless the ‘r’ in ‘for’ is there by mistake ?
 
Last edited:

JW72

Well-Known Member
Jan 29, 2011
722
3,264
I've said before that it's really easy to solve cryptics, but bloody difficult actually getting them right.

However, if this is a cryptic and it consists of typewritten sentences lacking R, then there is one solution that offers itself.

If we are lacking R, then we need a player who has R or, if you will, Hazard.

I can't believe we're linked, and so don't think this is right, but he's a former Conte player and so I offer it up as a possible solution.
Probably Micky Hazard though :LOL:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top