Or it could for the right reasons and the right direction.I get really concerned regarding possible takeover bids. Being taken over doesn't nescessiairily mean being taken in the right direction or for the right reasons.
It would be just our luck if we finally got rid of ENIC but the new owners didn't fancy Ange,
Urgh. Does this mean we have to start the circular discussion about whether middle east sports washing money is good for the club or not again?
Oh come on!!Was deleted for a reason. I don't think we should discuss it
All I would like to know, was it on the positive side?Was deleted for a reason. I don't think we should discuss it
To be fair there’s no reason for that to be circular discussion. From an on the pitch stand point it would almost certainly be hugely positive. There are excellent reasons to be very wary of it from a sportswashing perspective. How you balance the two is up to individuals but I think both statements are pretty much inarguableUrgh. Does this mean we have to start the circular discussion about whether middle east sports washing money is good for the club or not again?
Well quite. maybe I'm just being unreasonably cynical.Or it could for the right reasons and the right direction.
Just for the sake of balance.
It was more general musings going from Ange to Kane to Levy and then about Joe Lewis with the thoughts of him relinquishing his controlling stake but nothing of substance to particularly add to the conversation here - just thought it striking they even mentioned him potentially relinquishing control after seeing Trix's message 'tis all.what did they say on talksport then? is there a link or something?
What makes you say that. presumably if there are murmurings then things have already been disucssed ?Cannot see it happening this summer, wheels would've already been in motion if so these things take ages.
what did they say on talksport then? is there a link or something?
Or experienced in the ways of Spurs…Well quite. maybe I'm just being unreasonably cynical.