What's new

Tottenham Takeover Talk

Would you welcome a 25% ownership stake for Qatar Sports Investments (QSI)?

  • Yes

    Votes: 655 65.2%
  • No

    Votes: 350 34.8%

  • Total voters
    1,005
  • Poll closed .

TOLBINY

Well-Known Member
Feb 4, 2019
1,214
2,790
Levy won't want to let go - he has spent 20+ years doing all the hard stuff regarding the infrastructure so he will want to hang around to (hopefully) see the glory on the pitch.
 

Stuart Leathercock

Well-Known Member
Jul 20, 2021
516
1,418
Wrong. Our matchday revenue AND commercial revenue were both higher than Chelsea. Their overall revenue was only higher due to being in the CL for that season while we were in the Conference league.

Our base revenues are now higher than Chelsea. On an even footing (ie. both in CL or both not), we have higher revenue than them.

We also have a £1 billion plus asset, our brand new stadium.
Apologies. You are correct I see that our commercial revenue just jumped ahead of Chelsea in the most recent accounts.(£182m to £177m).

One thing that people aren't considering in the valuations is prestige value. This is where our brand is lacking compared to the other members of the big 6.
 

JonnySpurs

SC Veteran
Jun 4, 2004
5,346
12,398
Surely as Spurs fans there's only one NBA franchise you could possibly be allowed to support...

The funny part is that I absolutely loathe the San Antonio Spurs. They were a bitter rival of the Suns for a long time. Less so these days as the Spurs are finally a bit crap.

I picked my American sports teams due to a particular player. It was Barkley that drew me to the Suns and Reggie Bush/Drew Brees that drew me to the Saints (NFL).
 

chas vs dave

Well-Known Member
Jul 17, 2008
5,417
21,971
Levy won't want to let go - he has spent 20+ years doing all the hard stuff regarding the infrastructure so he will want to hang around to (hopefully) see the glory on the pitch.
If he was desperate to see glory, then he'd have to push the boat out. He's too risk adverse for that
 

DenverSpur

Well-Known Member
Sep 25, 2011
1,996
5,619
You do understand that this deal means we pay, as a club, about £250m to Levy and £500m to Lewis? And in return get a change to a consortium who are also explicitly about making a profit?

My personal preference is Levy stops having anything to do with football operations, but this really is not a worthwhile trade-off at all.
This is the self centered nativity of football fans who believe someone should buy their club for millions or billions but not make a profit from their investment. They’re businessmen not charities.
 

SirHarryHotspur

Well-Known Member
Aug 9, 2017
5,160
7,703
Sorry I assumed you actually read the financials. The club hold those interests, not ENIC. And, having "planning permission" does hold value - as it firms up the ability to actually realize the monetary value of development, rather than an intangible concept of development.

View attachment 122733
Know nothing about company finances and how it all works but checked out the accounts of three of the companies listed above, assume rest are the same, the ones checked were Stardare , THFC Women and THFC Stadium, in each accounts it has a section that begins "The ultimate controlling party is ENIC Sports & Development Holdings Limited , 303 Shirley St , Nassau"
Just wonder if ENIC would sell the lot or certain sections of the club.

PS All ENIC haters off to the Bahamas and parade up and down outside 303 Shirley St with your protest banners. :)
 

fecka

Well-Known Member
Jun 24, 2013
2,337
6,444
Levy won't want to let go - he has spent 20+ years doing all the hard stuff regarding the infrastructure so he will want to hang around to (hopefully) see the glory on the pitch.
Having him as a commercial- or property director could be a great move, keeping him long-term as a chairman would be less enthusiastic. A short handover period is fairly normal from what I know though
 

Marty

Audere est farce
Mar 10, 2005
40,188
63,947
The funny part is that I absolutely loathe the San Antonio Spurs. They were a bitter rival of the Suns for a long time. Less so these days as the Spurs are finally a bit crap.

I picked my American sports teams due to a particular player. It was Barkley that drew me to the Suns and Reggie Bush/Drew Brees that drew me to the Saints (NFL).
As I'm not even remotely US based I chose Spurs for the name, and stayed with them because of Tim Duncan. The fact that they were successful didn't even enter my mind.
 

SandroClegane

Well-Known Member
Jun 27, 2012
3,717
13,842
Kind of offensive that Najafi is being compared to the State-led bids like Qatar and Abu Dhabi when he is a successful businessman and investor and not backed by a government.

His nationality really doesn't mean much in this situation. Seems like it's not dirty money and that he's been successful in his ownership stakes of other teams. I'd welcome this and think it would be an ideal situation comparatively.
 

JonnySpurs

SC Veteran
Jun 4, 2004
5,346
12,398
As I'm not even remotely US based I chose Spurs for the name, and stayed with them because of Tim Duncan. The fact that they were successful didn't even enter my mind.

That's fair, I'm pretty sure I didnt even know they existed when I first picked the Suns and once I'm in, there is no wavering on my part so I couldn't have changed anyway.

Also, please forgive me for calling your NBA team a bit crap :ROFLMAO:
 

Stuart Leathercock

Well-Known Member
Jul 20, 2021
516
1,418
Know nothing about company finances and how it all works but checked out the accounts of three of the companies listed above, assume rest are the same, i.e Stardare , THFC Women and THFC Stadium, in each accounts it has a section that begins "The ultimate controlling party is ENIC Sports & Development Holdings Limited , 303 Shirley St , Nassau"
Just wonder if ENIC would sell the lot or certain sections of the club.

PS All ENIC haters off to the Bahamas and parade up and down outside 303 Shirley St with your protest banners. :)
I think we'd have to take a look at the assets owned by each of those entities before deciding that they are all loaded with development opportunities anyway. While the stadium was being constructed a lot of the properties surrounding the stadium were sold to companies that are not part of THFC at 'fair value' prior to any planning gain. We do know that Levy doesn't think it is viable to develop the hotel and properties on the South podium at present, so the value of that potentially developable land probably isn't huge.
 

Marty

Audere est farce
Mar 10, 2005
40,188
63,947
That's fair, I'm pretty sure I didnt even know they existed when I first picked the Suns and once I'm in, there is no wavering on my part so I couldn't have changed anyway.

Also, please forgive me for calling your NBA team a bit crap :ROFLMAO:
The only reason I think the US closed shop franchise system works as a concept is that all teams will at some point go through spells where they are a bit crap and need to rebuild. Spurs had a better run at the top than most, now it's their turn.
 

Harrier

Well-Known Member
May 20, 2021
1,776
5,203
Not surprising we want a similar price to what Boehly & co paid for Chelsea seeing our revenues and all the assets the club holds. We'll see what happens
Especially when you consider the quality of our stadium and training ground against others.
 

mil1lion

This is the place to be
May 7, 2004
42,493
78,074
I've been a Suns fan since the Seven Seconds or Less era (Joe Johnson's last season or two), Steve Nash was my favourite player.

Book is now No.1 in my heart.
Isn't Steve Nash a Spurs fan too? I wonder if he would be involved in part investment. No idea if that makes sense but its an interesting link to the Suns.
 
Top