What's new

Tottenham Vs Fulham: Match Thread

markiespurs

SC Supporter
Jul 9, 2008
11,899
15,576
Thought we were a bit lucky with the result today and we could easily have lost 4-3 if not for some top class saves from Lloris.
 

jezz

Well-Known Member
Aug 21, 2013
5,654
8,672
Sherwood's gone so who cares?
Everybody knows it and so do the player's.
If he's got any balls he will walk instead of being pushed.
He's a PR nightmare.
 

Sweetsman

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2011
6,673
6,588
Watching the Blue Scum game and the Mackems have had a few chances. Ramires should have been sent off. Finally, Wickham looks like he's been following a kebab diet.
 

rupsmith

Well-Known Member
Jul 29, 2006
1,714
2,328
They both exercised their free speech, yet one of them chose to publicly state the worst thing any footballer doesn't want to hear : that he's not good enough. I have no idea how you're okay with this.

Dont take only a few words - not good enough "at the moment". The words in quotes are important
 

Gaz_Gammon

Well-Known Member
Apr 16, 2005
16,047
18,013
In general no player who wants to continue to play football professionally will come out and blatantly say they are not happy with their manager. Few are as unprofessional and dumb as sherwood.


I ask once again provide evidence, not bullshit. You can't see.

By all means hate, but don't talk crap.
 

CheeseGromit

Well-Known Member
Aug 22, 2013
747
584
I thought we were completely clueless today, no game plan,no bite etc. It looked like the players just sorted it out between themselves

Disappointed this has not been discussed further
Under AVB we were turgid and sterile

Under TS we play a fairly simple schoolboy type game. I have hardly seen a first half worth watching this season especially at home (will Danny give me half my money back ?). Good teams are / will be out of sight before we get our act together

TS does not need to know players that well to get them working hard as a unit and playing for each other
 

DogsOfWar

Well-Known Member
Jan 12, 2005
2,303
3,645
Look, this is you opinion based on what?

Were you at the training sessions this week?

Just because you have a Sandro poster on your bedroom wall doesn't mean that Sherwood should pick him. He has picked a winning team again, and had we lost or drawn you would have had a valid argument. Hate the fucking manager all you want but make some sense by stating that fact from the off. You would have more credibility for your posts.

The Ade i am referring to was the one (not unlike Kane) that has been selected to play for the starting eleven based solely on their effort and performances, and not based on some karate kicking YouTube video.

But today's game was a great example why Sandro should have been on the bench.

At 3-1 we should have hooked a striker (strangely enough Ade) and bought on a defensive midfielder just to close the game out.
Sherwood's substitutions were truly baffling in terms of getting/keeping a result and I worry that he is simply cutting off his nose to spite his face.
I never thought I'd have a problem with being able to bring on Soldado, Dembele, and Townsend off the bench but they were not what was required at the time.
 

thinktank

Hmmm...
Sep 28, 2004
45,893
68,893
Look, this is you opinion based on what?

Were you at the training sessions this week?

Just because you have a Sandro poster on your bedroom wall doesn't mean that Sherwood should pick him. He has picked a winning team again, and had we lost or drawn you would have had a valid argument. Hate the fucking manager all you want but make some sense by stating that fact from the off. You would have more credibility for your posts.

The Ade i am referring to was the one (not unlike Kane) that has been selected to play for the starting eleven based solely on their effort and performances, and not based on some karate kicking YouTube video.

I don't have to be at a training session to know that starting chad and paulinho in the middle without a defensive MF option on the bench - when one is available - is just fucking stupid (I don't think that point would get much argument from spurs fans, generally). And whoever else can't see that also reserves a place in the 'clueless' camp as well.


If we had to be at a training session before we had an opinion on here, this forum would have tumble-weed blowing through it 24/7.

And stop with the other rubbish Gaz ffs, you sound like a muddled plum. Get tim's cockney cock out of your gob; giving head is messing with your head.
 
Last edited:

WiganSpur

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
16,025
32,757
Look, this is you opinion based on what?

Were you at the training sessions this week?

Just because you have a Sandro poster on your bedroom wall doesn't mean that Sherwood should pick him. He has picked a winning team again, and had we lost or drawn you would have had a valid argument. Hate the fucking manager all you want but make some sense by stating that fact from the off. You would have more credibility for your posts.
Yes he won the game but Lloris was almost MoM against a team fighting to stay up at home. If they'd have had half decent strikers then we'd have been put to the sword just like Chelsea, Liverpool and Man City did to us. It really isn't hard to see how many chances we're gifting to the opposition. Palace was another example, it should have been over at half time. Lloris, Eriksen & occasionally Adebayor are papering over the cracks with individual brilliance.

You cannot simply be consistent enough over a league campaign and compete with teams around our level with a shambolic defence.
 

Gaz_Gammon

Well-Known Member
Apr 16, 2005
16,047
18,013
I don't have to be at a training session to know that starting chad and paulinho in the middle without a defensive MF option on the bench - when one is available - is just fucking stupid (I don't think that point would get much argument from spurs fans, generally). And whoever else can't see that also reserves a place in the 'clueless' camp as well.


If we had to be at a training session before we had an opinion on here, this forum would have tumble-weed blowing through it 24/7.

And stop with the other rubbish Gaz ffs, you sound like a muddled plum. Get tim's cockney cock out of your gob; giving head is messing with your head.


So, just plain assumption by you in your original post and nothing else. Fine by me.
 

Gaz_Gammon

Well-Known Member
Apr 16, 2005
16,047
18,013
Yes he won the game but Lloris was almost MoM against a team fighting to stay up at home. If they'd have had half decent strikers then we'd have been put to the sword just like Chelsea, Liverpool and Man City did to us. It really isn't hard to see how many chances we're gifting to the opposition. Palace was another example, it should have been over at half time. Lloris, Eriksen & occasionally Adebayor are papering over the cracks with individual brilliance.

You cannot simply be consistent enough over a league campaign and compete with teams around our level with a shambolic defence.


If, if, if, maybe, maybe, could have, might have, should'a could'a

Yup hindsight is a great thing. If only Fulham has Suarez..........................but they don't.
 
Top