- Dec 4, 2006
- 573
- 612
Got to say we look a better team without him despite his talent
When he plays it all revolves around him but without him the whole team looks fluid and in balance
:rofl:...too many beers me thinks :wink:
Got to say we look a better team without him despite his talent
When he plays it all revolves around him but without him the whole team looks fluid and in balance
He does change our formation to 4-5-1
It's true that our strikers have been poor but can the formation change account for the lack of goals scored at WHL?
He's an amazing player but are we a better team at home yet with him in it?
Mod's, ban and lock thread. :duh:
Erm. Ban for what? Having an opinion? It's a forum!
So far we have played better as a team without him in the front 2.
I'm not saying he's not a great player. Or that we can't find a system for him that suits the whole team.
Mod's, ban and lock thread. :duh:
:shake:
I said this back in October and it's still true
VDV plays far too deep at home. We'd do better with two out and out strikers like last season.
For VDV to drop that deep we'd need a Drogba/Rooney/Torres to hold the ball up.
I said this back in October and it's still true
VDV plays far too deep at home. We'd do better with two out and out strikers like last season.
For VDV to drop that deep we'd need a Drogba/Rooney/Torres to hold the ball up.
Problem today a lot of the time is he drops so deep to pick up the ball, crouch becomes very isolated. VDV basically wants to do everything and is a bit like a school kid in that he constantly runs to where the ball is (and is petulant and gets booked for it). Definitely an off day for him I thought but it's not like he's droppable, he's the only one who looks like scoring
The writings on the wall. Great player but he doesn't really fit in anywhere.
:roll: