Given the current predicament, sacking a manager that had long term plans and the players on his side without a replacement, it does definitely lend itself to saying we should have stuck with AVB though. Though many may not have liked the rudder we had with AVB, at least it was one, now w'ere rudderless.
We were losing with our "rudder" in place and so far we still are without it, not sure what the difference is to be honest.
The bit in bold I find a little baffling. So what if he had long term plans, not much good to anyone if they were a bit shit or more importantly if his short term plans were a bit shit. It's all part of this surreal, "he needed more time" stuff, as if he was showing in any way that he was going to get better, as if anything since the day he left Porto showed he was going to get better. Please don't trot out the old "record points total" bollocks. We finished 5th and that's the only thing that mattered.