What's new

Stoke City Vs Tottenham: Match Thread

Gaz_Gammon

Well-Known Member
Apr 16, 2005
16,047
18,013
Matzdorf, your analysis is based in half a season's data and you are comparing a guy who was there for a season and a half. There are also confounding factors to take into account, plus biases that include having been hounded from day one by the likes of that fat turd, Martin Samuel, and his glove puppet, Neil Ashton.

Dave was asked to provide these stats by another poster. The jury is still out as to if AVB was here for a season and a half.....
 

chrissivad

Staff
May 20, 2005
51,646
58,072
Ade, Chadli and Kaboul heading home

10253866_701616406563406_2832608079984937742_n.jpg
 

davidmatzdorf

Front Page Gadfly
Jun 7, 2004
18,106
45,030
Shame the cup exit stats don't hold up very good.

1/10

Sherwood's cup results have been disappointing and we won a succession of 10 cup matches under AVB. However, this has to be tempered by the circumstances: early in the season, under AVB, we were playing a very low standard of cup opposition; Sherwood's accession coincided precisely with our move to playing more serious cup opposition.

I'm not convinced that we would have done any better against the teams that knocked us out of the various cups, with AVB still in place. We probably would have defended more tightly; but where were the goals going to come from?
 

greaves

Well-Known Member
Dec 6, 2006
6,215
9,158
This is a misleading and badly chosen piece of analysis.

When AVB left, 5 points off 4th represented 10.4% of the points available in the 16 league matches up to that point.

Now, after 36 matches, 7 points represents 6.5% of the points available in the 36 league matches up to this point.

It is in the nature of the table to open up, i.e., for points gaps to widen as the season goes on, because there are still 20 clubs, but there have been more points available for them to win and lose. My statistic is a meaningful one; yours is not.

What reinforces this is that we have obtained more points per match under Sherwood (1.95/match) than we did under Villas Boas (1.67/match). That has kept us relatively closer to the top 4.

Don't misunderstand my point: I think we should move on from Sherwood next season if there is a more experienced manager with a suitable track record and style of football available. But insisting that Sherwood has been unsuccessful in the league, compared to AVB, is factually incorrect, by a substantial margin.

Which demonstrates that Sherwood has, in some measure, been successful, especially given his 'under-schooled' background. And as you and others have said, we have to be less ponderous, less crablike in our play. Of course, this is not a problem that only afflicts Spurs. Man U seem to have been similarly affected. A lack of confidence, spark and rocket fuel. Sherwood has tried to provide this, however much it has not yet paid off. And the players need more time. But I would rather be in our shoes than Man Us, looking ahead. We are a season up on them. Their own rebuilding is about to begin.
 

davidmatzdorf

Front Page Gadfly
Jun 7, 2004
18,106
45,030
Matzdorf, your analysis is based in half a season's data and you are comparing a guy who was there for a season and a half.

I was asked a question and I answered it, from my spreadsheet. The results of the analysis are what they are and they are accurate. Last season we had a different squad.

Have a good read through the excellent long post by EJWTartanSpur for a good setting-out of my own views. Sherwood has done the one thing he could do, which was to bring three good players into the team who belonged there (Adebayor, Bentaleb and Kane). Then he has let all of them play, which has included permitting attackers to enter the penalty box, which was more than they were doing in the first 16 league games of this season.

What he hasn't done is to show any special abilities to take a top-6 squad and get it into the top 4. He hasn't the experience to work magic on players' psyches, in Redknapp's mode. He hasn't the experience to set out a team to get a result against squads with a superior or equal quality of players to our own. All he has accomplished, which is a not-at-all-bad 1.95 points per match, is down to letting a good squad play to the players' basic individual abilities, but for the team to lack coherence and shape. In this, he has also been undermined by numerous key injuries.

The result is that we have reliably beaten inferior teams and reliably been beaten by superior teams. At least we have scored goals, which is more than we did earlier this season.
 

Gaz_Gammon

Well-Known Member
Apr 16, 2005
16,047
18,013
The search party is still looking for your wit...

And after your brilliant (but seriously flawed) cunning plan to keep Lloris at Spurs by loaning him out, Levy will be looking for a keeper. Well up until Lloris loses in next seasons CL at some other club......
 

Gaz_Gammon

Well-Known Member
Apr 16, 2005
16,047
18,013
Sherwood's cup results have been disappointing and we won a succession of 10 cup matches under AVB. However, this has to be tempered by the circumstances: early in the season, under AVB, we were playing a very low standard of cup opposition; Sherwood's accession coincided precisely with our move to playing more serious cup opposition.

I'm not convinced that we would have done any better against the teams that knocked us out of the various cups, with AVB still in place. We probably would have defended more tightly; but where were the goals going to come from?

Didn't we lose at Arsenal? Like we always win there don't we.

Thought the CC defeat was one of Tims first in charge?
 

diamondlight

Well-Known Member
Nov 16, 2006
1,263
1,326
I was asked a question and I answered it, from my spreadsheet. The results of the analysis are what they are and they are accurate. Last season we had a different squad.

Have a good read through the excellent long post by EJWTartanSpur for a good setting-out of my own views. Sherwood has done the one thing he could do, which was to bring three good players into the team who belonged there (Adebayor, Bentaleb and Kane). Then he has let all of them play, which has included permitting attackers to enter the penalty box, which was more than they were doing in the first 16 league games of this season.

What he hasn't done is to show any special abilities to take a top-6 squad and get it into the top 4. He hasn't the experience to work magic on players' psyches, in Redknapp's mode. He hasn't the experience to set out a team to get a result against squads with a superior or equal quality of players to our own. All he has accomplished, which is a not-at-all-bad 1.95 points per match, is down to letting a good squad play to the players' basic individual abilities, but for the team to lack coherence and shape. In this, he has also been undermined by numerous key injuries.

The result is that we have reliably beaten inferior teams and reliably been beaten by superior teams. At least we have scored goals, which is more than we did earlier this season.

Very enlightening points as ever, although with one exception in my opinion. I think Sherwood has worked a little bit of magic on Adebayor's psyche as well as just putting him in the team. If Sherwood stays maybe we'll see more magic worked on more players' psyches, as he grows into the job. But that's admittedly a fairly big 'maybe' and a very big 'if'.
 

Sweetsman

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2011
6,673
6,588
And after your brilliant (but seriously flawed) cunning plan to keep Lloris at Spurs by loaning him out, Levy will be looking for a keeper. Well up until Lloris loses in next seasons CL at some other club......
You see, the point that keeps failing to lodge in what passes for your brain is that I said we could consider it if he wanted to leave for CL football. He has after all hinted at this in a recent interview in a newspaper read by Johnny Foreigner. I would like to know what you would do if he does start making noises about leaving.
 

Sweetsman

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2011
6,673
6,588
I was asked a question and I answered it, from my spreadsheet. The results of the analysis are what they are and they are accurate. Last season we had a different squad.

Have a good read through the excellent long post by EJWTartanSpur for a good setting-out of my own views. Sherwood has done the one thing he could do, which was to bring three good players into the team who belonged there (Adebayor, Bentaleb and Kane). Then he has let all of them play, which has included permitting attackers to enter the penalty box, which was more than they were doing in the first 16 league games of this season.

What he hasn't done is to show any special abilities to take a top-6 squad and get it into the top 4. He hasn't the experience to work magic on players' psyches, in Redknapp's mode. He hasn't the experience to set out a team to get a result against squads with a superior or equal quality of players to our own. All he has accomplished, which is a not-at-all-bad 1.95 points per match, is down to letting a good squad play to the players' basic individual abilities, but for the team to lack coherence and shape. In this, he has also been undermined by numerous key injuries.

The result is that we have reliably beaten inferior teams and reliably been beaten by superior teams. At least we have scored goals, which is more than we did earlier this season.
Did I ask why you had done it? No.
 

TheGreenLily

"I am Shodan"
Aug 5, 2009
12,023
8,699
Yes, we have won a number of games solely because we have better players who can make things happen (as we did last season, when we also had Bale), but the analogous problem with AVB's approach was that it actually stifled those better players and their 'flashes of class'.

In most of our early-season games, we would watch this mind-numbing hesitancy for about 65 of the 90 minutes: we'd have the football, but all of our 'better players' were too inhibited by rigid tactical rules to express themselves and actually try to score a goal.

What on earth would make you think that the last part of this sentence follows sensibly from the first part? Carefully constructed and analysed statistics can illuminate things that may not otherwise be obvious to people who view football matches with preconceived ideas. Of course they 'don't tell the whole story', but that's a straw-man argument, because no one ever claims that they do. People here who see the value in stats sometimes appear to rely solely upon them, but that's just because they have to repeat themselves constantly, as a result of idiots people who make daft statements like 'you can shove [stats] where the sun don't shine'.
I just killed 172 cops in Payday 2...

I don't care, I feel good :D
 

Gaz_Gammon

Well-Known Member
Apr 16, 2005
16,047
18,013
You see, the point that keeps failing to lodge in what passes for your brain is that I said we could consider it if he wanted to leave for CL football. He has after all hinted at this in a recent interview in a newspaper read by Johnny Foreigner. I would like to know what you would do if he does start making noises about leaving.

Sell him.

We did with
Carrick
Berbatov
Keane
Modric
VDV
Bale

You"d just loan Lloris to Arse or Chel$ea or whoever. Guess you play a lot of PL Manager....because i can find no one as hard as i try who agrees with your illogical theory.

Is Mike Yarwood still around. Haven't asked him yet.
 
Top