What's new

Adam Lallana

Snarfalicious

Well-Known Member
Jul 15, 2012
15,747
72,246
You're probably gonna get slammed for this and I think you knew that, but I do agree with you. On an even level, sure I'd take Lallana. But considering the price disparity, Milner's ability to play a bit deeper in midfield, and the proven winner's mentality of Milner (therefore would bust his bollocks in the high press from midfield in every single game he plays), I'd certainly take Milner given our current circumstances and use that money elsewhere.

I'd sure as Hell take Milner over Lennon. I also love the idea of Milner being that impact sub late in just about any situation (press to win the ball back to spring a necessary attack or simply to give some extra grit to see out a lead). Having Lamela and Milner manning the right of our attack sounds pretty good to me.
 

DaSpurs

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2013
11,816
13,655
I'd sure as Hell take Milner over Lennon. I also love the idea of Milner being that impact sub late in just about any situation (press to win the ball back to spring a necessary attack or simply to give some extra grit to see out a lead). Having Lamela and Milner manning the right of our attack sounds pretty good to me.

Even beyond that, is Milner's ability to quite literally play across the midfield in attempt to spring that attack. I think he'd be excellent in Poch's system, but unfortunately I think he'd come with a demand to start in the league and I for one wouldn't want Poch to afford him that given the need for our young talents to build with Poch's project. But nonetheless, I would genuinely love to have such a hard worker with a winner's mentality within our young squad.
 

Spurrific

Well-Known Member
Jun 2, 2011
13,501
57,356
Lallana different class to both. I just don't get this claim we don't need Lallana. Eriksen did ok but generally we were chronically bad in the areas just outside the box.

Wow. Sometimes posts make me want the sweet release of death. Adam Fucking Lallana different class to Eriksen and Lamela.
 

kitchen

Well-Known Member
Nov 24, 2006
2,326
3,695
Lallana different class to both. I just don't get this claim we don't need Lallana. Eriksen did ok but generally we were chronically bad in the areas just outside the box.

Woah! Steady on. Now I rate Lallana a lot but to say he's 'different class' to Eriksen is quite ridiculous.

Eriksen is real quality and will only get better as he gets more used to the English game. Lallana is already used to the English game and his technique is short of Eriksens IMO.
 

Lufti

Well-Known Member
Jan 3, 2013
7,994
16,635
Lallana different class to both. I just don't get this claim we don't need Lallana. Eriksen did ok but generally we were chronically bad in the areas just outside the box.

Eriksen managed almost the same goals and assists in total in his first year in the prem in much less games and he's much younger
 
Last edited:

greaves

Well-Known Member
Dec 6, 2006
6,214
9,156
Woah! Steady on. Now I rate Lallana a lot but to say he's 'different class' to Eriksen is quite ridiculous.

Eriksen is real quality and will only get better as he gets more used to the English game. Lallana is already used to the English game and his technique is short of Eriksens IMO.
Lallana may be lower middle. Not sure of the other two.
 

Danny1

Well-Known Member
Dec 6, 2006
5,698
17,612
Ha oh dear, Lallana in a different class to Eriksen & Lamela....! Cannot believe some of the tripe that gets written on here, Adam Lallana who has had one good season in a top league in his entire career and is 26 is apparently in a different league to a player who has 44 caps for his country, just turned 22 and has had a very good debut season in a new league and also to a player who has just turned 22, scored 15 goals as a 20 year old in Serie A and has struggled through injury in his first season but has been touted as one of the best youngsters in the world.

I really dont get some peoples thoughts, but hey I guess thats why the game is so good!
 

Drexl

Well-Known Member
Jan 31, 2013
4,202
6,547
You're probably gonna get slammed for this and I think you knew that, but I do agree with you. On an even level, sure I'd take Lallana. But considering the price disparity, Milner's ability to play a bit deeper in midfield, and the proven winner's mentality of Milner (therefore would bust his bollocks in the high press from midfield in every single game he plays), I'd certainly take Milner given our current circumstances and use that money elsewhere.

Ha very possibly but i would rather say what i think is right than say what others want to hear, i have 5 times as many positives as neutrals and negatives combined ;)

I love Milner, one of the most underated players of the modern era, Would love Milner at Spurs, always gives 110% and is a versatile and very handy player indeed

One swallow don't make a summer and that applies to Lallana

He could keep up the form of last season but is too much of a risk whereas Milner is proven year after year and less than half the price
 

yankspurs

Enic Out
Aug 22, 2013
42,002
71,475
One good season on the top level at 26 and people thinks he's some kind of great player? No. Just no. He's an okay player who will be lucky to do as good as he did this past season. Not close to being worth 15m let alone 25m, IMO. On a club like us or Liverpool, he'd be second choice and nothing more. The suggestion that he is as good or better than Shaqiri, Eriksen or Lamela is just plain laughable.

I'd take him but at 8-10m and no more. Let Liverpool blow 25m on him. At Soton's asking price, I am not touching him with a 10 foot pole.
 

dirtyh

One Skin, two skin.....
Jun 24, 2011
8,740
25,409
If Lallana is worth 25 mill then eriksen must be worth 40 at least. Eriksen has been one of europe's top talents for the last 3 years. Before this season I doubt if anyone knew anything about Lallana. Don't get me wrong he's decent but not fit to lace eriksen's boots. Don't get me started on lamela, he's got the potential to be one of the top 3 players in the world, still can't believe we got either of them.
If we're spending big money it has to go on one of lb, cb, rw.
 

Snarfalicious

Well-Known Member
Jul 15, 2012
15,747
72,246
Eriksen absolutely demolishes Lallana in my opinion. 4 years younger, just as dual-footed/versatile, played for a better side and put together 7 goals and 9 assists in his first season in just 25 BPL appearances. Lallana managed 9 goals in 8 assists in 38 BPL appearances. You'd think Lallana has double those tallies judging by the asking price and how highly regarded he is (primarily because, y'know, English).
 

Matrix

Well-Known Member
Aug 9, 2008
2,924
5,680
Lallana is good. Very good but to say he's in a different class to Eriksen and Lamela is utter tripe. Wow. I will say Lallana would improve the squad. 10 x the player Siggy is.
I for one would prefer Barkley for the money being touted for Lallana, but wouldn't be against the idea of going for him.
 

Mr Pink

SC Supporter
Aug 25, 2010
55,411
100,976
Lallana is in the same sort of class to Eriksen and Lamela IMO. In and around that bracket anyway.

The three of them playing behind a forward could be devastating.
 

Mr Pink

SC Supporter
Aug 25, 2010
55,411
100,976
One good season on the top level at 26 and people thinks he's some kind of great player? No. Just no. He's an okay player who will be lucky to do as good as he did this past season. Not close to being worth 15m let alone 25m, IMO. On a club like us or Liverpool, he'd be second choice and nothing more. The suggestion that he is as good or better than Shaqiri, Eriksen or Lamela is just plain laughable.

I'd take him but at 8-10m and no more. Let Liverpool blow 25m on him. At Soton's asking price, I am not touching him with a 10 foot pole.

The mind boggles.
 
Top