I agree with PPG. Does anyone have some decent suggestions for some exact measurements, and I can edit the original post. Does anyone know what Ramos/Harry/AVB recorded - usually pretty good measures.
How about we judge it on quality of football. Quality meaning pleasing on the eye and also actually effective.
And maybe actually achieving something. Which we would have to agree, with a champions league campaign is Harry.
Just for once could we not be less than the sum of our parts.
I'm not advocating having a strategy with emphasis on draws, obviously. I'm simply saying that win % doesn't enclose the full story.WIth three points for a win and one for a draw, win percentage tells you more than loss percentage. PPG though is the real measure.
What is "quality of football" though? I'm a simple mind, when Spurs wins, I'm entertained. Simple as that.How about we judge it on quality of football. Quality meaning pleasing on the eye and also actually effective.
And maybe actually achieving something. Which we would have to agree, with a champions league campaign is Harry.
Just for once could we not be less than the sum of our parts.
What is "quality of football" though? I'm a simple mind, when Spurs wins, I'm entertained. Simple as that.
Well, I wasn't speaking on everybody else's behalf. Merely pointing out that quality can be difficult to assess or agree upon.Hmmm. I don't think its that simple. If a team is playing with a poor style it puts a lot more pressure on the manager. Sure, it's fine when they get the results, but as soon as they don't, the knives come out much quicker (look at AVB). Style of football is important for the fans at Spurs.
What is "quality of football" though? I'm a simple mind, when Spurs wins, I'm entertained. Simple as that.
I agree with PPG. Does anyone have some decent suggestions for some exact measurements, and I can edit the original post. Does anyone know what Ramos/Harry/AVB recorded - usually pretty good measures.
Using only one parameter isn't sufficient. Just as win % alone doesn't describe the full picture, PPG can be misleading. For instance, the season before the last, the number of draws throughout the league decreased heavily, meaning that the total amount of points distributed went up. Has the manager with x PPG while total points increased done as good of a job as the manager with x PPG when there were generally fewer points distributed?I agree with PPG. Does anyone have some decent suggestions for some exact measurements, and I can edit the original post. Does anyone know what Ramos/Harry/AVB recorded - usually pretty good measures.