What's new

Morgan Schneiderlin Signs For United

Snarfalicious

Well-Known Member
Jul 15, 2012
15,751
72,347
Do some of you people on here realize it's not as simple as saying "pay 25m and agree the fee"?He wants champions league and no doubt higher wages than what we can offer if available. We are no United financially. If they want him (which it seems like they do now) they will get him. Maybe we have a slim chance but no divine right to be able to sign him

YOU PEOPLE?!
 

spurs9

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
11,916
34,532
I know what you're saying and to an extent you're right of course

But that Bill Nic quote gets reeled out to justify every and everything connected to Spurs

Is it better to fail aiming high on all occasions? Especially when dealing with transfer windows

Failed aiming high for Schinderland and ended up with Stambouli, failed with Musacchio ended up with Fazio

Read Aguero, Rossi, Moutinho.....all players we supposedly failed while aiming high for and unless you consider the likes of Stambouli and Fazio to have in them the echo of glory I think this illustrates the problem

I agree we should be aiming for the right player/s, I agree as a result there will be competition for that player but what we need to avoid, what I hope we will correct now we have a new group of people involved in scouting and signing players is getting in to the types of situations that comprise our whole transfer window

We aimed high by splashing big money on the likes of Soldado, Lamela and Paulinho when we sold Bale - I''m yet to see the echo's of glory from that - we must stop spending silly money on the wrong type of player just like we must stop chasing players who ultimately don't sign to the extent where there is no suitable replacement signed once they do not sign

I'm all for us chasing the target we want and the guy we have identified as our number 1 - I agree with you that we should be after the right player not just the easy player to get. What however we cannot continue to do is chase these players unsuccessfully and miss out on suitable alternatives as a result (and end up panic buying someone who is not fit for purpose and either doesn't play or isn't very good when he does)

So I hope with the new guys in and around the transfer dealings that now when we aim high for transfers we will also have a number of equally suitable alternatives we can sign if and when the top targets don't come off.
I think you have misinterpreted what @TrickyVilla is saying (or I have). I think he is saying if we fail to get get the Schneiderlin or Musacchio, we try and get the equvilant that we have spent a lot of time evaluating (e.g. Kramer) but if we can't bring them in, we bring no-one in, avoiding more Stambouli and Fazio signings.

It seems we have a team in place now that has researched each player we are looking at to ensure they fit the system/league/style of play to minimise the risk of the signing being a failure (there will never be a 100% guarantee of success). If we can't bring in one of those thoroughly researched players in, we stick with what we have. I don't see what more we can do as a club given out lack of CL and income.
 

felmani26

SC Supporter
Jan 1, 2008
24,732
44,024
I think you have misinterpreted what @TrickyVilla is saying (or I have). I think he is saying if we fail to get get the Schneiderlin or Musacchio, we try and get the equvilant that we have spent a lot of time evaluating (e.g. Kramer) but if we can't bring them in, we bring no-one in, avoiding more Stambouli and Fazio signings.

It seems we have a team in place now that has researched each player we are looking at to ensure they fit the system/league/style of play to minimise the risk of the signing being a failure (there will never be a 100% guarantee of success). If we can't bring in one of those thoroughly researched players in, we stick with what we have. I don't see what more we can do as a club given out lack of CL and income.
Has to be the best approach here - absolutely no point in offloading high earning/low contributing squad players and replacing them with identikit players which only serve to waste resources and provide more hurdles for our promising youth.
 

spurs9

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
11,916
34,532
I think Liverpool are going to implode this coming season, I don't think Rodgers is a very good manager and I have a feeling Pool fans are going to turn on him and its going to get ugly real fast.
Completely agree. I don't think they learnt from the transfers last season at all. Milner is the only signing they have made, that when I look at their existing squad, makes sense. Why bring in Ings if Sturridge is injury prone and they already have Lambert, Balotelli & Origi, why not bring in a 1st choice starter and have Strurridge compete with him when fit. If they are bringing in a 1st choice striker, why bring in Ings as well? Why sign Firminho, when they have Coutinho, Lallana & Markovic?

They need a CB, have they even been linked to one?
 

spurs9

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
11,916
34,532
Has to be the best approach here - absolutely no point in offloading high earning/low contributing squad players and replacing them with identikit players which only serve to waste resources and provide more hurdles for our promising youth.
Especially in CM where we have a lot of youth prospects.
 

LexingtonSpurs

Well-Known Member
Aug 27, 2013
13,456
39,042
I think you have misinterpreted what @TrickyVilla is saying (or I have). I think he is saying if we fail to get get the Schneiderlin or Musacchio, we try and get the equvilant that we have spent a lot of time evaluating (e.g. Kramer) but if we can't bring them in, we bring no-one in, avoiding more Stambouli and Fazio signings.

It seems we have a team in place now that has researched each player we are looking at to ensure they fit the system/league/style of play to minimise the risk of the signing being a failure (there will never be a 100% guarantee of success). If we can't bring in one of those thoroughly researched players in, we stick with what we have. I don't see what more we can do as a club given out lack of CL and income.
One of the things about the mystical "black box" was that it was used to evaluate existing team players in addition to outsiders.

I imagine that all players on the first team, and academy (and loans) have been evaluated and players we look to bring in are better than internal candidates for those same positions.

We did not have that evaluation in place last summer.
 

paulcumpstone

Well-Known Member
Jul 17, 2008
8,781
10,892
One of the things about the mystical "black box" was that it was used to evaluate existing team players in addition to outsiders.

I imagine that all players on the first team, and academy (and loans) have been evaluated and players we look to bring in are better than internal candidates for those same positions.

We did not have that evaluation in place last summer.

haha can imagine how that went, every one being evaluated within the club then more and more of them being told they were no longer in the circle of trust
 

npearl4spurs

Believing Member
Sep 9, 2014
4,274
11,187
I think we'll sign him.

United will turn their noses up and think they can get someone better with better star appeal.

He agrees by early next week.
 

danielneeds

Kick-Ass
May 5, 2004
24,183
48,814
Shrewd signing by United if it comes to pass. Obviously Schweinsteiger was getting too expensive or turned them down. Schneiderlin exactly the player they need. Let's hope out other irons in the fire turn out to be something decent.
 

Bus-Conductor

SC Supporter
Oct 19, 2004
39,837
50,713
I think you have misinterpreted what @TrickyVilla is saying (or I have). I think he is saying if we fail to get get the Schneiderlin or Musacchio, we try and get the equvilant that we have spent a lot of time evaluating (e.g. Kramer) but if we can't bring them in, we bring no-one in, avoiding more Stambouli and Fazio signings.

It seems we have a team in place now that has researched each player we are looking at to ensure they fit the system/league/style of play to minimise the risk of the signing being a failure (there will never be a 100% guarantee of success). If we can't bring in one of those thoroughly researched players in, we stick with what we have. I don't see what more we can do as a club given out lack of CL and income.


I hope that is true (@TrickyVilla ?).
 

TEESSIDE1

Married, new job and Spurs on the up!
Jul 3, 2006
15,344
19,207
Completely agree. I don't think they learnt from the transfers last season at all. Milner is the only signing they have made, that when I look at their existing squad, makes sense. Why bring in Ings if Sturridge is injury prone and they already have Lambert, Balotelli & Origi, why not bring in a 1st choice starter and have Strurridge compete with him when fit. If they are bringing in a 1st choice striker, why bring in Ings as well? Why sign Firminho, when they have Coutinho, Lallana & Markovic?

They need a CB, have they even been linked to one?

Yes, bought the highly rated youngster Gomez from Charlton for £3.5m.

Regardless of whether the Liverpool squad gels, the worrying thing is they've multiple options all over the place whereas we don't. Lose Kane to injury and we're screwed.
 

spurs9

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
11,916
34,532
Yes, bought the highly rated youngster Gomez from Charlton for £3.5m.

Regardless of whether the Liverpool squad gels, the worrying thing is they've multiple options all over the place whereas we don't. Lose Kane to injury and we're screwed.
We do have multiple options but most don't give us balance and don't fit us or the league and Liverpool could have the same problem.

Gomez will turn out to be a good defender IMO but he is a few years away from making a difference in the first team and we have 2 CB's (1 a year younger and 1 a year older) who are better and have more potential IMO.
 

Joshua

Well-Known Member
Jan 31, 2015
2,226
13,018
Alex Goring Crook who I think is reliable with Southampton (not 100%?) seems pretty sure Schneiderlin is off too United :/
 
Top